Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Observing system depiction of circulation in the SE US coastal ocean

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Observing system depiction of circulation in the SE US coastal ocean"— Presentation transcript:

1 Observing system depiction of circulation in the SE US coastal ocean
H. Seim, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill L Leonard, University of North Carolina at Wilmington M. Fletcher, University of South Carolina D. Savidge, Skidaway Institute of Oceanography C. Edwards, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill

2 Why a circulation climatology?
In general: Simple characterization of existing data Important source of validation for models Motivate archival scheme For the SE United States coastline: Confirm existing depictions and develop digital form Examine adequacy of observing system design Study the dynamics of the flow field

3 A specific interest – design of Marine Protected Areas – are they connected?
Hare et al., 2007

4 No mean flow presentation
Depiction of Seasonal Cycle by Lee, Yoder and Atkinson (1991), Based on big DOE-funded deployments in ‘70s and ‘80s Only variability Winter/Spring Summer Fall Distinguishes 3 shelf regimes, inner (<20 m), middle (20-40 m) and outer (>40m), And the Gulf Stream. Cartoon depicts Gulf Stream, outer and mid shelf. No mean flow presentation

5 Blanton et al. 2004 – digital model climatology, forced by mass field and
climatological winds (COADS) – inner shelf regime hard to distinguish, no Onslow Bay

6 Observing System measurement locations (for SABSOON, Caro-COOPs,
CORMP, NCCOOS and NDBC) 19 stations occupied between , inner and mid-shelf Area under study In this talk

7 What’s new? Bight-wide coverage over 5+ years
Better vertical resolution of currents Inclusion of nearshore (10m or less) Not so good: No observations seaward of 40m isobath Widely disparate moorings and data management systems

8 Coverage over time in the ‘climatology’ for ADCPs– only months with
50% or greater coverage are included

9 Depth-averaged mean currents and average winds
Cape Fear 0.005 N/m2 Depth-averaged mean currents and average winds Weak mean flow (5 cm/s or less) inshore of 30 m isobath, divergent GS-influenced poleward flow seaward of 40 m isobath Near-zero flow S off SC Topographic steering – flow largely along isobaths Mean winds are weak and variable 50m 15m

10 MAB depth-averaged mean current – equatorward and relatively uniform
Lentz, JGR, 2008

11 Seasonal depiction – consider:
winds Limited temperature/salinity time series Depth-averaged currents Depth-varying currents

12 0.03 N/m2 Wintertime Fairly uniform SE wind stress Dominated by cold-air outbreaks

13 Wintertime Depth-averaged flow Similar to mean
20 cm/s Depth-averaged flow Similar to mean Reasonable comparison to model

14 Feb bottom temp Feb surf temp Blanton climatology Temp (deg C)

15 Depth-resolved flow - February Depth (m)
Generally little vertical structure Exception at nearshore stations

16 Summer Bermuda-high dominated Northward wind stress

17 Summer SC Depth-averaged flow Whole shelf in motion to NE
Minimum flow off SC – signature of gyre? Model underestimates inner shelf flow

18 Jul bottom temp Jul surf temp Blanton climatology Temp (deg C)

19 Depth-resolved flow - July SC Depth (m) Significant veering
20 cm/s SC Depth-resolved flow - July Depth (m) Significant veering Consistent with upwelling Should promote nutrient delivery from GS Exception at shallow stations off SC

20 Fall Strong southward wind stress Strength increases seaward

21 Fall SC Depth-averaged flow GA Reduced flow at 40 m isobath
Southward flow on middle, inner shelf Minima off SC again Schematic captures flow well Model misrepresents inner, middle shelf

22

23 Depth-resolved flow - December Depth (m)
20 cm/s Depth-resolved flow - December Depth (m) Confused flow, strongly divergent Veering mostly in opposite sense Offshore bottom flow – convection?

24 Blaha, JGR ’84 found coherent monthly averaged sea level variations over SAB (’55-’75 period, heating and atmos. press effects removed). Can be more than 20 cm variation annually. Postulated due to Gulf Stream transport variations.

25 Noble/Gelfenbaum – modeled coastal SL impact of GS transport variations.
Low transport Gulf Stream Average transport Coast Offshore Fixed “Hinge” Low transport, higher CSL Shelf Gulf Stream Average transport Coast High transport Offshore Fixed “Hinge” High transport, lower CSL Shelf

26 Role of Charleston Bump?
Does turn of GS at the Bump change the surface elevation on the shelf? Could explain the slowdown/reversal in alongshelf flow off SC

27 Summary Assembled ADCP observations largely confirm qualitative depiction of Lee et al (1991) – reduced flow off SC consistent with gyre influence but gyre not represented in observations. Digital climatology of Blanton et al (2004) fails to represent inner shelf and equatorward mid-shelf flows Strong upwelling circulation in summer is evident Downwelling circulation present in fall/winter/spring but not shelf-wide Plan to continue assembly of currents and winds, temperature and salinity measurements

28 MONTHLY MEAN ALONG- AND CROSS-SHORE CURRENT
Climatological along-shore monthly mean wind (scaled 1cm/s:1m/s) At Station Off GA Depth (m above bottom) Depth (m above bottom) SSW ALONG NNE On-shore CROSS Off-shore

29

30

31

32 Baringer/Larsen

33 40 cm/s Jan

34 40 cm/s Feb

35 40 cm/s Mar

36 40 cm/s Apr

37 40 cm/s May

38 40 cm/s Jun

39 40 cm/s Jul

40 40 cm/s Aug

41 40 cm/s Sep

42 40 cm/s Oct

43 40 cm/s Nov

44 40 cm/s Dec


Download ppt "Observing system depiction of circulation in the SE US coastal ocean"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google