1. Work-packages for 2011-2016, planning and status
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Work-packages for , planning and status

2. Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011):
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011):
First top-down resource evaluation (see next slides)
First work-package list available (

3. R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011, from Steinar’s slides):
Very preliminary
Activity
Description
Deliverables (2016)
Total material budget
Cost studies,
Civil engineering,
Proj, Implementation
Update and improve CLIC cost model & civil engineering studies
Technical Design (TD) and Project Implementation Plan (PIP) of CLIC Zero
Improved cost model, feedback to CLIC baseline review
4 MCHF
Beam physics studies
Beam physics and overall design
Review of the CLIC baseline design
Stability and alignment, timing and phasing, stray fields and dynamic vacuum
Studies towards CLIC Zero
3 MCHF
CTF3 +
CTF3 consolidation and upgrade
Consolidation and upgrade (higher energy, stability, reliability)
Drive beam phase feed-forward experiments
Upgrade and operate TBL as 12 GHz power production facility
Operation with beam of a long string of CLIC two-beam modules
43 MCHF
CLIC Zero
Injector for the CLIC drive beam generation complex
Build and commission 30 MeV Drive Beam injector with nominal CLIC parameters
Build and commission a few Drive Beam accelerator nominal modules
Participation to Technical Design of full CLIC Zero facility
42 MCHF
(~ 30 MCHF)
RF Structures
design and fabrication of 12 GHz accelerating structures & PETS
and associated R&D
Build and test about 120 accelerating structures
Build and test about 10 PETS prototype
Establish quality control, brazing and assembly procedures for structure fabrication at CERN
Precision machining center at CERN
29 MCHF
RF test infrastructure
Building, commissioning and operation
of high-power RF test stands
Four 12 GHz klystron-based RF high-power test stations, for about 8 slots, running before 2016
Continue high-power testing at 11.4 GHz (KEK and SLAC)
Contribution to high-power testing in CTF3+ (TBL)
13 MCHF
Prototypes of critical components
Technical R&D – design, build and test prototypes of CLIC critical components
R&D and prototypes of two-beam modules alignment and stabilization systems
Prototype of final focus quadrupole and stabilization system
Several nominal CLIC two-beam modules, mechanically tested, possibly beam tested
R&D and prototyping of critical beam instrumentation
Design and studies of machine protection system
DR superconducting wiggler prototypes, test with beam, extraction kickers prototypes
Dynamic vacuum assessment
Contribution to the CLIC Zero
DB RF system and powering
40 MCHF++
“Resource – drivers”

4. Ramp-up to about 30 MCHF/year in 2013
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011, from Steinar’s slides) – Material Budget:
Ramp-up to about 30 MCHF/year in 2013
Total integrated  150 MCHF
Assuming planned CERN contribution
(MTP 2010 – about 90 MCHF)
 need from collaborators 60 MCHF
Material contributions from outside CERN should rise from 20-25% (present level) up to more than 1/3

5. R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011, from Steinar’s slides) – Material Budget:
Ramp-up from about 110 to 170 FTE
Planned CERN contribution (MTP 2010) slightly decreasing!
However, in the MTP after 2011/2012 most of non-staff manpower is not accounted for
Taking this into account, the CERN manpower is substantially flat (however, a fraction of this will have to be provided by a material-to-personnel transfer)
 need from collaborators up to
~ 60 additional FTEs

6. Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011):
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Status at the last Collaboration Board (February 2011):
First top-down resource evaluation (see next slides)
First work-package list available (
Since then:
Discussions at 6 (out of 9) CLIC Accelerator Steering Committes
One-day CASC retreat (March 4th)
UK-CERN collaboration start-up meeting
But also new CERN MTP 2011

7. Some increase in Personnel budget
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
CERN MTP 2011
Some increase in Personnel budget
Material budget generally decreased by 7.3% due to a negative material indexation

8. Description of work-packages in some detail done (see next slides)
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Present Status:
Work-program organized in WPs covering from hardware (very straight-forward WPs) to working-groups (attempt to also describe as WPs)
Description of work-packages in some detail done (see next slides)
Including material and manpower profile over
Mainly top-down, but some input from CERN groups and collaborators in some areas
Some cuts in material budget already implemented…

