Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Retina Centre of Ottawa Clinical Trials
Neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) (HAWK) Managing neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) over 2 years with a treat and extend (T&E) regime of 2mg intravitreal (IVT) aflibercept-a randomized, open-label, active-controlled, parallel-group phase IV/IIIb study (ARIES) To describe the use of intravitreal aflibercept and to describe follow-up as well as treatment patterns in patients with wet age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) or diabetic macular edema (DME) in routine clinical practice in Canada (PEGASUS) An open-label, randomized, active-controlled, parallel-group, phase-3b study of the efficacy, safety, and tolerability of 2mg aflibercept administered by intravitreal injections using two different treatment regimes to subjects with neovascular age-related macular degeneration (wAMD) (AZURE)
2
STUDY OF EFFICACY & SAFETY OF PRE-FILLED SYRINGES OF
RANIBIZUMAB PREPARED BY A COMPOUNDING PHARMACY FOR wAMD, DME and CVO (W. Britton, MD; R. Tuli, MD; T. Lee, MD; A. Leslie; A. Vanderlinden; J. Massé)
3
BACKGROUND Vascular Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) is a protein which is a key regulator of angiogenesis + inflammation. Overproduction (up regulation) results in growth + leakage of abnormal blood vessels.
4
BACKGROUND Up regulation of VEGF is seen in:
Neovascular Age Related Macular Degeneration (wAMD) Diabetic Macular Edema (DME) Central Retinal Vein Occlusion (CVO)
5
BACKGROUND Ranibizumab (Lucentis) is a recombinant, humanized monoclonal antibody specifically designed for intraocular use to neutralize all isoforms of VEGF-A.
6
BACKGROUND Ranibizumab is highly effective in improving + maintaining vision for patients with: Neovascular AMD Diabetic Macular Edema Cystoid Macular Edema secondary to Central Retinal Vein Occlusion
7
BACKGROUND Monthly injections of Ranibizumab are the standard of care for: wAMD DME CVO
8
BACKGROUND Ranibizumab is supplied in a sterile vial.
It takes seconds to aspirate the drug into a TB syringe and apply the appropriate needle at the bedside. This is done for every patient.
9
BACKGROUND EACH retina surgeon at the RETINA CENTRE OF OTTAWA (RCO) does this approximately 50 times per day for each working day in the office. This means that about 60 minutes per day, per retinal surgeon, is used to prepare Ranibizumab for intraocular injection.
10
BACKGROUND 60 minutes translates into over 12% of a standard work day just to prepare the drug!
11
BACKGROUND FDA requires that a drug be stable for 2 years in the supplied container. Makers of Ranibizumab tried for 7 years to develop a syringe which would keep this drug stable for the mandatory 2 year period.
12
PURPOSE OF STUDY Evaluate efficacy + safety of prefilled syringes of Ranibizumab prepared by a local compounding pharmacy and delivered intravitreally within 24 hours of preparation.
13
METHOD Patients with wAMD, DME or macular edema secondary to CVO who received intravitreal Ranibizumab (0.5 mg) from prefilled syringes prepared between November 2014 – June 2016 were randomly selected from the patient population of the RETINA CENTRE OF OTTAWA.
14
METHOD Inclusion Criteria wAMD, DME or CVO VA 20/30 – 20/400
OCT on each appointment Minimum of 6 visits (4-8 weeks apart)
15
METHOD Selected patients were categorized by: Disease process
Treatment naïve vs Previously Treated (actively receiving Anti-VEGF injections prior to prefilled syringes)
16
METHOD 6 separate groups of patients were studied: wAMD Prior Treat
Treat Naïve wAMD Prior Treat DME CVO
17
wAMD n Values Treat Naïve n= 77 wAMD Prior Treat n= 132
18
DME n Values Treat Naïve n= 37 DME Prior Treat n= 42
19
CVO n Values Treat Naïve n= 15 CVO Prior Treat n= 22
20
METHOD Primary Outcome Secondary Outcomes
Visual acuity (Snellen converted to ETDRS Letter Score) Secondary Outcomes OCT central retinal thickness Percentage of 20/40 or better gainers Percentage of 20/200 or worse Percentage gaining ≥ 15 ETDRS letters Average # injections Study period was 6 consecutive visits (4-8 weeks apart) for each patient Serious adverse events (SAE’s) recorded
21
VISUAL ACUITY RESULTS
22
wAMD Visual Acuity N=77 N=77
23
DME Visual Acuity
24
CVO Visual Acuity
25
CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS OCT RESULTS
26
wAMD Central Retinal Thickness OCT Changes
27
DME Central Retinal Thickness OCT Changes
28
CVO Central Retinal Thickness OCT Changes
29
PERCENTAGE 20/40 OR BETTER RESULTS
30
Snellen Equivalent of 20/40 or Better
Percentage of treatment naïve patients with vision of the Snellen equivalent of 20/40 or better at baseline and after 6 months of ranibizumab treatment.
31
PERCENTAGE 20/200 OR WORSE RESULTS
32
Snellen Equivalent of 20/200 or Worse
Percentage of treatment naïve patients with vision of the Snellen equivalent of 20/200 or worse at baseline and after 6 months of ranibizumab treatment.
