Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Getting Technology to the Warfighter

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Getting Technology to the Warfighter"— Presentation transcript:

1 Getting Technology to the Warfighter
NDIA S&T Conference - Charleston Getting Technology to the Warfighter Ms. Sue Payton DUSD (AS&C)/Dep. DDR&E (Acting) April 20, 2005

2 Who is the Warfighter? Military Services
Core Military/Service-specific capability providers “…to organize, train and equip…” Joint Combatant Commands Military capability end-user – the warfighters

3 What are Joint Capabilities? AS&C Program Perspective
Multi-Service Core Military Capabilities. Common denominator Military forces provided worldwide as self- integrated, self-sustaining echelons by the Services. (Global Positioning System, Movement Tracking System) Joint Enabling Capabilities. Additional capabilities required by warfighters to exercise joint command, and to enable core military elements to function effectively as a coherent joint force. (Network Centric Operations, Common Operational Picture) Unique Regional/Specified Mission Requirements. Capabilities beyond common core military capabilities required by warfighters to effectively function in operational environments associated with assigned regional or specified missions. (Foliage Penetrating Radar, Language Translators) Joint is an inter-Service reliance acting together as one - not a patchwork of deconflicted Service operations. (General Tommy Franks, excerpts from American Soldier)

4 Are There Valid Requirements Beyond Service-Specific/Core Military Capabilities?
Characterization of Joint CoCom Requirements: Core Service-specific capabilities (~80%?) Joint Coalition military requirements (~20%?) Joint capability enablers (~10% - and growing) Tailored regional/specified requirements (~10%?)

5 AS&C Funding Split (FYDP) by Functional Capability Area
Dollars in Millions Total AS&C funding (Prior Years & Future) of Approximately 200 Projects $1.1 Billion Based on FY 2006 PresBud and Congressional Reports Includes: ACTD, FCT, DACP, and TTI

6 FY-2005 CoCom Funding Support
$2,668 Dollars in Millions $436 $334 $262 $271 $335 $140 $184 $29 Lead Service A = Army AF = Air Force N =Navy * Only JFCOM and SOCOM receive dedicated RDT&E program funds ** NORTHCOM and STRATCOM have limited Procurement funds Based on FY-05 PresBud Submit

7 Advanced Systems & Concepts
Rapidly placing relevant, mature technology into the hands of warfighters DoD’s resource for technology transition AS&C Partners with Services & Agencies to: Match technology to warfighting needs Overcome resistance to transformational concepts Ensure technology contributes to joint capabilities Provide joint warfighters with options for integrating service capabilities Transfer DoD technology to the private sector: An industry on-ramp and access to meeting warfighter needs ManTech’s Focal Plane Array Cooled and uncooled IRFPAs and components for the Near IR, Mid IR, and Long IR wavebands Raven UAV for small units from Pathfinder ACTD Defense Acquisition Challenge Aerogel for Ships: Fire barrier, IR Suppression, Blast Mitigation, Decreased Weight, Volume, Installation Costs, and Fuel Savings Title III’s Laser Protective Eyewear

8 AS&C Programs Addressing Acquisition Lifecycle Joint CoCom Customer
6.1 6.2 6.3 6.4 6.5 TRL 1 TRL 2 TRL 3 TRL 4 TRL 5 TRL 6 TRL 7 TRL 8 TRL 9 Concept & Technology Development System Development & Demonstration Production & Deployment Sustainment & Maintenance A B C Initial Product/ Process Capability Product/Process Development Product/Process Insertion Product/Process Improvement & Sustainment Joint Warfighting Program (JWP) ACTDs /JCTDs Defense Acquisition Challenge Foreign Comparative Testing Independent Research & Development This slide depicts the programs currently under AS&C direction to accomplish our technology transition mission. The diversity of programs reflects the many aspects of tech transition that must be covered to field capabilities. These programs accurately reflect both the “tech push” and the “requirements pull” aspects of the tech transition challenge. As these programs gravitated under AS&C’s umbrella, we discovered that they frequently feed and reinforce each other. For example, exercises underwritten by the Joint Warfighting Program can point out areas of joint capabilities that need new technologies and operational concepts. Successful tests and demonstrations may point to enhancements in the industrial base necessary to assure domestic sources of key technologies. Tech Link Manufacturing Technology Tech Transition Initiative Joint CoCom Customer Title III of the Defense Production Act Service/Agency Customer

9 FY 2006 AS&C Resources Overview (Direct Oversight of $325M) as of Feb 2005
Source: FY 2006 President’s Budget Program $M Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) (BA-3) $164 Joint Capability Technology Demonstration (JCTD) (BA-3/4/5 & Procure) $40 Joint Warfighting Program (JWP)-BA-3 $10 Foreign Comparative Testing (FCT)-BA-6 $36 Defense Production Act (DPA) Title III $13 Technology Transition Initiative (TTI)-BA-3 $30 TechLink (BA-3) $3 Defense Acquisition Challenge Pgm (DACP)-BA-5 $29 RDT&E/DW: $311M DPA Title III Procurement: $13M OSD Maj Equip-JCTD Procure: $1M

10 AS&C Industry Opportunities
Technology transition programs can work in harmony or independently, but they all share a common goal—to accelerate the best technologies available to the warfighter into residual capabilities, acquisition programs, and ongoing sustainment. Industry Through Labs Emergent Technology Sponsored by Lab Technology Transition Initiative (TTI) Technology Transfer AS&C FIELDED CAPABILITIES Into PORs, CoCom Budgets, GSA (With emphasis on joint missions) Accelerated Acquisition Programs and Initial Production Industry Through ACTDs and PORs Manufacturing Hurdles North American Trade Industrial Base Foreign Partners Review Manufacturing Technology DPA Title III Program Foreign Comparative Test NATIBO Committees Industry Direct to Transition Program Royalties and Patents Emergent and Innovative Technologies This slide is another way of portraying the mutually supportive aspect of AS&C’s tech transition programs. Why the emphasis on joint capabilities? Because the services do a great job of providing core military capabilities. Our OSD role comes in where we can achieve economies and dividends from multi-service efforts, and where joint combatant commanders have requirements that are not met by core military capabilities. TechLink – Tech Transfer Defense Acquisition Challenge Program

11 AS&C Programs www.acq.osd.mil/asc
Website Phone Advanced Concept Technology Demonstration (ACTD) (703) DPA Title III (703) Independent R & D Comparative Test Office (703) Def Acquisition Challenge (703) Technology Transfer (703) TechLink TechMatch NATIBO Dual Use S&T Tech. Transition Initiative (703) ManTech (703)

12 DUSD (AS&C)/Dep. DDR&E (Acting)
NDIA S&T Conference - Charleston QUESTIONS? Ms. Sue Payton DUSD (AS&C)/Dep. DDR&E (Acting) April 20, 2005


Download ppt "Getting Technology to the Warfighter"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google