Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published bySophie Turner Modified over 6 years ago
1
Social Psychology PSY450 Instructor: Briana (Seay) Harvey
Welcome! Social Psychology PSY450 Instructor: Briana (Seay) Harvey
2
Outline What is Social Cognition? Attributions Why Did That Happen?
Mental errors
3
What is Social Cognition?
Thinking about people and social relationships Inner processes serve interpersonal functions Social acceptance, relationship formation and maintenance Competing against others for our goals
4
Why people think, and why they don’t
Cognitive Miser: term used to describe people’s reluctance to do much thinking
5
Knowledge Structure Organized packet of information stored in the memory Automatic thinking When a set of related concepts is brought to mind, eventually thinking of one part of the set activates the other related concepts Schemas & Scripts
6
Knowledge Structures Schemas: represent substantial information about a concept, its attributes, and its relationships to other concepts Basic, quick knowledge of a concept Helps us organize and interpret information Example: Dancing: rhythm, movement, coordination Dog: fur, ears, tail, 4 legs...
7
Knowledge Structures Scripts: define situations and guide behavior
Info about how people behave in varying circumstances Learned from experience or observation of others Example: Grocery shopping: Getting cart Pick items Waiting in line Stranger bags your items
8
Interpreting Knowledge....
We do not always know the truth about why we think the way we do… How information is presented will greatly affect how it is interpreted.
9
Think of a Fruit.
10
Priming!
11
Priming Priming: planning or activating an idea in someone’s mind
Influences subsequent thinking May trigger automatic processes
12
Priming
13
Framing Framing: whether messages stress potential gains (positively framed) or potential losses (negatively framed) Politicians call it “spin” Would you like a hamburger that is 10% fat or 90% lean?
14
Framing Gain-framed appeal
“Brush you teeth for beautiful, healthy smile!” Loss-framed appeal “If you don’t brush your teeth, you’ll get cavities!”
15
Thought Suppression Two processes to suppress thought
Automatic thought suppression Checks for incoming information related to unwanted thought Controlled thought suppression Redirects attention away from unwanted thought
16
Think of anything BUT a white bear…
Thought Suppression For the next 5 seconds... Think of anything BUT a white bear…
17
Did it work?...
18
It’s the Thought That Counts (or Doesn‘t Count!) the Calories
Dieters and non-dieters will eat different amounts of food based on eating pattern Milkshakes and ice cream (Herman & Mack, 1975) Counterregulation: “What the heck” effect… When people indulge in a behavior they are trying to regulate after an initial failure
19
Figure 5.6 Nondieters who had had a milkshake ate less ice cream; dieters who had had milkshakes ate more ice cream!
20
Exercise List a course you did well in List 5 reasons why
List a course you have done your worst in
21
Attributions: Explaining Success and Failure
Two-dimensional attribution theory Internal/External Stable/Unstable Self-serving bias: Tendency to take credit for success but deny blame for failure Like self-handicapping!
23
The Actor/Observer Bias
Tendency for actors to make external attributions and observers to make internal attributions External vs. Internal Attribution If it is you: Actor (situation – external) If it is someone else: Observer (actor – internal)
24
Fundamental Attribution Error
Explain someone's behavior based on their internal attributes, not the external attributes (situation) Related to the actor/observer bias
25
Example Jones & Harris (1967)
Participants assigned to read an essay either supporting or against Fidel Castro(communist leader of Cuba) Half the participants were told the essay view was assigned (Must write supporting Castro) Half the participants were told the essay writer chose their own view Then asked to estimate the student’s true attitude
26
Even though participants were told the students didn't’ have an option they still attributed the true belief to being Pro Castro
27
Attributions Attributions: casual explanations people give for their own and other’s behaviors, and for events in general Can be external or internal
28
Video fundamental-attribution-error-its-situation-not-person
29
Ultimate Attribution Error
Ultimate Attribution Error: Make an internal attribution error to a WHOLE group of people
30
Fundamental Attribution Error
Possible explanations Behavior is more noticeable than situational factors People assign insufficient weight to situational causes even when aware of them People are cognitive misers Richer trait-like language to explain behavior
31
Basically…. We judge others by their actions but judge ourselves by our intentions
32
Attribution Error and Making Excuses
Covariation Principle: For something to be the “cause” of a behavior it must be present when behavior occurs, and absent when it doesn’t
33
Attribution Error and Making Excuses
Three factors in Covariation Principle (Attribution cube): Consensus Would other people do the same thing in that situation? Consistency Does this person always behave in this way? Distinctiveness Would they behave differently in a different situation?
