Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byAleesha Lewis Modified over 6 years ago
1
presented by: Belinda, Deborah, Pamela, & Stephanie
Challenging “Resistance to Change” The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science Eric B. Dent Susan Galloway Goldberg presented by: Belinda, Deborah, Pamela, & Stephanie
2
Perspective Shift People do NOT resist change WHAT?
Most change initiatives fail because of the assumption that people resist change
3
What are people resisting?
Loss of Status Loss of pay Loss of comfort The unknown Management ideas that are not feasible Being dictated to That is not the same as resisting change According to Kotter (1995) People understand the new vision and want to make it happen However there are obstacles to making it happen. that usually makes the employee choose between the new vision and their own self-interest.
4
How Resistance to Change Theory began
Began with Kurt Lewin perspectives handed down in two ways; shared commitment to beliefs exemplars (basic material all students are taught about a subject) This explanation is offered by Kuhn (1970)
5
What do the Textbooks Say?
Kreitner management must foresee & neutralize resistance Griffin; Aldag & Stearns; Schermerhorn Causes of resistance, Strategies to overcome resistance Employees can be manipulated by withholding information Dubrin & Ireland Change is due to; fear of poor outcomes personally inconvenienced fear of the unknown These are the exemplars that perpetuate the theory. They do not even define resistance to change, they just assume that it exists and that it is the responsibility of management/administration to overcome it. Also assumed is that it has a negative impact on change, and that it prohibits progress. Noteworthy is the context of the birth and fruition of these ideas that have not significantly been challenged. It was during the 1950’s when it was common for managers to think dichotomously of labor vrs. management and when labor union membership was at its peak.
6
Getting back to Lewin…. Lewin’s concept is different from today’s model resistance to change could come from anywhere within the system, less likely from employees Kotter also concluded the same Group dynamics is an important force and resistance to change is more of a systems phenomenon, not a mental one
7
Reframing our Approach or Asking More Beautiful Questions
Am I soliciting participation from all stakeholders? Do I understand group dynamics and their impact on the change system? Have I removed known obstacles? Have I considered the effect of change on social aspects of employees? Is this really resistance to change or just resistance to bad management decisions? Are there ways to channel resistance constructively It is important that all people participate in the change process Social aspects of change need to be addressed Total blame for resistance is on the employees????? Assumption is that resistance to change is ALWAYS inappropriate. Management always implements change Resistance to change is to be expected Textbook strategies for overcoming resistance to change are ineffective
8
Connection to Leadership
Because management deals mostly with the status quo and leadership deals mostly with change, in the next century we are going to have to try to become much more skilled at creating leaders. John P. Kotter
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.