Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Evolution of the term “liberal”

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Evolution of the term “liberal”"— Presentation transcript:

1 Evolution of the term “liberal”
:

2 “Insist on a clear definition of terms”
incumbents candidates nominees delegates partisans independents electors plurality vs. majority single-member district

3 Why does the USA have only two viable parties?

4 SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS
PLURALITY SYSTEM

5 SINGLE MEMBER DISTRICTS
PLURALITY SYSTEM Winner Take All

6 Democratic/Republican Theory
Should the minority get NO representation?

7 Why are the various proportional election systems always multi-party?
Proportional Representation Why are the various proportional election systems always multi-party?

8 EXAMPLE of COMMON FORM Proportional Representation
Citizens vote for their Party in Parliament 10% % % 5% % % % % left-wing centrist right-wing parties parties parties

9 Proportional Representation
Citizens vote for their Party in Parliament 10% % % 5% % % % % left-wing centrist right-wing parties parties parties

10 X Party wins 10% of vote Proportional Representation X Party candidate
Mary Doe Joe Blow X Party wins 10% of vote X Party candidate list

11 200 seats in Parliament X Party wins 10% of vote
Proportional Representation X Party Mary Doe Joe Blow 200 seats in Parliament X Party wins 10% of vote

12 Party X wins 20 seats in Parliament
Proportional Representation X Party Mary Doe Joe Blow 200 seats in Parliament X Party wins 10% of vote Party X wins 20 seats in Parliament

13 Party X wins 20 seats in Parliament
Proportional Representation X Party Mary Doe Joe Blow Top 20 candidates win 200 seats in Parliament X Party wins 10% of vote Party X wins 20 seats in Parliament

14 Proportional Representation
10% % % 5% % % % % left-wing centrist right-wing parties parties parties Parties win seats in Parliament in proportion to the vote

15 10% 3% 35% 5% 15% 20% 5% 7% left center right
Proportional Representation Chooses Executive Branch Leaders 10% % % 5% % % % % left center right Leftist coalition government

16 10% 3% 35% 5% 15% 20% 5% 7% left center right
Proportional Representation Chooses Executive Branch Leaders 10% % % 5% % % % % left center right Centrist coalition government

17 10% 3% 35% 5% 15% 20% 5% 7% left center right
Proportional Representation Chooses Executive Branch Leaders 10% % % 5% % % % % left center right Right-Wing coalition government

18 minor parties in a Winner Take All system?
minor parties in a Proportional Election system?

19 The Modern American Party System (1932-present)

20 mainstream conservative Republicans progressive Republicans
Pre party alignment business oriented mainstream conservative Republicans progressive Republicans reformers, intellectuals Democrats predominantly Southern and agricultural: social conservatism, rural economic populism

21 1932 (Great Depression era)
mainstream conservative Republicans Northern Democrat FDR wins nomination progressive Republicans Democrats

22 mainstream conservative Republicans
1932 Presidential Election mainstream conservative Republicans Northern Democrat FDR wins nomination progressive Republicans Democrats Roosevelt declares himself a “liberal”

23 Remember: The British Liberal Party advocated economic reform and regulation of laissez-faire capitalism. “…controlling and directing economic forces in the interest of social justice and social stability.” J.M. Keynes

24 1932 Presidential Election
mainstream conservative Republicans progressive Republicans Democrats Roosevelt declares himself a “liberal”

25 1932 Presidential Election
mainstream conservative Republicans PARTY REALIGNMENT! progressive Republicans Democrats Roosevelt declares himself a “liberal”

26 “The Roosevelt Coalition”
mainstream conservative Republicans The “Solid south” Progressives Minorities Immigrants Working Class Democrats

27 mainstream conservative Republicans
Post-WWII era mainstream conservative Republicans The “Solid south” Progressives Minorities Immigrants Working Class liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats

28 mainstream conservative Republicans
1950s-1960s mainstream conservative Republicans liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats

29 liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats
1950s-1960s Pro- Civil Rights Anti- School Prayer Anti- VN War Pro- Choice Anti- Civil Rights Pro- School Prayer Pro- VN War Pro- Life liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats

30 mainstream conservative Republicans
1960s-1970s mainstream conservative Republicans On many issues: “the conservative coalition” liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats

31 mainstream conservative Republicans
1960s-190s mainstream conservative Republicans conservative coalition liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats presidential Republicanism

32 mainstream conservative Republicans
1980s-1990s mainstream conservative Republicans liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats

33 mainstream conservative Republicans
1980s-1990s mainstream conservative Republicans PARTY REALIGNMENT! liberal (New Deal) Democrats conservative (Old Guard) Democrats

34 Republicans Democrats
Republicans Democrats

35 mainstream Republicans
2008- mainstream Republicans Tea Party populists Democrats

36 Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Berners
2016 Election Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Berners

37 Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party?
2017-? Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party?

38 2017-? Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party? ?

39 Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party?
Party Realignment? Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party?

40 Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party?
Room for a Minor Party? Republicans Trumpsters Democrats Herbal Tea Party?

41 Republicans Trumpsters Libertarians Democrats Herbal Tea Party?
Room for a Minor Party? Republicans Trumpsters Libertarians Democrats Herbal Tea Party?

