Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byHarvey Cummings Modified over 6 years ago
1
Therapy 2.0: 2nd Consortium Meeting in Fürth, Germany
21-22 March 2017 Results of the Online Survey on Experiences, Needs & Expectations Presentation by: Evelyn Schlenk (ILI)
2
Survey: Who are the respondents?
Total number of fully completed questionnaires: 252 Remarks: Most questionnaires were completed after an campaing Exception: Austria questionnaires were completed in the context of an event – according to the answers, the sample seems to be less technophilic than the others Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
3
Survey: Who are the respondents?
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
4
Survey: Who are the respondents?
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
5
Survey: Who are the respondents?
Remarks: „Other“ is composed e.g. of teachers, psychologists, supervisors, teachers of children with special needs Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
6
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Iceland: very high ratings for „ “ (100 %) and „Social Media“ (76%) Greece: leading in Audio (53%) and Video conference (56%) Austria: ½ , ½ None Slovenia: high usage of all types of media, leading in Apps (46%) Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
7
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
8
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Facebook: exception Austrian sample: 0% Category „Other“: range between 0% (Croatia) and 100% (Austria) Other: Website, LinkedIn / Xing, Google+ Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
9
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Leading in „None“: Austrian sample (77%) Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
10
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Answered by 86.9% of the total sample 75.80% gave a rating on the scale between very negative very positive => more people than the 40% with experiences expressend an opinion 52.97% expressed a positive or very positive opinion Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
11
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Answered by 61.51% of the total sample Category „Other“ was often used to confirm the categories ticked before, especially: „high importance of personal contact“, „safety issues“, „lack of knowledge“, and new aspect: „no demand so far“ Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
12
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Answered by 61.51% of the total sample Countries answered quite smiliar, exception: Slovenian sample leading in „cost efficiency“ (54%) and „new business field“ (50%) Icelandic sample has high values in each category Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
13
Survey: Experiences with e-tools
Remarks: Answered by 100% of the total sample Leading in expressing concerns is the German sample (high values in each category) Greek sample: least concerns regarding the lack of noncerbal communication (50%). Reason probably: video conferencing? Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
14
Survey: Most common problems of young adults
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
15
Survey: Country differences of top 8 topics (%) (I)
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
16
Survey: Country differences of top 8 topics (%) (II)
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
17
Survey: Needs and Expectations
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
18
Survey: Needs and Expectations
Remarks: Austrian sample: highest interest in „collection of informative tools“ (85%) and least interest in face-to-face training event (8%) Greek and Slovenian sample: highest interest in online training program (63%) and (55%) Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
19
Survey: Interest in Therapy 2.0 Training Activities
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
20
Survey: Interest in Therapy 2.0 Training Activities
Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
21
Survey: Summary Sample 252 persons from 7 countries About 80% female
1/3 aged between years Wide range of years of experience from 0-25 years About 50% advisors, 42% therapists, 20% other Usage of e-tools (above 74%), Social Media (30%), Video Conference (27%) Service promoted by Social Media (about 40%): mainly Facebook (86%) and Other (35%) = Website, LinkedIn PC is the main hardware device (about 70%) Experiences with e-tools More than 50% expressed a positive or very positive opinion towards e-tools in counselling/therapy, 25% have no experiences In case of rare usage of e-tools it is because it seems to be „too impersonal“ (50%) and „not safe enough“ (34 %) – NOT because they think that online counselling and/or therapy is not effective (12%)!! Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
22
8 most common problems of young adults
Perceived advantages „Flexibility of place“ (75%), „flexibility of time“ (67%), „easier access for some target groups“ (56%), „reaching new groups of persons in need“ (52%) Perceived Challenges „Lack of nonverbal communication“ (72%), „not appropriate for all problems/topics“ (63%), „potential misunderstandings“ (57%) 8 most common problems of young adults Family problems (69%), anxiety disorder (68%), depression (55%), lacking skills for conflict resolution (50%) and communication (49%), learning difficulties (49%), alcoholic/drug abuse (42%), bullying/cyberbullying (40%) => Topics from both areas counselling and therapy Needs & Expectations on Therapy 2.0 Topics: „experiences of colleagues“ (72%), „privacy aspects“ (49%), „ethical aspects“ (47%), „communication depending on the medium“ (42%) Delivery: „as a collection of informative tools provided on a web portal“ (64%) Interest in participation in training activities: yes (49%), maybe (37%) Therapy 2.0 – 2nd Consortium Meeting – Survey Results 21 – 22 March 2017
23
How valid is the outcome in the scientific community?
Discussion: How valid is the outcome in the scientific community? It‘s not representative, it is applied research (real, „dirty“ data) => showing a trend, leading to assumptions Sample: different countries (+) Base for our own discussion, it gives good ideas Stimulate discussions in scientific events Have another survey at a later time / end of the project to compare results What are wie going to do with the outcomes now? Feed the content with the results Fachtagung Digital Kompass
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.