34
People generally make an external attribution when consensus, consistency, and distinctiveness are all high People generally make an internal attribution when consistency is high, but consensus and distinctiveness are low Other combinations lead to ambiguous attributions
35
Top is an INTERNAL attribution
Bottom is an external attribution
37
Attribution Error and Making Excuses
In making excuses for others’ behavior: Raise consensus “It happens to everyone” Lower consistency “It doesn’t usually happen to me” Raise distinctiveness “It doesn’t usually happen in other situations” Example: a friend not saying “hi” in the hallway
38
Errors and Biases Information overload
Too much information to comprehend or integrate More likely to make mental errors The automatic system helps people deal with this overload
39
Errors and Biases Statistical information
Generally access two types of information: Statistical information What the “Population” thinks/feels/likes Case history What my friends and I think/feel/like Generally pay closer attention to case history
40
Errors and Biases Confirmation Bias
Tendency to notice and search for information that confirms one’s beliefs and ignore information that disconfirms it
41
Errors and Biases Illusory Correlation
Tendency to overestimate link between variables that are related only slightly or not at all
42
Illusory Correlation Superstitions Stereotyping Placebo effect
It always rains after you wash the car The phone always rings when you are in the shower Librarians are quiet Doctors are wealthy
43
Errors and Biases Base Rate Fallacy
Tendency to ignore base rate information and be influenced by distinctive features of the case Examples: “Hot Hand” Luck will continue Gambler’s Fallacy Bad luck will “even out”; will win next time....
44
Base Rate Fallacy I flip a coin 10 times.
Flips 1-9 are heads; what will flip 10 be? a. Heads b. Tails c. Could be either Hot Hand: a Gambler’s fallacy: b Real Answer: c
45
Errors and Biases False Consensus Effect
Tendency to overestimate the number of other people who share one’s opinions, attitudes, values, and beliefs
46
False Consensus Effect
This may be because our friends and people we spend time with are like us Use the Availability Heuristic to deduce that many other people are similar (our own beliefs, etc. are also very available) Experiment: Wear this sandwich board advertisement? (Ross, Amabile, & Steinmetz,1977)
47
Errors and Biases False Uniqueness Effect
Tendency to underestimate the number of other people who share one’s prized characteristics or abilities For example: Exercise, Yoga, religious beliefs etc..
48
False effects People overestimate consensus when it comes to their undesirable characteristics (false consensus) People underestimate consensus when it comes to their desirable characteristics (false uniqueness) Unique in ability, common in belief
49
Errors and Biases Statistical Regression
Statistical tendency for extremes to be followed by less extreme or those closer to average VS.
50
Errors and Biases Illusion of Control
A false belief that one can influence events, especially random or chance ones For example Gamblers roll hard for high numbers, rolls soft for small numbers
51
Errors and Biases Counterfactual Thinking
Imagining alternatives to past or present events or circumstances Example: First Instinct Fallacy: Think that your first response to a question is “instinctually” correct, even after doubt of choice
52
Errors and Biases Upward counterfactuals – imagining positive outcome
Help make future situations better “what if I studied for that test better…” Downward counterfactuals – imagining negative outcome Comfort it could have been worse “what if I was also sick to my stomach while taking the test…”
53
Too much information... Shortcuts = Heuristics
Our daily lives are overflowing with old and new information to process. In order to think quickly, we use our automatic processes, and our minds take shortcuts. Often lead to error Shortcuts = Heuristics
54
Heuristics = Mental Shortcuts
Representativeness Heuristic Judge likelihood of uncertain event based on how much it resemble the typical case Example: vs. People tend to ignore other factors that influence actual frequencies and likelihoods
55
Representativeness Heuristic
Mike is a 41 year old man who like to read non-fiction books, listens to National Public Radio and plays tennis in his spare time. Which is more likely? a. Mike is an Ivy League professor b. Mike is a truck driver Rely on representativeness vs. Rely on statistics
56
Heuristics = Mental Shortcuts
Availability Heuristic Judge likelihood of event by the ease with which relevant instances come to mind Biased toward vivid, unusual, or emotionally charged examples Example: After “Jaws” movie came out, people were too scared to swim in ocean.
57
Availability Heuristic
Consider these pairs of causes of death: Lung Cancer vs. Motor Vehicle Accidents Emphysema vs. Homicide Tuberculosis vs. Fire and Flames From each pair, choose the one you think causes more deaths in the US each year.
59
Heuristics = Mental Shortcuts
Simulation Heuristic Judge likelihood of event based on how easy you can imagine it Example: Kim and Ryan, two separate flights Driving to airport, stuck in traffic for 40 minutes BOTH missed their flights Kim learns that her flight left on time Ryan learns his flight was delayed 30 minutes Who is more upset?
60
Who is the Silver medalist?
61
Heuristics = Mental Shortcuts
Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic Judge likelihood of event by using a starting point (anchor) and adjusting from that point Example: What % of United Nations is made of African nations? Spin wheel Rigged to stop on 10 or 65
62
Anchoring and Adjustment Heuristic
Average answers For participants who rolled a 10: 25% For participants who rolled a 65: 45% Should have made similar estimates but instead both groups stayed close to their random anchor!
63
Are people really idiots?
People are cognitive misers Use “Psycho-logic” instead of logic Rely on automatic system and use heuristics HOWEVER: Errors are not that bad however Most corrected over time, socially People tend to use conscious system when making important decisions
64
Reducing Cognitive Errors
Debiasing thoughts: USE Controlled Processing (conscious reasoning) Consider multiple alternative Rely less on memory Use explicit decision rules Use meta-cognition (thinking about thinking)
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.