42 Republicans Trumpsters Libertarians Greens Democrats Herbal Tea Party?
Room for a Minor Party? Republicans Trumpsters Libertarians Greens Democrats Herbal Tea Party?

43 Republicans Trumpsters Other? Libertarians Greens Democrats
Room for a Minor Party? Republicans Trumpsters Other? Libertarians Greens Democrats Herbal Tea Party?

44 A new [centrist] party? median voter theory rise of independent voters, especially youth decline of parties rise of media “candidate-centered campaign”

45 A new [centrist] party? median voter theory but polarization rise of independent voters, especially youth but still winner-take-all (plurality) decline of parties but increased straight ticket voting rise of media “candidate-centered campaign” parties still run elections (party-centered)

46 Minor Parties single-issue (e.g. abortion, taxes)
ideological (Libertarian, Green, Socialist) splinter (Teddy Roosevelt BM progressives, George Wallace AIP) populist (Tea Party) ad hoc for an election (Ross Perot, Evan McMullin)

47 Minor Parties single-issue (e.g. abortion, taxes)
ideological (Libertarian, Green, Socialist) splinter (Teddy Roosevelt BM progressives, George Wallace AIP) populist (Tea Party) ad hoc for an election (Ross Perot, Evan McMullin) Irrelevant?

48 Minor Parties single-issue (e.g. abortion, taxes)
ideological (Libertarian, Green, Socialist) splinter (Teddy Roosevelt BM progressives, George Wallace AIP) populist (Tea Party) ad hoc for an election (Ross Perot, Evan McMullin) Irrelevant? -- force items on the agenda (Ross Perot 1992: budget deficit)

49 Minor Parties single-issue (e.g. abortion, taxes)
ideological (Libertarian, Green, Socialist) splinter (Teddy Roosevelt BM progressives, George Wallace AIP) populist (Tea Party) ad hoc for an election (Ross Perot, Evan McMullin) Irrelevant? -- force items on the agenda (Ross Perot 1992: budget deficit) -- push parties to shift positions (Socialists )

50 Minor Parties single-issue (e.g. abortion, taxes)
ideological (Libertarian, Green, Socialist) splinter (Teddy Roosevelt BM progressives, George Wallace AIP) populist (Tea Party) ad hoc for an election (Ross Perot, Evan McMullin) Irrelevant? -- force items on the agenda (Ross Perot 1992: budget deficit) -- push parties to shift positions (Socialists ) -- act as spoilers (Green Party--Ralph Nader 2000)

51 How do parties choose their nominees?

52 Caucus (in a political context): (as noun) a meeting (as verb) to meet
Caucus System Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D Caucus (in a political context): (as noun) a meeting (as verb) to meet D delegates

53 Functions of Party Conventions
Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D Choose party leaders Choose delegates Choose nominees Create a media event Make convention rules Write a platform Nominate electors

54 Criticism? Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention
State Convention National Convention D D D Choose party leaders Choose delegates Choose nominees Create a media event Make convention rules Write a platform Nominate electors

55 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D State-wide Primary Election

56 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D State-wide Primary Election non-binding

57 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D primary voters may caucus State-wide Primary Election Non-binding

58 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D N N primary voters may caucus binding N nominee State-wide Primary Election non-binding

59 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D N N primary voters may caucus binding party members State-wide Primary Election non-binding

60 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D N N primary voters may caucus binding party members State-wide Primary Election non-binding closed primary non-party members

61 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D N N primary voters may caucus binding party members State-wide Primary Election non-binding non-party members if open

62 State-wide Primary Election
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D N N primary voters may caucus binding party members State-wide Primary Election non-binding open or closed? non-party members

63 crossover voting: supportive vs. raiding
Reform Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D N N primary voters may caucus binding party members State-wide Primary Election non-binding open or closed? non-party members crossover voting: supportive vs. raiding

64 Presidential Primaries
Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D binding? State-wide Primary Election non-binding

65 Presidential Primaries
Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D binding? But How? (no nationwide primary) State-wide Primary Election non-binding

66 Presidential Primaries
Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D determines delegate selection to national convention: binding State-wide Primary Election non-binding

67 Presidential Primaries
Precinct Convention Local (county) Convention State Convention National Convention D D D determines delegate selection to national convention: (winner-take-all or proportional) binding State-wide Primary Election non-binding

68 Presidential Primaries
WTA delegates candidate statewide vote PROP 200 A= 45% 90 B= 35% 70 C= 20% 40 State Convention National Convention D determines delegate selection to national convention: (winner-take-all or proportional) binding TOTAL delegates from this state= 200 State-wide Primary Election

69 Presidential Primaries
Primary determined delegate selection to national convention AD State Convention National Convention BD CD binding (Delegates for A, B, C) State-wide Primary Election

70 Presidential Primaries
Primary determined delegate selection to national convention AD State Convention National Convention BD CD SD binding “superdelegates” chosen by Democratic Party rules (not Republicans) State-wide Primary Election

71 Presidential Primaries
Primary determined delegate selection to national convention AD State Convention National Convention nominate President BD CD SD binding “superdelegates” chosen by Democratic Party rules (not Republicans) State-wide Primary Election


Download ppt "Evolution of the term “liberal”"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google