33
GAINERS OF ≥ 15 LETTERS RESULTS
34
Gains of ≥ 15 ETDRS Letters
Percentage of treatment naïve patients who gained 15 or more ETDRS letters from baseline to 6 months of ranibizumab treatment.
35
AVERAGE # INJECTIONS
36
AVERAGE # INJECTIONS (6 VISITS)
GROUP Tx Naïve Prev. Tx wAMD DME CVO
37
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS
38
SERIOUS ADVERSE EVENTS
wAMD DME CVO TX Naïve Previous TX Endophthalmitis Myocardial Infarction 1 Stroke Death
39
DISCUSSION
40
DISCUSSION To put our data into perspective, we compared our TREATMENT NAÏVE groups with published results from key pivotal clinical trials.
41
wAMD VISUAL ACUITY RESULTS (Tx NAÏVE)
STUDY Mean ∆ ETDRS Letters RCO HARBOR (RCO n= 77, HARBOR n= 275)
42
DME VISUAL ACUITY RESULTS (Tx NAÏVE)
STUDY Mean ∆ ETDRS Letters RCO RISE (RCO n= 37, RISE n= 125)
43
CVO VISUAL ACUITY RESULTS (Tx NAÏVE)
STUDY Mean ∆ ETDRS Letters RCO CRUISE (RCO n= 15, CRUISE n= 130)
44
wAMD CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS (Tx NAÏVE)
STUDY CRT (µm) RCO HARBOR (RCO n= 77, HARBOR n= 275)
45
DME CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS (Tx NAÏVE)
STUDY CRT (µm) RCO RISE -210 (RCO n= 37, RISE n= 125)
46
CVO CENTRAL RETINAL THICKNESS (Tx NAÏVE)
STUDY CRT (µm) RCO -179 CRUISE (RCO n= 15, CRUISE n= 130)
47
wAMD % ≥ 20/40 (Tx Naïve) STUDY STUDY BASELINE END % CHANGE RCO 18.2% 36.4% +18.2% HARBOR N/A 52.4% N/A (RCO n= 77, HARBOR n= 275)
48
DME % ≥ 20/40 (Tx Naïve) STUDY STUDY BASELINE END % CHANGE RCO 16.2% 43.2% +27% RISE 19.2% 39.2% +20% (RCO n= 37, RISE n= 125)
49
CVO % ≥ 20/40 (Tx Naïve) STUDY STUDY BASELINE END % CHANGE RCO 6.7% 20% +13.3% CRUISE 5.4% 46.9% +41.5% (RCO n= 15, CRUISE n= 130)
50
wAMD % ≤ 20/200 (Tx Naïve) STUDY STUDY BASELINE END % CHANGE RCO 35.1% 10.4% -24.7% HARBOR N/A 7.3% N/A (RCO n= 77, HARBOR n= 275)
51
DME % ≤ 20/200 (Tx Naïve) STUDY STUDY BASELINE END % CHANGE
RCO 27% 8.1% % RISE 8% N/A N/A (RCO n= 37, RISE n= 125)
52
CVO % ≤ 20/200 (Tx Naïve) STUDY STUDY BASELINE END % CHANGE
RCO 46.7% 20% % CRUISE 30% 11.5% -18.5% (RCO n= 15, CRUISE n =130)
53
wAMD ≥ 15 ETDRS LETTER GAINERS
STUDY ≥ 15 LETTER GAINERS RCO 29% HARBOR 34.5% (RCO n= 77, HARBOR n= 275)
54
DME ≥ 15 ETDRS LETTER GAINERS
STUDY ≥ 15 LETTER GAINERS RCO % RISE % (RCO n= 37, RISE n= 42)
55
CVO ≥ 15 ETDRS LETTER GAINERS
STUDY ≥ 15 LETTER GAINERS RCO % CRUISE % (RCO n= 15, CRUISE n= 130 )
56
wAMD AVERAGE # INJECTIONS (Tx Naïve)
AVERAGE # STUDY INJECTIONS RCO 5.08 HARBOR 7
57
DME AVERAGE # INJECTIONs (Tx Naïve)
AVERAGE # STUDY INJECTIONS RCO 5.22 RISE 7
58
CVO AVERAGE # INJECTIONS (Tx Naïve)
AVERAGE # STUDY INJECTIONS RCO 5.27 CRUISE 7
59
CONCLUSIONS
60
CONCLUSIONS Visual acuity results demonstrated that the efficacy of Ranibizumab placed in syringes by compounding pharmacy within 24 hours of use is equal to that achieved when the drug is drawn up immediately prior to delivery for wAMD, DME and CVO. Visual acuity improvements were achieved with fewer # injections than in key pivotal trials.
61
CONSLUSIONS CRT reduction was less robust than that achieved in pivotal clinical trials. This could be explained by REAL WORLD treatment regimes. This also highlights the relative disconnect between Visual Acuity improvements and reduction in leakage as measured by Central Retinal Thickness on OCT.
62
CONSLUSIONS SAE’s were consistent with comparable Ranibizumab trials and in keeping with age and underlying systemic disorders of our patient population. Most importantly, there were no cases of endophthalmitis in any of our patients.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.