Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
Dynamics of the family of complex maps with: Paul Blanchard Toni Garijo Matt Holzer Dan Look Sebastian Marotta Mark Morabito Monica Moreno Rocha Kevin Pilgrim Elizabeth Russell Yakov Shapiro David Uminsky Sum Wun Ellce
2
Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
1. The Escape Trichotomy Cantor set Sierpinski curve Cantor set of circles
3
Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
2. Structures in the dynamical plane All are Sierpinski curve Julia sets
4
Singular Perturbations of Complex Polynomials
3. Structures in the parameter planes
5
These lectures will deal with the dynamics
of the family of complex maps where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Multibrot set
6
These lectures will deal with the dynamics
of the family of complex maps where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Multibrot set But for simplicity, we’ll concentrate for the most part on the easier family
7
Why the interest in these maps?
8
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of
9
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of When but when , the dynamical behavior “explodes.” we completely understand the dynamics of
10
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ?
11
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!):
12
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!): Iterate:
13
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!): Iterate: a singular perturbation of z/2
14
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? You use Newton’s method (of course!): Whenever the equation has a multiple root, the corresponding Newton’s method involves a singular perturbation.
15
Why the interest in these maps?
First, these are singular perturbations of Second, how do you solve the equation ? Third, we are looking at maps on the boundary of the set of rational maps of degree 2n a very interesting topic of contemporary research.
16
Dynamics of the family of complex maps
The Escape Trichotomy Dynamics of the family of complex maps with: Paul Blanchard Matt Holzer U. Hoomiforgot Dan Look Sebastian Marotta Monica Moreno Rocha Yakov Shapiro David Uminsky
17
A rational map of degree 2n.
Dynamics of complex and A rational map of degree 2n.
18
Dynamics of complex and A rational map of degree 2n. The Julia set is:
The closure of the set of repelling periodic points; The boundary of the escaping orbits; The chaotic set. The Fatou set is the complement of
19
When , the Julia set is the unit circle
20
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
21
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
22
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
23
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
24
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
25
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
26
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
27
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Colored points have orbits that escape to infinity: Escape time: red (fastest) orange yellow green blue violet (slowest)
28
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
29
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
30
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
31
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
32
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
33
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
34
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
35
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
36
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
37
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
38
When , the Julia set is the unit circle Black points have orbits that do not escape to infinity:
39
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
40
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
41
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
42
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
43
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
44
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
45
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
46
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
47
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
48
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
49
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
50
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
51
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
52
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
53
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
54
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
55
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
56
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
57
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
58
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
59
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
60
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
61
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
62
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
63
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
64
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
65
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
66
When , the Julia set is the unit circle The Julia set is the boundary of the black & colored regions.
67
When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes
68
When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes A Sierpinski curve
69
When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes Another Sierpinski curve
70
When , the Julia set is the unit circle But when , the Julia set explodes Also a Sierpinski curve
71
The Julia set has 2n-fold symmetry since
Easy computations: The Julia set has 2n-fold symmetry since where is a 2nth root of unity
72
Easy computations: 2n free critical points
73
Easy computations: 2n free critical points
74
Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values
75
Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values
76
Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values
77
Easy computations: 2n free critical points Only 2 critical values But really only 1 free critical orbit since the map has 2n-fold symmetry
78
Easy computations: B is superattracting, so have immediate basin B mapped n-to-1 to itself.
79
Easy computations: B is superattracting, so have immediate basin B mapped n-to-1 to itself. T 0 is a pole, so have trap door T mapped n-to-1 to B.
80
So any orbit that eventually
Easy computations: B is superattracting, so have immediate basin B mapped n-to-1 to itself. T 0 is a pole, so have trap door T mapped n-to-1 to B. So any orbit that eventually enters B must do so by passing through T.
