1. Planning for People, Processes, Priorities and Progress
Syed Zahoor Hassan, PhD Professor, SDSB, LUMS Former Vice Chancellor LUMS
Shaukat Ali Brah, PhD Founding (and Former) Rector KSBL Former Professor & Dean KSBL, AGU and LUMS
April 28-29, 2017

2. Planning
Being busy does not always mean real work. The object of all work is production or accomplishment and to either of these ends there must be forethought, system, planning, intelligence, and honest purpose, as well as perspiration. Seeming to do is not doing.
Thomas A. Edison

3. Outline Levels of Institutional Planning
Positioning of the “Business School”
Faculty Planning
Research and Development Plan
Student Progression Plan
Student Services Planning
Resource Planning
Social Responsibility
Academic and Business Linkages

4. Levels of Institutional Planning
Strategic
Institutional objectives and goals
Implementation plan
Operational
“Business School” and department plans
Tactical
Policies and procedures

5. Positioning of the “Business School”
Research intensive
Research school
Mixed school
Teaching school
Teaching intensive

6. Strategic Planning: Faculty
Policies
Recruitment, retention, remuneration, promotion and development
Student to faculty ratios
Size and qualification
Distinctive expertise
Engagement with professional bodies

7. Strategic Planning: Faculty
Source: 2013 AACSB International Accreditation Standards

8. Faculty Mix: Research Institution
Faculty Type Percent of Faculty
Scholarly Academics  70 (Research or tenure track)
Practice Academics  20 (Teaching track)
Scholarly/Instructional Practitioners  10 (Practice track)

9. Faculty Mix: Mixed Institution
Faculty Type Percent of Faculty
Scholarly Academics  60 (Research or tenure track)
Practice Academics  30 (Teaching track)
Scholarly/Instructional Practitioners  10 (Practice track)

10. Faculty Mix: Teaching Institution
Faculty Type Percent of Faculty
Scholarly Academics  40 (Research or tenure track)
Practice Academics  40 (Teaching track)
Scholarly/Instructional Practitioners  20 (Practice track)

11. Student to Faculty Ratio: Undergrad
Institution Type Student to Faculty Ratio (Undergraduate)
Research intensive institution  10
Research institution  15
Mixed institution  25
Teaching institution  40
Teaching intensive institution  50

12. Student to Faculty Ratio: Graduate
Institution Type Student to Faculty Ratio (Graduate)
Research intensive institution  08
Research institution  10
Mixed institution  15
Teaching institution  20

13. Faculty Workload
Institution Type Average Faculty Workload (Credit Hours/Year)
Research intensive institution  09
Research institution  12
Mixed institution  18
Teaching institution  24
Teaching intensive institution  36

14. Faculty Size: Mixed Institution
Year 1
Year 2
Year 3
Year 4
Total
No of Students
250
220
210
200
880
Average Credit Hours/Student 36 33
138
Ave Credit Hours (Business School) 18 21 24 27 90
FTE Students (Business School)
125
128
153
164
570
FTE Students (Other Schools)
122 47
330
FTE Faculty (Business School) 10 8
FTE Student = ∑ (Number of Students Enrolled in a Course i) x (Credit Hours of Course i) Credit Hours of a Full-Time Student

15. Faculty Size: Mixed Institution
Year 5 (Full-Time)
Year 5 (Part-Time)
Year 6 (Full-Time)
Year 6 (Part-Time)
Total
No of Students 50
100 45 80
275
Average Credit Hours/Student 30 18 60
Ave Credit Hours (Business School) 27 15 54
FTE Students (Business School) 48
188
FTE Students (Other Schools) 5 10
FTE Faculty (Business School)
3.3 4 3
3.2
14

16. Faculty Mix Plan: Mixed Institution
Finance
Account
HR/OB
Market
Mang. Science
Total
FTE Undergrad Students
200
150
900
FTE Graduate Students 50 20 40 43
203
FTE Faculty Undergrad 8 6 36
FTE Faculty Graduate 4 1 3 14
FTE Faculty 7 9 11

17. Faculty Composition: Mixed Institution
Faculty Type Faculty Positions
Research or tenure track 30
Teaching track 15
Practice track 05
Total 50

18. Strategic Planning: Research and Development (R&D)
Research and development (R&D) policy
Time for R&D
R&D funding
Quality of research output
Contribution of R&D to curriculum, faculty development and consulting

19. Strategic Planning: Students
Student enrolment
Scholarships and financial aid
Student progression and individual learning
Personal grooming and interpersonal skills
Student counselling and guidance
Extracurricular or co-curricular activities
Average success percentage

20. Strategic Planning: Student Support Services
Admissions office
Program coordination office
Examination monitoring cell
Sports, extra and co-curricular activities office
Internship and placement office

21. Strategic Planning: Resources
Learning environment
Library and computing facilities
Financial management system
Administrative support function
Quality enhancement cell

22. Strategic Planning: Social Responsibility
Code of moral principles, ethics, behaviors and conducts
Development and participation in community services and social activities
Development and protection of internal community
Impact on the society

23. Strategic Planning: Academic and Business Linkages
Participation in academic governance
National and international academic linkages
Student and faculty exchange programs
Alumni network
Corporate linkages and relations

24. Concluding Thought
“Unless commitment is made, there are only promises and hopes; but no plans.”
― Peter F Drucker