Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Chapter 8 Infinite Series
2
Section 8.2 Convergence Tests
3
(Comparison Test) Theorem 8.2.1 Proof:
In this section we derive several tests that are useful in determining convergence. (Comparison Test) Let an and bn be infinite series of nonnegative terms. That is, an 0 and bn 0 for all n. Then If an converges and 0 bn an for all n, then bn converges. If an = + and 0 an bn for all n, then bn = + . Theorem 8.2.1 Proof: Since bn 0 for all n, the sequence (tn) of partial sums of bn is an increasing sequence. In part (a) this sequence is bounded above by the sum of the series an , so (tn) converges by the monotone convergence theorem (4.3.3). Thus bn converges. In part (b) the sequence (tn) must be unbounded, for otherwise an would have to converge. But then lim tn = + by Theorem 4.3.8, so that bn = + .
4
Example 8.2.2 Definition 8.2.4 Consider the series .
For all n we have In Example we saw that the series converges, so must also converge. Definition 8.2.4 If | an | converges, then the series an is said to converge absolutely (or to be absolutely convergent). If an converges but | an | diverges, then an is said to converge conditionally (or be conditionally convergent).
5
Theorem 8.2.5 If a series converges absolutely, then it converges. Proof: Suppose that an is absolutely convergent, so that | an | converges. By the Cauchy criterion for series (Theorem 8.1.6), given any > 0, there exists a natural number N such that n m N implies that | | am | + … + | an | | < . But then by the triangle inequality, so an also converges. When the terms of a series are nonnegative, convergence and absolute convergence are really the same thing. Thus the comparison test can be viewed as a test for absolute convergence. If we have a series bn with some negative terms, the corresponding series | bn | will have only nonnegative terms, and we can use the comparison test on it.
6
If it happens that 0 | bn | an for all n and if an converges, then we can conclude that | bn | converges. That is, bn converges absolutely. In fact, changing the first few terms in a series will affect the value of the sum of the series, but it will not change whether or not the series is convergent. So, given a nonnegative convergent series an and a second series bn, to conclude that | bn | is convergent it suffices to show that 0 | bn | an for all n greater than some N. By using the comparison test and the geometric series, we can derive two more useful tests for convergence.
7
(Ratio Test) Theorem 8.2.7 Proof:
Let an be a series of nonzero terms. If lim sup | an + 1/an | < 1, then the series converges absolutely. If lim inf | an + 1/an | > 1, then the series diverges. Otherwise, lim inf | an + 1/an | 1 lim sup | an + 1/an |, and the test gives no information about convergence or divergence. Theorem 8.2.7 Proof: (a) Let lim sup | an + 1/an | = L. If L < 1, then choose r so that L < r < 1. By Theorem (a) there exists N such that n N implies that | an + 1/an | r. (If there were infinitely many terms | an + 1/an | greater than r, then a subsequence would converge to something greater than or equal to r, a contradiction to r being greater than the lim sup | an + 1/an |.) That is, n N implies | an + 1 | r |an |. So, | aN + 1 | r |aN |, and | aN + 2 | r |aN + 1 | r2|aN |, etc. It follows easily by induction that | aN + k | rk |aN | for all k . Since 0 < r < 1, the geometric series rk is convergent. Thus | aN | rk is also convergent, and an is absolutely convergent by the comparison test.
8
Theorem 8.2.7 (Ratio Test) Proof:
Let an be a series of nonzero terms. If lim sup | an + 1/an | < 1, then the series converges absolutely. If lim inf | an + 1/an | > 1, then the series diverges. Otherwise, lim inf | an + 1/an | 1 lim sup | an + 1/an |, and the test gives no information about convergence or divergence. Proof: (b) If lim inf | an + 1/an | > 1, then it follows that | an + 1| > | an | for all n sufficiently large. Thus the sequence (an) cannot converge to zero, and by Theorem the series an must diverge. (c) This follows from the observation that the series 1/n2 converges and the harmonic series 1/n diverges. In both series we have lim | an + 1/an | = 1.
9
(Root Test) Theorem 8.2.8 Proof:
Given a series an, let = lim sup | an |1/n. If < 1, then the series converges absolutely. If > 1, then the series diverges. Otherwise, = 1, and the test gives no information about convergence or divergence. Theorem 8.2.8 Proof: (a) If < 1, choose r so that < r < 1. By Theorem (a) we have | an |1/n r for all n greater than some N. That is, | an | r n for all n > N. Since 0 < r < 1, the geometric series r n is convergent, so an is absolutely convergent by the comparison test. (b) If > 1, then | an |1/n 1 for infinitely many indices n. That is, | an | 1 for infinitely many terms. Thus the sequence (an) cannot converge to zero and, by Theorem 8.1.5, the series an must diverge.
10
Theorem 8.2.8 (Root Test) Proof:
Given a series an, let = lim sup | an |1/n. If < 1, then the series converges absolutely. If > 1, then the series diverges. Otherwise, = 1, and the test gives no information about convergence or divergence. Proof: (c) follows from considering the convergent series 1/n2 and the divergent series 1/n. In Example we showed that lim n1/n = 1. Thus, Similarly, lim |1/n|1/n = 1, so the root test yields = 1 for both series. Thus when = 1 we can draw no conclusion about the convergence or divergence of a given series. Note: This is very useful in applying the root test to other sequences.
11
(Integral Test) Theorem 8.2.13 Proof:
Let f be a continuous function defined on [0, ), and suppose that f is positive and decreasing. That is, if x1 < x2, then f (x1) f (x2) > 0. Then the series f (n) converges iff exists as a real number. Theorem Proof: Let an = f (n) and bn = Since f is decreasing, given any n we have f (n + 1) f (x) f (n) for all x [n, n + 1]. Since the length of each subinterval is 1, it follows that Geometrically, this means that the area under the curve y = f (x) from x = n to x = n + 1 is between f (n + 1) and f (n). Thus 0 < an +1 bn an for each n. By the comparison test applied twice, an converges iff bn converges. y = f (x) But the partial sums of bn are the integrals , so bn converges precisely when exists as a real number. Area is f (n + 1) Area is f (n) n n + 1
12
So, the p-series 1/n p converges if p > 1 and diverges if p 1.
Any series of the form 1/n p , where p , is called a p-series. Example It is easy to see that the ratio and root tests both fail to determine convergence. But, we can use the integral test. For p 1, we have The limit of this as n will be finite if p > 1 and infinite if p < 1. Thus by the integral test 1/n p converges if p > 1 and diverges if p < 1. When p = 1, we get the harmonic series, which is divergent. So, the p-series 1/n p converges if p > 1 and diverges if p 1. This can be useful when applying the comparison test.
13
(Alternating Series Test)
If the terms in a series alternate between positive and negative values, the series is called an alternating series. Our final test gives us a simple criterion for determining the convergence of an alternating series. Theorem (Alternating Series Test) If (an) is a decreasing sequence of positive numbers and lim an = 0, then the series (1)n +1an converges. Proof: The idea of the proof is to show that the sequence (sn) of partial sums converges by considering two subsequences: the subsequence (s2n) coming from the sum of an even number of terms, and the subsequence (s2n+1) coming from the sum of an odd number of terms. In the text there are several examples of applying the various convergence tests to specific series.
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.