1. Impact of temperature and time storage on the microbial detection of oral samples by Checkerboard DNA–DNA hybridization method 
Cássio do Nascimento, Janine Navarro dos Santos, Vinícius Pedrazzi, Murillo Sucena Pita, Nadia Monesi, Ricardo Faria Ribeiro, Rubens Ferreira de Albuquerque 
Archives of Oral Biology 
Volume 59, Issue 1, Pages (January 2014)
DOI: /j.archoralbio
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

2. Fig. 1
Median (with maximum and minimum values), upper and lower quartiles of total counts (×105cells) of the 43 target species recovered from the proposed experimental protocols. Different letters mean significant differences sought by Friedman test followed by Dunn's post-test (E>B>C>A>D>F>G; p<0.0001).
Archives of Oral Biology  , 12-21DOI: ( /j.archoralbio )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

3. Fig. 2
Median (with maximum and minimum values), upper and lower quartiles of total microbial counts (×105 cells) evaluating period of storage. Different letters mean significant differences sought by Friedman test followed by Dunn's post-test (C>B>A>D; p<0.0001).
Archives of Oral Biology  , 12-21DOI: ( /j.archoralbio )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

4. Fig. 3
Median (with maximum and minimum values), upper and lower quartiles of total microbial counts (×105 cells) evaluating temperature of storage. Different letters mean significant differences sought by Friedman test followed by Dunn's post-test (A>C>B; p<0.0001).
Archives of Oral Biology  , 12-21DOI: ( /j.archoralbio )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions

5. Fig. 4
Mean of total incidence (%) of microbial species found in the tested protocols (*significant differences detected by two-way ANOVA followed by Bonferroni's post-test; p<0.05).
Archives of Oral Biology  , 12-21DOI: ( /j.archoralbio )
Copyright © 2013 Elsevier Ltd Terms and Conditions