81
There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B:
The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B:
82
There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B:
The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B: B is a Cantor set
83
The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B: B is a Cantor set T is a Cantor set of simple closed curves (this case does not occur if n = 2)
84
The Escape Trichotomy There are three distinct ways the critical orbit can enter B: B is a Cantor set T is a Cantor set of simple closed curves (this case does not occur if n = 2) T is a Sierpinski curve
85
parameter plane when n = 3 Case 1: B is a Cantor set
86
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
87
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
88
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
89
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
90
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
91
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
92
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
93
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
94
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
95
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
96
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
97
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set B is a Cantor set
98
B is a Cantor set Draw curves connecting the
two critical values to in B
99
B is a Cantor set The preimages are curves
passing through the critical points and connecting c to
100
B is a Cantor set The preimages are curves
passing through the critical points and connecting c to and to 0
101
Choose a large circle in B
is a Cantor set Choose a large circle in B
102
and locate its two preimages
B is a Cantor set and locate its two preimages
103
Construct the regions I0, ... I2n-1
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Construct the regions I0, ... I2n-1
104
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij
105
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij
106
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij
107
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij
108
B is a Cantor set I1 I2 I0 I3 I5 I4 Each of the regions I0, ... I2n-1
is mapped 1-1 over the union of the Ij is a Cantor set
109
Case 2: the critical values lie in T, not B
parameter plane when n = 3
110
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 T lies in the McMullen domain
111
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain Remark: There is no McMullen domain in the case n = 2.
112
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain
113
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain
114
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain
115
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain
116
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain
117
lies in the McMullen domain
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Cantor set of simple closed curves T lies in the McMullen domain
118
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
v c Why is the preimage of T an annulus?
119
Could it be that each critical point lies in a disjoint preimage of T?
120
Could it be that each critical point lies in a disjoint preimage of T?
No. The map would then be 4n to 1 on the preimage of T.
121
By 2n-fold symmetry, there can then be only
Could it be that each critical point lies in a disjoint preimage of T? No. The map would then be 4n to 1 on the preimage of T. By 2n-fold symmetry, there can then be only one preimage of T
122
Riemann-Hurwitz formula:
F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R
123
Riemann-Hurwitz formula:
F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) *
124
In our case, R is the trap door and D is the
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * In our case, R is the trap door and D is the preimage of T
125
Riemann-Hurwitz formula:
F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * We have deg F = 2n on D, so n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) *
126
and R = T is a disk, so n(R) = 1
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * and R = T is a disk, so n(R) = 1 n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (1 - 2) + (# of critical points in D) *
127
and there are 2n critical points in D
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * and there are 2n critical points in D n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (1 - 2) ( 2n ) = 0 *
128
and there are 2n critical points in D
Riemann-Hurwitz formula: F: D R holomorphic branched covering n(D), n(R) = number of boundary components of D, R then: n(D) - 2 = (deg F) (n(R) - 2) + (# of critical points in D) * and there are 2n critical points in D n(D) - 2 = ( 2n ) (1 - 2) ( 2n ) = 0 * so n(D) = 2 and the preimage of T is an annulus.
129
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
v c So the preimage of T is an annulus.
130
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T B and T are mapped n-to-1 to B
131
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T The white annulus is mapped 2n-to-1 to T
132
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T So all that’s left are the blue annuli, and each are mapped n-to-1 to the union of the blue and white annuli.
133
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
B T So there are sub-annuli in the blue annuli that are mapped onto the white annulus.
134
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
135
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
136
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
then all other preimages of F-1(T) contain no critical points, and F is an n - to -1 covering on each, so the remaining preimages of T are all annuli.
137
J is a Cantor set of “circles”
These annuli fill out the Fatou set; removing all of them leaves us with a Cantor set of simple closed curves (McMullen)
138
Curiously, this cannot happen when n = 2.
