Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Anomaly Realization in Condensed Matter
Eun-Gook Moon RIKEN. DEC. 6, 2016
2
Yesterday and today… We heard beautiful talks about anomalies in WSM / DSM. (CME, CVE, gravitational anomaly....) (almost all) WSM / DSM are made of s and p orbitals ~ weakly correlated systems ~ almost free theory is applicable (ARPES) In this talk, I focus on another realization of anomalies. What happens if strongly correlated systems have anomalies?
3
In condensed matter, more interests in anomalies!
At PRB In condensed matter, more interests in anomalies!
4
In condensed matter, more interests in anomalies!
At PRB In condensed matter, more interests in anomalies!
5
Outline Competing Orders Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson description
Exotic class of competing orders (beyond LGW) Anomalies’ lesson in competing orders Conclusion Let us review conventional LGW theory before
6
Concepts Anomaly Competing Orders Symmetry / Topology
Quantum Criticality Massless
7
Phase Diagrams in Strongly Correlated Systems
Nandi et.al., PRL 2010 L. Taillefer, 2010 Moll et.al., NC 2015 Kurosaki et.al., PRL 2005 Witczak-Krempa et.al., 2014 Muhlbauer et.al., Science 2009
8
Phase Diagrams in Strongly Correlated Systems
Nandi et.al., PRL 2010 L. Taillefer, 2010 Moll et.al., NC 2015 Kurosaki et.al., PRL 2005 Witczak-Krempa et.al., 2014 Muhlbauer et.al., Science 2009 Various Colors : Various Phases
9
Observations Various phases (Superconductors, Magnetism, Weyl semi-metals,…) Criteria of phases : Symmetry / Topology (ex : order parameters) SC : U(1) local symmetry + Higgs mechanism SDW : SU(2) spin rotation symmetry
10
Observations Various phases (Superconductors, Magnetism, Weyl semi-metals,…) Criteria of phases : Symmetry / Topology (ex : order parameters) SC : U(1) local symmetry + Higgs mechanism SDW : SU(2) spin rotation symmetry Overlapped colors / Non-monotonic phase boundaries Interplay between order parameters (Competition / Attraction) Competing orders
11
Competing orders + anomalies ???
Observations Various phases (Superconductors, Magnetism, Weyl semi-metals,…) Criteria of phases : Symmetry / Topology (ex : order parameters) SC : U(1) local symmetry + Higgs mechanism SDW : SU(2) spin rotation symmetry Overlapped colors / Non-monotonic phase boundaries Interplay between order parameters (Competition / Attraction) Competing orders + anomalies ???
12
Outline Competing Orders Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson description
Exotic class of competing orders (beyond LGW) Anomalies’ lesson in competing orders Conclusion Let us review conventional LGW theory before
13
Theories of competing orders
1. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson 2. Deconfined Quantum Criticality 3. Non-linear sigma model with Wess-Zumino-Witten term 4. Non-linear sigma model with theta term 5. …
14
Theories of competing orders
1. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson 2. Deconfined Quantum Criticality 3. Non-linear sigma model with Wess-Zumino-Witten term 4. Non-linear sigma model with theta term 5. … (ex : 1+1D spin chain)
15
Theories of competing orders
1. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson 2. Deconfined Quantum Criticality 3. Non-linear sigma model with Wess-Zumino-Witten term 4. Non-linear sigma model with theta term 5. … (spin liquid physics : spin fractionalization) (ex : 1+1D spin chain)
16
Theories of competing orders
1. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson 2. Deconfined Quantum Criticality 3. Non-linear sigma model with Wess-Zumino-Witten term 4. Non-linear sigma model with theta term 5. … (spin liquid physics : spin fractionalization) (ex : Witten, Non-abelian bosonization in D=2) (ex : 1+1D spin chain)
17
Theories of competing orders
1. Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson 2. Deconfined Quantum Criticality 3. Non-linear sigma model with Wess-Zumino-Witten term 4. Non-linear sigma model with theta term 5. … (spin liquid physics : spin fractionalization) (ex : 1+1D spin chain)
18
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Two order parameters Vector reps of
19
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Two order parameters Vector reps of O(3) ~ magnetism (Neel)
20
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Two order parameters Vector reps of
21
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Two order parameters Vector reps of Four phases (massive excitation) (Nambu-Goldstone) (Nambu-Goldstone) (Nambu-Goldstone)
22
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Two order parameters Vector reps of
23
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Near the multi-critical point,
24
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Near the multi-critical point, define super-spin
25
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Near the multi-critical point, define super-spin Enjoys O(N+M) symmetry Equivalent to O(N+M) NLSM
26
Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson
Near the multi-critical point, define super-spin + anisotropy terms Ex : S : all excitations are massive
27
Outline Competing Orders Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson description
Exotic class of competing orders (beyond LGW) Anomalies’ lesson in competing orders Conclusion Let us review conventional LGW theory before
28
Deconfined Quantum Criticality
Singh (2010) Direct Phase Transition without fine-tuning between magnetism (Neel) and charge density wave (VBS)
29
Deconfined Quantum Criticality
Singh (2010) Direct Phase Transition without fine-tuning between magnetism (Neel) and charge density wave (VBS) In LGW, this is impossible! → New competing order physics Spin liquid physics (fractionalization) : ex) electrical insulator but thermal metal Not spin excitation ( ) but spinon (z)!
