Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Issues in global precipitation estimation for hydrologic prediction

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Issues in global precipitation estimation for hydrologic prediction"— Presentation transcript:

1 Issues in global precipitation estimation for hydrologic prediction
Dennis P. Lettenmaier, Nathalie Voisin, and John C. Schaake, Jr. EGU 2009, NH 1.1, Precipitation Science April 22, 2009

2 The problem: Sparse precipitation station coverage in many land areas: Can remote sensing or NWP analysis fields fill the gap? Parana Paraguay Uruguay Lower Basin

3 Global precipitation data sets
Adam et al 2006 (gauge based) ERA-40 GPCP 1DD GPCP 1DD v A2006 ERA-40 v A2006 ERA-40 v GPCP 1DD

4 Pan Arctic Water Surface Balance
Yenisei basin

5 Pan Arctic Water Surface Balance
Lena basin

6 Pan Arctic Water Surface Balance
Ob basin

7 Pan Arctic Water Surface Balance
Mackenzie basin

8 La Plata Basin TRMM 3B42 RP vs. gridded observations -- daily

9 La Plata Basin -- TRMM 3B42 RP vs. gridded observations -- monthly

10 Precipitation evaluation- spatial fields
Gauge TMPA V.6 Annual mean precipitation over La Plata basin from gridded gauge, TMPA V.6 (gauge adjusted), TMPA-RT, CMORPH, and PERSIANN estimates for the years mm/yr Difference of annual precipitation between satellite and gauge estimates. mm/yr 10

11 Bias relative to gauge estimates for each year ( 2003, 2004, and 2005).
The bias significantly decreased in 2005 over basins 3802 and 6598 for the three real-time satellite precipitation products. 11

12 Spatial fields of annual mean simulated runoff (2003-2005)
Gauge TMPA V.6 Annual mean simulated runoff forced by the gauge, TMPA V.6, TMPA-RT, CMORPH, and PERSIANN estimates for the years mm/yr Difference of annual simulated runoff between satellite-driven and gauge-observation-driven simulations. mm/yr 12

13 Daily simulated streamflow for basin 3802, Uruguay at Paso de los Libres (Area: 189, 300km2, Jan 2003~Aug 2006) Simulated with satellite Precip Simulated with gauge Precip Bias TMPA (%) RT (%) CMORPH (%) PERSIANN (%) 2003 20 110 105 2004 32 120 142 73 2005 22 39 55 17 13

14 FIG. 7. Spatial fields of annual mean precipitation (mm/yr) from this study (a), CRU (b), VasclimO (c), and ERA-40 reanalysis (d) for La Plata Basin ( ).

15 Some questions What can the hydrology community do to persuade the satellite precipitation product community (and program managers) to produce reanalyses of satellite only products that can be tested in a hydrologic setting? Are we better off assimilating satellite data in NWPs, and using the analysis fields as our best estimates of precipitation, in lieu of precipitation estimates made directly from satellite sensors (e.g., TMPA, CMORPH, etc)? Who is doing such an evaluation, which seems critical as the GPM era draws near?


Download ppt "Issues in global precipitation estimation for hydrologic prediction"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google