Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

E.A. Preble, Z. Reitmeier, S. Einfeldt, R.F. Davis

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "E.A. Preble, Z. Reitmeier, S. Einfeldt, R.F. Davis"— Presentation transcript:

1 SiC influence on x-ray measurements of GaN films compared with photoluminescence and electrical data
E.A. Preble, Z. Reitmeier, S. Einfeldt, R.F. Davis North Carolina State University D.S. Katzer, H Dietrich Naval Research Labs Ulrich Schwartz Universität Regensburg February 12, 2002

2 Topics of discussion Background
SiC wafer variability SiC influence on GaN x-ray data Wafer mapping as a solution to SiC influence Extraction of reliable and repeatable x-ray data Do x-ray map results correlate to PL and electrical results?

3 Typical SiC Wafers SiC FWHM

4 SiC XRD correlation with GaN XRD

5 SiC/GaN FWHM Relationship
GaN FWHM not influenced by SiC

6 GaN Thickness Data

7 AlN Buffer Layer Changes

8 AlN vs AlGaN Buffer Layers

9 PL maps vs. X-ray maps

10 Electrical results – Mobility vs Resistivity

11 Electrical results – Mobility vs Bulk Carrier Concentration

12 Electrical results – Mobility

13 Electrical results – Resistivity

14 Electrical results – Carrier Concentration

15 Why isn’t there a correlation?
XRD vs PL X-ray measurements are bulk measurements PL measurements are more localized Correlations are not found because of scale difference XRD vs Electrical Data Both measurements are large area Electrical results are not sensitive to domain tilting that is observed via XRD This x-ray technique is not useful in prediction of electrical results


Download ppt "E.A. Preble, Z. Reitmeier, S. Einfeldt, R.F. Davis"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google