30
Deconfined Quantum Criticality
Singh (2010) Direct Phase Transition without fine-tuning between magnetism (Neel) and charge density wave (VBS) In LGW, this is impossible! → New competing order physics Critical theory for competing orders CP(1) with non-compact U(1) gauge in (2+1)D
31
Deconfined Quantum Criticality
Another perspective : O(3) sym. broken O(2) sym. broken O(5) symmetric? O(3) ~ magnetism (Neel) O(2) ~ VBS NLSM ~ LGW. → “superspin” → O(5) NLSM ? NO!
32
Deconfined Quantum Criticality
Another perspective : O(3) sym. broken O(2) sym. broken O(5) symmetric? O(3) ~ magnetism (Neel) O(2) ~ VBS → “superspin” → O(5) NLSM –WZW?? O(5) NLSM-WZW ~ spin liquid physics in 3D Senthil and Fisher (2006)
33
Deconfined Quantum Criticality
In 2+1D, Senthil and Fisher : dQC ~ spin liquid physics ~ O(5) NLSM-WZW Many subsequent works! Grover and Senthil (2009), EGM (2012),….. In 3+1D, Hosur, Ryu, and Vishivanath studied O(6) NLSM–WZW. O(3) ~ magnetism (Neel) O(3) ~ VBS Hosur, Ryu, and Vishwanath (2010) But, no concrete results in O(N+M) NLSM-WZW in D>2.
34
Novel class of competing orders?
NLSM in D space-time dimensions ex : k : integer WZW on one higher dimensional manifold Imaginary WZW term (phase in path integral)
35
Novel class of competing orders?
NLSM in D space-time dimensions Same universality class as LGW’s? or different one? If different, how different?
36
Novel class of competing orders?
NLSM in D space-time dimensions D+1 derivatives two derivatives Same universality class as LGW’s? or different one? If different, how different? Two opposite arguments - Same! WZW terms has many derivatives in D>2. - Different! WZW term is topological.
37
Novel class of competing orders
In D=2, Witten showed NLSM-WZW is different from NLSM.
38
Novel class of competing orders
In D=2, Witten showed NLSM-WZW is different from NLSM. k=0 : NLSM, ground state : massive k=1,2,.. : NLSM-WZW ground state : massless (free fermion) Witten (1984) Non-abelian bosonization cf. no spontaneous symmetry breaking : Mermin-Wagner theoerem
39
Novel class of competing orders
two derivatives D+1 derivatives What about D>2? Very Difficult! Spontaneous symmetry breaking No 𝜺 / large N expansion due to WZW term No perturbative calculation Non-perturbative calculation is necessary
40
Outline Competing Orders Landau-Ginzburg-Wilson description
Exotic class of competing orders (beyond LGW) Anomalies’ lesson in competing orders Conclusion Let us review conventional LGW theory before
41
Anomaly Anomaly : quantum mechanical fluctuations violate a conservation “law”. Continuous Symmetry → Conservation law (Noether’s theorem) Anomaly → Conservation law is “spoiled” Pure quantum effects no classical analogue appears in path-integral (or loop calculation)
42
Anomaly Non-perturbative nature : tool for strong coupling physics.
43
Anomaly Non-perturbative nature : tool for strong coupling physics.
Example : U(1) Chiral anomaly Weyl semi-metal Classically, Quantum Mechanically,
44
Anomaly Example : Quantum Hall states Example : Topological Insulator
Son, Wiegmann, Fradkin, Ryu, Hughes,… Example : Topological Insulator Ryu et. al (2012) Anomalies in quantum phase transitions ?
45
Anomaly How to find anomaly?