139
Reason: Modulus of an annulus
1 r A Any annulus in the plane is conformally isomorphic to a unique round annulus of the form
140
Reason: Modulus of an annulus
1 r A Any annulus in the plane is conformally isomorphic to a unique round annulus of the form Then the modulus of A is
141
Reason: Modulus of an annulus
1 r A Any annulus in the plane is conformally isomorphic to a unique round annulus of the form Then the modulus of A is And if F : A A2 is an analytic n-to-1 covering map, then mod (A2) = n mod (A1)
142
This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain 2-to-1,
143
This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain 2-to-1, so the modulus of is 1/2 the modulus of
144
This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain 2-to-1, so the modulus of is 1/2 the modulus of , same with
145
This cannot happen when n = 2
Aout Amid Ain But then mod ( ) + mod ( ) = mod ( ) so there is no room for the middle annulus
146
Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are When n > 2 we have
147
Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are When n > 2 we have so the critical value lies in T when is small.
148
Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are But when n = 2 we have
149
Another reason this does not happen:
The critical values are But when n = 2 we have So, as , and 1/4 is nowhere near the basin of when is small
150
Parameter planes n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain
151
Parameter planes n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain
152
n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain
153
n = 2 n = 3 No McMullen domain McMullen domain
154
There is a lot of structure around the McMullen domain when n > 2
but a very different structure when n = 2.
155
Case 3: the critical orbit eventually lands in the trap door
is a “Sierpinski curve.”
156
Sierpinski Curve A Sierpinski curve is any planar
set that is homeomorphic to the Sierpinski carpet fractal. The Sierpinski Carpet
157
Topological Characterization
Any planar set that is: 1. compact 2. connected 3. locally connected 4. nowhere dense 5. any two complementary domains are bounded by simple closed curves that are pairwise disjoint is a Sierpinski curve. The Sierpinski Carpet
158
A Sierpinski curve is a universal plane continuum:
More importantly.... A Sierpinski curve is a universal plane continuum: Any planar, one-dimensional, compact, connected set can be homeomorphically embedded in a Sierpinski curve. For example....
159
The topologist’s sine curve
can be embedded inside
160
The topologist’s sine curve
can be embedded inside
161
The topologist’s sine curve
can be embedded inside skip Knaster
162
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
163
Start with the Cantor middle-thirds set
Knaster continuum A well known example of an indecomposable continuum Start with the Cantor middle-thirds set
164
Knaster continuum Connect symmetric points about 1/2 with semicircles
165
Knaster continuum Do the same below about 5/6
166
Knaster continuum And continue....
167
Knaster continuum
168
Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set.
169
Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set. It accumulates everywhere on itself and on K.
170
Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set. It accumulates everywhere on itself and on K. And is the only piece of K that is accessible from the outside.
171
Properties of K: There is one curve that passes through all the
endpoints of the Cantor set. It accumulates everywhere on itself and on K. And is the only piece of K that is accessible from the outside. But there are infinitely many other curves in K, each of which is dense in K.
172
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
173
Note the Cantor middle-thirds set along the middle horizontal line
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside Note the Cantor middle-thirds set along the middle horizontal line
174
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
175
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
176
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
177
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
178
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
179
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
180
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
181
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
182
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
183
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
184
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
185
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
186
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
187
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
188
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
189
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
190
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
191
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
192
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
193
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
194
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
195
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
196
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
197
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
198
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
199
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
200
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
201
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
202
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
203
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
204
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
205
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
206
The Knaster continuum can be embedded inside
207
Even this “curve” can be embedded inside
208
can be embedded inside Even this “curve” Moreover, Sierpinski curves
occur all the time as Julia sets.
209
lies in a Sierpinski hole
Case 3: the critical orbit eventually lands in the trap door. parameter plane when n = 3 T lies in a Sierpinski hole
210
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
211
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
212
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
213
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
214
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
215
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
216
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
217
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
218
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
219
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
220
lies in a Sierpinski hole
parameter plane when n = 3 J is a Sierpinski curve T lies in a Sierpinski hole
221
To show that is homeomorphic to
222
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s
223
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s Fatou set is the union of the preimages of B; all disjoint, open disks.
224
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s Fatou set is the union of the preimages of B; all disjoint, open disks.