9. CTF3 WP: CTF3-002 Purpose/Objectives/Goals: Deliverables Schedule
Drive Beam phase feed-forward and feedbacks
Purpose/Objectives/Goals:
Understand sources of drive beam phase jitter, develop and test feed-forward system to stabilize drive beam phase (performance, risk)
Deliverables
Schedule
Drive Beam phase monitors
Understand sources of drive beam phase jitter. Used in feedbacks and feed-forward test.
Drive Beam phase monitor prototype, phase monitor small series (2-3), electronics and acquisition. M budget: 0.5 MCHF
Monitor proto: 2011 – 4Q
Monitor series: 2013 – 2Q
Feed-forward kickers
Required to demonstrate feed-forward performance.
Two strip-line kickers. M budget: MCHF
2012 – 4Q
Feed-forward pulsers
Fast amplifiers for the two kickers. Fast electronics. M budget: MCHF
2013 – 4Q ?
Infrastructure and operation
Required for testing.
Cabling, infrastructure, controls, operational support. M budget: 0.5 MCHF
Distributed
Link to other WPs/activities: This WP depends on WP CTF3-001
Lead collaborator(s): INFN/LNF, Oxford Un./J. Addams, CERN: BE/RF, BE/BI, BE/ABP, BE/OP…
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Material (kCHF):
500
900
1100
300
200
3000
Personnel (FTE): 4 20
Resources comment: total and repartition to be reviewed with INFN-Frascati & Oxford. Likely delay of material resources
Other comments: First review with Oxford at UK kick-off. Problem with schedule – agreed on strategy (first stage at reduced performance, possibly with commmercial ampli (commercial 25 kW ampli 800 k$), compromise on power/bandwidth.

10. CLIC 0 WP: CLIC0-001 Purpose/Objectives/Goals: Deliverables Schedule
Drive Beam Front-End
Purpose/Objectives/Goals:
Assess CLIC drive beam injector/front-end performance, provide focus for development and industrialization of CLIC large series components (1 GHz MDKs and accelerating structures), constitute first building block of CLIC 0 (risk, cost)
Deliverables
Schedule
Design & preparation
Overall optimization of CLIC injector, study of implementation
Detailed design of facility, implementation plan
2012 – 4Q
Gun
Provide gun
Thermionic electron gun, HV deck and front-end controls
M budget: 1 MCHF
2013 – 4Q
RF structures
Provide structures for bunching system and acceleration.
Three 500 MHz wide-band sub-harmonic bunchers, one single-cell pre-buncher, one travelling wave buncher, 6 accelerating structures
M budget: 1.7 MCHF
SHBs: 2014 – 2Q
PB, buncher: 2014 – 4Q
Structures: 2015 – 4Q
RF high-power system
Provide RF high-power system
500 MHz sources (TWTs?), Four15 MW 1 GHz Modulators-Klystrons, waveguide networks, operational support
M budget: 16 MCHF
TWTs: 2014 – 2Q
2 MKS proto: 2014 – 4Q
MKS series: – 4Q
6 in 2016 – 4Q
RF low-power system
Provide RF low-power system
low-power systems , 500 MHz and 1 GHz, operational support
Protos: Q
Series: 2015 – 4Q
Magnets
Provide magnets
Solenoids, quadrupoles (about 12), four bending magnets, H-V dipole correctors
M budget: 2 MCHF
Solenoids/corr.: 2013 – 4Q
Quadrupoles: 2015 – 4Q
Bends: 2015 – 4Q
Vacuum
Provide vacuum system
Vacuum chambers, pumps, gauges, control system, operational support
Distributed 2013 – 2016

11. CLIC 0 WP: CLIC0-001 Purpose/Objectives/Goals: Deliverables Schedule
Drive Beam Front-End
continued
Purpose/Objectives/Goals:
Assess CLIC drive beam injector performance, provide focus for development and industrialization of CLIC large series components (1 GHz MDKs and accelerating structures), constitute first building block of CLIC 0 (risk, cost)
Deliverables
Schedule
Diagnostics
Provide diagnostics
BPMs - electrostatic (~4), BPMs - magnetic (~ 5) - transverse profile monitors (3), time resolved energy spectrum measurement, operational support. M budget: 1.3 MCHF
BPM e: 2013 – 4Q
BPM m: 2014 – 4Q
Monitors: 2013 – 2015
Spectro: 2014 – 4Q
Controls
Provide controls
Injector control system, operational support. M budget: 1 MCHF
Distributed 2013 – 2016
Civil Engineering & infrastructure
Provide building and infrastructure
Shielded hall, Cooling and ventilation, electrical equipment, cabling.
M budget: 4 MCHF
2013 – 4Q
Cabling Distr – 2016
Commissioning & operation
Provide commissioning and operation
Distributed
Link to other WPs/activities: This WP is linked to WP CTC-004
Lead collaborator(s): CERN: BE/RF, BE/BI, BE/ABP, BE/OP
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Material (kCHF):
1000 (500)
4000 (3000)
8000 (4250)
9000 (4250)
8000 (5000)
30000 (17000)
Personnel (FTE): 10 20 80
Resources comment: technical manpower partly shared with CTF3
500
3000
4250
5000
Other comments:
Modulator/Klystrons are on the critical path. Lower efficiency prototypes (direct scaling from ILC/X-FEL?) could arrive earlier, allowing to keep the schedule. Discussion with RF group needed. Option: delay program. First stage with minimum number of 1 GHz klystron prototypes (4), short pulse + compression. Full upgrade in (GAIN 13 MCHF)

