1. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
FIRST DRAFT OF A PROPOSAL TO IANPHI

2. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Mandate: UN Global Health Crises Task Force, final report
Request for Proposals: Joint Rfp from Bill
and Melinda Gates Foundation and Wellcome Trust
to be issued soon

3. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Initial grant from Skoll Global Threats Fund to Chatham House (following proposal in March 2016)
Global scoping meeting (March 2017) of stakeholders in external monitoring and accountability of preparedness for to identify gaps (Chatham House and Graduate Institute), Geneva
Academic institutions (including Harvard, Johns Hopkins, LSHTM)
Regional and global international organisations/development banks (including World Bank, UN office of Disaster Risk Reduction (Sendai Framework), WHO, UN High Commission on Human Rights)
Foundations (including Skoll Global Threats Fund, Rockefeller Foundation, Wellcome Trust)
National Public Health Institutes (including CDC, PHE, Robert Koch)
NGOs (including GHSA, JEE Alliance, WEF)
Geneva-based diplomatic mission health attaches representing countries (including Norway, USA, UAE, UK, Haiti, Germany, Sierra Leone, Japan, Thailand, Indonesia, Portugal, India)
The Lancet (senior editor)

4. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Gaps identified (no external monitoring and/or accountability mechanisms)
One health platforms
Travel and trade restrictions during outbreaks
Sharing of data and specimens during outbreaks
Research and development for preparedness

5. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Activities in preparation for global monitoring and accountability since March
One health platforms
Preparation of background paper reviewing existing indicators from various sources including OIE, WHO and FAO
Organisation of roundtable in November to review background paper and come to final set of preliminary indicators
Travel restrictions during outbreaks
Meeting with WEF in May to review case studies of airlines and discussion of reasons some did not fly to Ebola outbreak countries, why others did fly
Preparation of background paper with consdierations as to what needs to be monitored as preparedness so that travek can continue

6. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Activities in preparation for global monitoring and accountability since March (……..continued)
Sharing of data and specimens during outbreaks
Participation in WHO blueprint activities at Wellcome Trust, WHO and Chatham House
Trade restrictions during outbreaks
Background paper on the issues involved being developed
Research and Development for preparedness
No activities – discussions with WHO planned in mid-November
Indicators for other capacities for preparedness
To be determined early in the life of the next project if grant proposal successful

7. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Proposed governance
Broad partnership with academic institutions, national public health institutes, NGOs with informal governance
Advisory board of global public health experts
Physical IANPHI secretariat in one institute, with virtual focal points/partners from other national public health institutes
IANPHI external monitoring and accountability of willing countries through technical cooperation among countries
The Lancet for regular publication of peer reviewed updates

8. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Proposed role of partners based on comparative advantage
Academia
Participate in indicator identification/development
Develop background papers/assess quality of data/prepare reports
Monitor at global and regional levels/collect indicator information
National Public Health Institutes
Provide external monitoring at country level
Provide data to secretariat
IANPHI (as secretariat)
Loosely coordinate all partners
Prepare annual report from data collected from Academia and National Public Health Institutes

9. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Points for discussion
Does IANPHI feel that this is an appropriate activity – does it fit with its mandate?
Is IANPHI able to take on a secretariat role?
If so what staffing requirements would be required and where would it be based
Which public health institutes would be willing to participate either in the secretaeriat, as representatives of IANPHI at roundtables and other meetings, and in external monitoring activities?
What would be the “dream team” for the advisory group?

10. Monitoring and Accountability for Preparedness (MAP)
Potential partners (expressed interest to Chatham House)
Graduate Institute Geneva (Centre on Global Health)
IANPHI
London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine
Sendai Framework
SciDev
The Lancet
JEE Alliance
World Economic Forum
Others to be sought from Africa, Asia and Latin America
Chatham House