225
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s If J contains an open set, then J = C.
226
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s If J contains an open set, then J = C.
227
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s No recurrent critical orbits, no parabolic points., and F is hyperbolic on J....
228
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s No recurrent critical orbits, no parabolic points., and F is hyperbolic on J....
229
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s J locally connected, so the boundaries are locally connected. Need to show they are s.c.c.’s. Can only meet at (preimages of) critical points, hence disjoint.
230
Need to show: compact connected nowhere dense locally connected bounded by disjoint s.c.c.’s So J is a Sierpinski curve.
231
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3)
232
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) Reason: The equation reduces to a polynomial of degree (n-1)(2n)(k-3) , and it can be shown that all the roots of this polynomial are distinct. (You can put a Böttcher coordinate on each Sierpinski hole).
233
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) Reason: The equation reduces to a polynomial of degree (n-1)(2n)(k-3) , and it can be shown that all the roots of this polynomial are distinct. (You can put a Böttcher coordinate on each Sierpinski hole). So we have exactly that many “centers” of Sierpinski holes, i.e., parameters for which the critical points all land on 0 and then
234
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 3 2 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3
235
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 3 2 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3
236
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 4 12 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3
237
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 3 escape time 4 12 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 3
238
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 4 escape time 3 3 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 4
239
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 4 escape time 4 24 Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 4
240
Have an exact count of the number of Sierpinski holes:
Theorem (Roesch): Given n, there are exactly (n-1)(2n) Sierpinski holes with escape time k. (k-3) n = 4 escape time 12 402,653,184 Sierpinski holes Sorry. I forgot to indicate their locations. parameter plane n = 4
241
Given two Sierpinski curve Julia
sets, when do we know that the dynamics on them are the same, i.e., the maps are conjugate on the Julia sets? Main Question: These sets are homeomorphic, but are the dynamics on them the same?
242
Given two Sierpinski curve Julia
sets, when do we know that the dynamics on them are the same, i.e., the maps are conjugate on the Julia sets? Main Question: We know when two maps with Sierpinski curve Julia sets are conjugate on their Julia sets (next lecture), but: Problem: What is the different dynamical behavior when two such maps are not conjugate on their Julia sets. Clearly a job for symbolic dynamics.....
243
Other ways that Sierpinski curve Julia sets arise:
Buried points in Cantor necklaces; 2. Main cardioids in buried Mandelbrot sets; Cantor sets of circles around the McMullen domain; 4. Other families of rational maps; 5. Sierpinski gaskets 6. Major applications
244
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The necklace is the Cantor middle thirds set with disks replacing removed intervals. parameter plane n = 4
245
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There is a Cantor necklace along the negative real axis parameter plane n = 4
246
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
5 5 4 3 4 The open disks are Sierpinski holes parameter plane n = 4
247
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
5 5 4 3 4 The open disks are Sierpinski holes; the buried points in the Cantor set also correspond to Sierpinski curves; parameter plane n = 4
248
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
5 5 4 3 4 The open disks are Sierpinski holes; the buried points in the Cantor set also correspond to Sierpinski curves; and all are dynamically different. parameter plane n = 4
249
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
A similar Cantor necklace when n = 2 The parameter plane when n = 2
250
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
A similar Cantor necklace when n = 2 The parameter plane when n = 2
251
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
6 6 5 4 5 A similar Cantor necklace when n = 2 The parameter plane when n = 2
252
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
253
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
254
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; they map to the imaginary axis; A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
255
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; they map to the imaginary axis; and then to the real axis, where the orbit then remains forever. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
256
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
When the parameter is negative, the critical points do not lie on the real axis; they map to the imaginary axis; and then to the real axis, where the orbit then remains forever. So the critical orbits are non-recurrrent J is locally connected. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
257
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The only Fatou components are B and its preimages since the critical orbits lie in a Cantor set which is not in the Fatou set J is compact and connected. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
258
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There is a Fatou component J is nowhere dense A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
259
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There is a Fatou component J is nowhere dense, and same arguments as before show that the boundary consists of disjoint simple closed curves J is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve from a buried point in the Cantor necklace when n=2
260
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The “endpoints” in the Cantor set (parameters on the boundaries of the Sierpinski holes) do not correspond to Sierpinski curves. A “hybrid” Sierpinski curve; some boundary curves meet.