12. Spending profile for integrated beam systems tests
200
R. Corsini, CASC
6 May 2011
CTF3+/CLIC 0
Spending profile for integrated beam systems tests

13. CTC-004 two-beam module development
CLIC Linkperson: G. Riddone
WP: CTC-004
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Task 1: Prototype design and fabrication
Engineering design of the two-beam modules, including eng. design of fully integrated components.
Fabrication and assembly of components
Girder R&D, integration of all module technologies
4 two-beam modules to be mechanically tested in a lab (generation 1)
3 two-beam modules to be mechanically tested in a lab (one future generation, second in )
3 two-beam modules to be tested with RF and beam in CLEX (generation 1)
2 two-beam modules to be tested with RF and beam in CLEX (future generation)
Task 2: Finite element simulations
Thermo-mechanical simulation of two-beam module behavior under different load conditions: estimation of resulting forces, deformations and stresses.
Application of results to engineering design
Technical report with results of simulations; feedback to taks 1
Task 3: Experimental comparison of predicted and modeled performance
Experimental tests of technical system performance (vacuum, cooling, alignment,..)
Experimental of overall module behavior under different load conditions
Comparison measured with expected results
Review of results and application to the engineering design
Realization of tests
Analysis of results

14. CTC-004 two-beam module development
WP: CTC-004
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Task 4: Alternative designs
Study of alternative module layout
Longer girders, common DB-MB girders, different materials
Longer RF structures
Permanent DB magnets
Mini-pumps replacing vacuum reservoir
New engineering design for the different options
Task 5: Industrialization
Towards cost optimization:
reduction of interconnections
reduction of components and module types
Reduction of machining and assembly steps
New module layout
New procedures
Lead collaborator(s): CERN (G. Riddone) ,
collaborators (HIP-K. Osterberg, NTUA-E. Gazis, CIEMAT-F. Toral, NCP-A.Nawaz,
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Material (kCHF):
1000
2000
2250
11000
M>P (kchF)
570
600
3000
P<M (FTE) 8 10 50
Personnel (FTE): 12 15 16 14 86
Other comments: total modules considered for construction: (see task 1); All deliverables for modules (Alignment, Stabilization, BI, vacuum, RF structures etc) paid by TBA module budget.

15. X-band Rf structure Production
WP: RF-xprod
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Task 1: Construction of baseline accelerating structures
Test structures for statistical and long term high-power testing with all damping features and high power couplers (for SATS and Test modules in CLEX)  we have to make sure that we count all the structures. including those for the CLEX modules
3 generations of test structures, total quantity 48, total cost ~6 MCHF.
12 in 2013
24 in 2015
12 in 2016
Task 2: Supply of small series development prototypes and/or medium power test structures
Test structures for full features (4), wakefield monitor equipped (4), optimized high-power design (8), different machine energy optima (4), optimized process (8), develop DDS (2) and choke (2), compressor (2)
Typically 12 variants in series of 4 structures each, total quantity 40, total cost ~6 MCHF.
8 structures per year
Task 3: Supply baseline PETS (note: most PETS fabrication accounted elsewhere, e.g. TBL)
PETS for statistical and long term high-power testing
4 PETS, total cost 0.2 MCHF.
3 in 2013
1 in 2015
Task 4: PETS for ON/OFF testing
PETS for on/ off test
2 generations 0.1 MCHF
Task 5: Alternative fabrication method
Explore alternative fabrication methods
Structure fabricated with alternative procedure
Task 5: Baseline to pre-series development
Take the fully tested x band rf Systems and evolve their production techniques to an industrialized process
2015 onwards
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
M (kCHF)
3000
3100
3300
34000
15800
M>P (kCHF)
500
600
700
P<M (FTE) 6 8 9 30
Fellows (FTE)
CERN Personnel (FTE): 2 10

16. X-band Rf structure High Power Testing
WP: RF-xtesting
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
High power testing of x band structures
Establish in collaboration with designers and producers a test-schedule for the facilities at CERN, KEK and SLAC
Organize manpower for the tests
define consolidation and repair needs
lead the data analysis of the tests
suggest changes to designs and/or fabrication
Structure Tests
Analysis of results
Link to other WPs/activities:
Lead collaborator(s):
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
M (kCHF)
150
200
250
1200
M>P (kCHF)
P<M (FTE) 3 4 5 24
Fellows (FTE) 18
CERN Personnel (FTE): 1 2 8
Resources comment:

