1. Curriculum Compacting
By Sally M. Reis &
Joseph S. Renzulli

2. Is a differentiation strategy…
Of content
Of process
Of products
Of classroom management
Of teacher commitment

3. Of content…
Streamlines grade-level content for high potential students
Allows them more time for challenging work
Teacher documents which students have mastered goals
Provides instructional options & reduces redundancy

4. Of Process….. Allows replacement learning opportunities
Individual or small group learning
Interest or learning centers
Seminars
Self-directed activities

5. Of Products….. Not just tests and scores
Presentations of varied outcomes by students
Not all students have same product

6. Of Classroom Management….
Requires flexibility
Not all students required to attend direct instruction
Various student contracts for self-directed learning

7. Of Teacher Commitment….
Creative and supportive school environment
Can be extended to non-gifted students
Teacher also is a learner
Learning extended outside of classroom
Mentors and telementors…not just “The Teacher”

8. In Conclusion
“This approach can benefit teachers of all grades in most content areas and it addresses the demand for more challenging learning experiences designed to help all students achieve at high levels and realize their potential.”
Curriculum Compacting, Sally M. Reis &
Joseph S. Renzulli, 2005, Karnes and Kozak