261
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
The “endpoints” in the Cantor set (parameters on the boundaries of the Sierpinski holes) do not correspond to Sierpinski curves. Certain preimages of T touch each other at (pre)-critical points. A “hybrid” Sierpinski curve; some boundary curves meet.
262
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There are lots of other Cantor necklaces in the parameter planes. parameter plane n = 2
263
1. Cantor necklaces in the parameter plane
There are lots of other Cantor necklaces in the parameter planes. parameter plane n = 2
264
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. n = 4
265
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. n = 4
266
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. n = 4
267
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
268
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
269
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
270
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
271
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
272
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
273
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
274
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
275
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
276
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
277
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
278
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
279
If lies in the main cardioid of a buried Mandelbrot
set, then again the Julia set is a Sierpinski curve. A Sierpinski curve, but very different dynamically from the earlier ones. n = 4
280
If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. n = 3
281
If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. n = 3
282
If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. All parameters on these curves correspond to Sierpinski curves. n = 3
283
If n > 2, there are uncountably many simple
closed curves surrounding the McMullen domain; all these parameters are Sierpinski curves. And all non-symmetrically located parameters on these curves have very different dynamics on J. n = 3
284
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 2 centers n = 3
285
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 4 centers n = 3
286
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 10 centers n = 3
287
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 28 centers n = 3
288
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. 82 centers n = 3
289
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. passes through 1,594,324 centers. n = 3
290
If n > 2, there are also countably many different simple closed
curves accumulating on the McMullen domain. Each alternately passes through centers of Sierpinski holes and centers of baby Mandelbrot sets. As before, all non- symmetrically located centers have different dynamics. n = 3
291
Consider the family of maps
where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Mandelbrot set.
292
Consider the family of maps
where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Mandelbrot set.
293
Consider the family of maps
where c is the center of a hyperbolic component of the Mandelbrot set.
294
, the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.
295
, the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.
296
, the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.
297
, the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes.
298
, the Julia set again expodes.
When , the Julia set again expodes. A doubly-inverted Douady rabbit.
299
If you chop off the “ears” of each internal rabbit in each component
of the original Julia set, then what’s left is another Sierpinski curve (provided that both of the critical orbits eventually escape).
300
The (generalized) Sierpinski gasket also occurs
(although rarely) as a Julia set in these families
301
Choose at the tip of the parameter plane on the negative real axis
Parameter plane for n=2, d=1
302
This Julia set is homeomorphic to the gasket
303
If is a Misiurewicz parameter on the boundary of the
connectedness locus, then is a “generalized” gasket. Parameter plane for n=2, d=1
304
If is a Misiurewicz parameter on the boundary of the
connectedness locus, then is a “generalized” gasket. Parameter plane for n=2, d=1
305
If is a Misiurewicz parameter on the boundary of the
connectedness locus, then is a “generalized” gasket. Parameter plane for n=2, d=1
306
None of these other Julia sets are homeomorphic
to the Sierpinski gasket, however.
307
None of these other Julia sets are homeomorphic
to the Sierpinski gasket, however.
308
None of these other Julia sets are homeomorphic
to the Sierpinski gasket, however. T The “triangle” T touches the inner triangle twice, not once.
309
For other values of n and d, the generalized
Sierpinski gaskets are not triangular. T n = d = 2 A “square” gasket
310
For other values of n and d, the generalized
Sierpinski gaskets are not triangular. n = 3, d = 2 A “pentagonal” gasket
311
Here’s the parameter plane when n = 2:
312
and this object appears everywhere.....
Rotate it by 90 degrees: and this object appears everywhere.....
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.