17. Creation and Operation of x-band High power Testing Facilities
WP: RF-Testfac
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Task 1: High-power test stands
6 new klystron-based test stations with approximately 140 MW peak power each.
6 test stands. Cost of 0.5 MCHF per modulator, 1 MCHF per 50 MW klystron, 0.5 MCHF infrastructure. Total cost 12 MCHF plus operation.
2 in 2013
2 in 2014
2 in 2015
Task 2: Medium power, high rep rate test stand
2 test stands with 4x80 MW 100 Hz slots based on four 5 MW klystrons.
2 test stands. Cost of MCHF per modulator, 0.1 MCHF per 5 MW klystron, 0.25 MCHF infrastructure. Total cost 1.8 MCHF.
1 in 2013
1 in 2014
Task 3: Test stand operation
Operation of high power test facility at CERN: Provide high uptime, schedule maintenance and repair periods. Link to other test facilities.
Maintenance of installation, crews for maintenance
Link to other WPs/activities:
Lead collaborator(s):
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
M (kCHF)
3000
3200
2900
4900
2000
16000
M>P (kCHF)
100
200
500
1400
P<M (FTE) 2 3 7 21
Fellows (FTE)
CERN Personnel (FTE): 1 5
Resources comment: Rf engineer to lead work package is critical missing post

18. Two-Beam Acceleration
BPH-ML
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Optics
Objective: Provide optimised main beam line and drive beam decelerator design for cost reduction/performance improvement
Activities: Adjust lattice design to different gradients/energies
Optimise the focal strength for best performance/cost
Improved optics, report
Correction techniques
Study impact of hardware implementation details on beam-based alignment performance
Update the feedback design
report
Feedback layout, report
Performance studies
Improve the main linac modelling (e.g. multi-pole wakefields, multi-bunch wakefields, shape distortions,…)
Improved PLACET code

19. Two-Beam Acceleration (cont.)
BPH-ML
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Material (kCHF):
Personnel (FTE):
3 (0.4)
4 (0.4)
23 (2.4)
Resources need to be reviewed

20. Integrated Dynamic Studies
BPH-LUMI
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Determination of feedback layout
Objective: Provide a consistent feedback design across the areas
Description: Integrate area feedback systems into one coherent set of feedback systems
Baseline feedback layout
Controller design
Develop, adjust and optimise controller for performance, cost and risk
Code, report
System identification
Provide error estimate for controller system model
Report
Mechanical stability
Develop mechanical model and feedback on hardware development
Magnetic stray fields
Objective: Develop a concept to mitigate the impact of static and dynamic magnetic fields
Description: Participate to the determination of the level of fields
Determine the impact of the fields on the beam performance
Define further work depending on the outcome of the above studies

21. Integrated Dynamic Studies (cont)
BPH-LUMI
Purpose/Objectives/Goals
Deliverables
Schedule
Phase and amplitude stability
Objective: Develop an integrated concept to mitigate drive and main beam phase and amplitude errors
Description: Determine the impact of hardware on beam phase and amplitude stability
In collaboration with hardware experts identify critical hardware and required R&D
Identify and follow relevant beam tests
Design feedback and feed-forward systems
Optimise beam line design for stability
Report on concept of stabilisation
Report evidencing that the beam performance can be met with this system
Operation, commissioning and reliability
Objective: Develop the commissioning scenario
Develop a model of the operation
Address key reliability issues
Report on the commissioning scenario
Report on the operation
Report on reliability
CERN: BE-ABP, TE-MPE, EN-MEF, SYMME, Needs some increase
Resources:
2011
2012
2013
2014
2015
2016
Total
Material (kCHF):
Personnel (FTE):
6 (1.5)
36 (9)
SYMME resources depend on outcome of bid

22. Global – Material, reviewed
200
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Global – Material, reviewed
Total integrated: 140 MCHF
In CERN MTP: 86 MCHF
Needed from Collaboration: 64 MCHF over 5 years

23. Global – manpower (preliminary)
200
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Global – manpower (preliminary)
Ramp-up from about 110 to over 200 FTE
Planned CERN contribution (MTP 2010) slightly decreasing, however, in the MTP after 2011/2012 most of non-staff manpower is not accounted for
Taking this into account, the CERN manpower is substantially flat (however, a fraction of this will have to be provided by a material-to-personnel transfer)
 need from collaborators up to ~ 100 additional FTEs
Under review

24. Summary table Full info:
R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Summary table
Full info: (

26. Summary table R. Corsini, 13thCLIC/CTF3 Collaboration Board
Thursday 19 May 2011
Summary table

27. Manpower profile for integrated beam systems tests
200
R. Corsini, CASC
6 May 2011
CTF3+/CLIC 0
Manpower profile for integrated beam systems tests
CERN staff & fellows about constant, some increase in M to P
Ratio PCERN / PColl goes from 3 to 2