Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.

Published byIlene Foster Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data."— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data.
From: Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Public Opin Q. 2012;76(3): doi: /poq/nfs036 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Figure 2. Single-Tree Fit.
From: Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Public Opin Q. 2012;76(3): doi: /poq/nfs036 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

3 Figure 3. Misclassification Error Rates.
From: Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Public Opin Q. 2012;76(3): doi: /poq/nfs036 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

4 Figure 4. CATE Estimates. From: Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Public Opin Q. 2012;76(3): doi: /poq/nfs036 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

5 Figure 5. Histogram of CATE Estimates.
From: Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Public Opin Q. 2012;76(3): doi: /poq/nfs036 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

6 Figure 6. Kernel Density Plots of CATE Estimates.
From: Modeling Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in Survey Experiments with Bayesian Additive Regression Trees Public Opin Q. 2012;76(3): doi: /poq/nfs036 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1. Single-Tree Model and BART Fits to Simulated Data."

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.

Fig. 3. Plot of overall survival by adjuvant therapy for patient subgroups. (A) Patients with M0 disease (n = 411). (B) Patients receiving 36 Gy craniospinal.
Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency

Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.

Figure 1. Flow diagram of participants recruited into the study.
Fig. 1 Graphical representation

Fig. 1 Graphical representation
Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.

Figure 1. Scree plot for the exploratory factor analysis (EFA) of the Death Depression Scale (DDS). From: Development and psychometric evaluation of a.
Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.

Figure 2. CONSORT flow diagram.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.

Source:Rosnes and Vennemo 2009.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.
Note: Vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals

Note: Vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.

Figure 3. Average response time by signal-to-noise ratio (SNR), group, and condition. Error bars represent standard error. Response time was measured as.
Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)

Figure 1. Mean recalled time (days) since the start of the last quit attempt by use of stop-smoking medications (SSM) and Heaviness of Smoking Index (HSI)
Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).

Error bars represent the mean (s.e.).

Similar presentations

Ads by Google