1. NE Rural Ordinance Survey Results

2. What is appropriate setback for residential developments on Scenic Roadway Corridors? 100 feet, 75 feet,50 feet, Other

3. Do you believe that the proposed protection of existing topography language is consistent with the Comprehensive Plan Policy? Do you recommend any additional changes?

4. Topography Language Sample Comments Preserve the hills
Language is too restrictive

5. 5 foot shoulder for cyclists on the rural street cross-section standards (consistent with FDOT minimum standard for bike lane.) Would you support this recommendation?

6. Street Standards 5 foot Shoulders Language
Sample Comments
Encourage safe cycling
Would like to make sure taxes don’t go up to pay for it
Promotes the rural environment to stay rural
Let County build them

7. Do you want to include Rural Building Character for residential development? Do you want to list examples of rural consistent design elements?

8. Do you agree with the proposed 4 feet height in front setback for fences and walls?

9. Rural Building Character Language
Sample Comments
Agree with rural character, but disagree with specific guidelines
Appropriate for 3+ homes
No on residential, Yes on business
Not important

10. Do you want to limit material type used on fences and walls?
Sample Comments
No Chain-link
No Solid Walls
No limit on material
No Barbwire

11. Do you agree with the intent to include dark sky lighting standards?

12. Do you agree with the intent to include dark sky lighting standards?
Sample Comments
Sky at nigh most beautiful part of living in NE Pasco
If all residential why is it needed?
Minimum light pollution
Full cut off lighting