Gauging symmetries and doing gauge-transformation Zero variation : no anomaly Non-zero variation : anomaly
46
Anomaly How to find anomaly?
Gauging symmetries and doing gauge-transformation Zero variation : no anomaly Non-zero variation : anomaly Ex ) chiral fermions with (classically) conserved currents
47
Anomaly How to find anomaly?
Gauging symmetries and doing gauge-transformation Zero variation : no anomaly Non-zero variation : anomaly
48
Anomaly How to find anomaly?
Gauging symmetries and doing gauge-transformation Zero variation : no anomaly Non-zero variation : anomaly
49
Gauging NLSM + WZW 1. Gauge SO(D+2) symmetry of NLSM +WZW in D=2, 4
Lie algebra of SO(D+2) Local transformation 2. Introduce gauge potential and covariant derivative 3. Gauge transform Hull and Spence (1991)
50
Gauging NLSM + WZW In D=2, WZW term in a differential form notation is
(variation is two dimensional) Introduce minimal coupling Its variation is not two dimensional (EOM is not two dimensional). Must be appended to make EOM two-dimensional
51
Gauging NLSM + WZW In D=2, we find the total action is
Anomaly is found by gauge transformation
52
Gauging NLSM + WZW In D=2, anomaly equation is
53
Gauging NLSM + WZW In D=2, anomaly equation is Gauge potential
Anomaly coefficient Gauge transformation
54
Gauging NLSM + WZW In D=2, anomaly equation is
Gauge potential Anomaly coefficient Gauge transformation In D=4, similar calculation gives
55
Anomaly of NLSM + WZW In 2D, 4D , anomaly coefficients are
Non-zero (anomalies) : k is non-zero, all directions in SO(D+2) group are used. Implication Anomaly is from WZW term. (interaction strength independent) Full symmetry cannot be gauged (anomaly). Subgroup can be gauged (SO(2) or SO(3)). 2D results are consistent with Witten’s results.
56
Anomaly matching ‘t Hooft anomaly matching
Anomaly at UV fixed point and IR fixed point should be matched. Local deformation of theories do not change anomaly. Roughly speaking, anomaly is conserved. Powerful tool to investigate low energy physics. Implication of anomaly Existence of the massless degrees of freedom (Singularity in correlation functions of currents, Coleman and Grossman 1982)
57
Anomaly of NLSM + WZW In 4D, without anomaly (NLSM, LGW)
NG modes critical modes massive In 4D, with anomaly (NLSM-WZW) NG modes critical modes massless (anomaly enforced)
58
Anomaly of NLSM + WZW In 4D, depending on microscopic details, RG flows are generic. We do not know how many first / second order phase transitions. NG modes ??? ?? If there is anomaly, then S should contain massless excitation!
59
Anomaly of NLSM + WZW In 4D, depending on microscopic details, RG flows are generic. We do not know how many first / second order phase transitions. NG modes ??? ?? If there is anomaly, then S should contain massless excitation! Do we have a concrete model for any RG flows?
60
Minimal model Integrating out fermions induces the WZW term.
Abanov and Wiegmann (2000) Symmetry group : Low energy degrees of freedom of the minimal model N+M : Goldstones QC : Goldstones + Fermions S : Fermions
61
Minimal model + Anisotropy
Anisotropy operators : N+M, N, M : Goldstones QC : Goldstones + Fermions S : Fermions S is stable! No deconfined QCP!
62
Non-Minimal models (a) Anisotropy is marginal
S is stable with one sign and unstable with an opposite sign. X : either a symmetry broken state or a CFT with the subgroup RG flow is similar to 2D results (dimerization). (b) Anisotropy is relevant Candidate for deconfined QCP if two opposite flows break different symmetries. Must be strongly coupled CFT. No U(1) spin liquid.
63
Statements 1. O(6) NLSM-WZW describes competing physics beyond-LGW .
2. O(6) NLSM-WZW describes a different class from one of CP(1) in 4D. (The former has anomaly but the latter does not) (Qualitatively different from 3D) 3. Deconfined QC requires relevant operators which requires strongly interacting fixed points for S. 4. If a system with Weyl points (Nd2Ir2O7?) become a symmetric paramagnetic insulator, then it should be a gapless spin-liquid.
64
Conclusions 1. Anomaly is cool.
2. Not only in transports of WSM/DSM but also in competing order physics! 3. Realization : Weyl semi-metals in pyrochlore (8 Weyl points ) → charge gapped : anomaly enforced gapless spin liquid! (thermal conductivity!)
65
Thank you for your attention!
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.