1. EUROnu: Management Aspects
Structure
IAP
Internal and external collaboration
Reporting
Administration and finance
Next steps
Conclusions

2. Management Structure Structure from original proposal.
All exists and works as proposed, with small changes.
Interaction with other projects via different routes
At least 4 2

3. Management Structure Management Board Coordination Board Coordinator
Safety; SB
Cost; BB
Perform.; NF
Edgecock
STFC
Dracos
CNRS
Efthymiopoulos
CERN
Long
Imperial
Coordination Board
Work package
Activity
Coordinator
Deputy
WP1
Management, etc
Edgecock (STFC)
WP2
Superbeam
Zito (CEA)
Densham (STFC)
WP3
Neutrino Factory
Pozimski (IC)
Martini (CERN)
WP4
Beta beams
Wildner (CERN)
Hansen (CERN)
WP5
Detectors
Soler (Glasgow)
Cervera (CSIC)
WP6
Physics
Hernandez (CSIC)
Donini (CSIC)

4. International Advisory Panel (IAP)
Ewart Blackmore (TRIUMF, Canada)
Swapan Chattopadhyay (CI, UK)
Steve Holmes (FNAL, USA)
Hitoshi Murayama (Tokyo, Japan)
Mike Zisman (LBL, USA) – chair
Have attended all three Annual Meetings: - verbal report to Governing Board - written report, to which we respond
Very helpful to have external view on progress
Helps to maintain contact with international activities

5. International Advisory Panel (IAP)
All three reports on EUROnu website
Contain recommendations and comments
No big problems identified
No major changes of direction recommended
Main recent concerns: target work in WP2 and WP baseline Beta Beam facility - resources for costing exercise

6. Internal Collaboration
Three annual meetings so far: March 2009 in CERN June 2010 in Strasbourg January 2011 in RAL
Next meeting(s): May 2012 in Paris th meeting to finish off/plan next step??
Good attendance: e.g. 68 at RAL meeting
Agendas and talks kept in CERN Indico
GB and IAP meet during these

7. Internal Collaboration Examples of types of meeting
Internal meetings recorded on website
WP meetings often take place in General meetings
Work package
Examples of types of meeting
Number
General
Annual, meetings >2 WPs 14
WP1
CB, etc
WP2
WP meeting
WP3 9
WP4
WP5 3
WP6 8
Total 76

8. Internal Collaboration
Communication also by all usual methods
Interaction particularly important between WP6 and others WP5 and others costing, safety and others

9. External Collaboration
Country
Associate
Canada
TRIUMF
France
GANIL
Germany
Aachen
GSI
India
INO
Israel
Weizmann
Portugal
Lisbon
Russia
IAP, Novgorad
JINR, Dubna
Switzerland
Geneva UK
Brunel
USA
Argonne
Brookhaven
FNAL
Virginia Tech
Muon Collaboration
Mentioned many times already
Very important for EUROnu!
Happens via Associates (all WP)

10. External Collaboration
Country
Associate
Canada
TRIUMF
France
GANIL
Germany
Aachen
GSI
India
INO
Israel
Weizmann
Portugal
Lisbon
Russia
IAP, Novgorad
JINR, Dubna
Switzerland
Geneva UK
Brunel
USA
Argonne
Brookhaven
FNAL
Virginia Tech
Muon Collaboration
Mentioned many times already
Very important for EUROnu!
Happens via Associates (all WP) IDS (WP3, 5, 6)

11. External Collaboration
Steering committee
A.Blondel
Geneva
M.Zisman
LBNL
Y.Kuno
Osaka
K.Long (chair)
Imperial
Accelerator conveners
S.Berg
BNL
J.Pozimski
Y.Mori
Kyoto
C.Prior
STFC
Detector conveners
A.Bross
FNAL
P.Soler
Glasgow
N.Mondal
Mumbai
A.Cervera
Valencia
Physics performance
S.Choubey
Harish
A.Gouvea
Northwestern
A.Donini
Madrid
P.Huber (chair)
Virginia Tech
J.Kopp
MPI
S.Parke
FNAL
S.Pascoli
Durham
W.Winter (co-chair)
Wuerzburg
O.Yasuda
Tokyo

12. External Collaboration
Steering committee
A.Blondel
Geneva
M.Zisman
LBNL
Y.Kuno
Osaka
K.Long (chair)
Imperial
Accelerator conveners
S.Berg
BNL
J.Pozimski
Y.Mori
Kyoto
C.Prior
STFC
Detector conveners
A.Bross
FNAL
P.Soler
Glasgow
N.Mondal
Mumbai
A.Cervera
Valencia
Physics performance
S.Choubey
Harish
A.Gouvea
Northwestern
A.Donini
Madrid
P.Huber (chair)
Virginia Tech
J.Kopp
MPI
S.Parke
FNAL
S.Pascoli
Durham
W.Winter (co-chair)
Wuerzburg
O.Yasuda
Tokyo

13. External Collaboration
Mentioned many times already
Very important for EUROnu!
Happens via Associates (all WP) IDS (WP3, 5, 6) Contact with other FP7 neutrino projects NEU2012 (in EuCARD) LAGUNA-LBNO Collaboration of EUROnu members with projects - Collaboration on related accelerator projects
Plus dissemination activities described by Christian
In particular, reporting to CERN Council via Strategy Group, SPC, etc - ECFA via ECFA panel

14. Administration
Annual reports: st was somewhat delayed as new experience - 2nd was much better (SESAM is awful!)
Payment of EC contribution: prepayment was distributed promptly st annual was delayed, because of late report and a new STFC financial system nd annual payment is almost ready and will be distributed promptly
Changes to the Consortium: CSIC 3rd party (UAM) has never taken part in EUROnu it could be removed from GA (if required)

15. Total staff months from GA
Financial Report
Total staff months from GA
Workpackage
WP1
WP2
WP3
WP4
WP5
WP6
TOTAL per Beneficiary
STFC
13/68
74/137
94/78
181/283
CEA
28/46
3/34
31/80
CERN
4/12
25/74
55/80
0/1
84/167
Glasgow
6/57
Imperial
46/84
CSIC
10/47
11/60
21/107
CNRS
38/102
0/12
49/78
16/44
107/248
CUT
8/48
UDUR
13/32
INFN
10/18
28/56
38/74
MPG
4/57
UOXF.DL
0/6
UniSofia
48/51
Warwick
26/28
UCL
22/85
TOTAL
21/92
148/333
191/282
139/295
80/199
56/206
635/1407

16. Financial Report
Staff months
SM so far/ SM total
Partner
Total

17. Financial Report
Staff months
SM so far/ SM total
Work Package
Total

18. Financial Report Total Costs (€) Partner Year 1 Year 2 Total to date
Total GA
Ratio
STFC
0.480
CEA
0.313
CERN
0.644
Glasgow
0.184
Imperial
0.354
CSIC
0.279
CNRS
0.469
CUT
0.167
UDUR
0.240
INFN
0.752
MPG
0.139
UOXF.DL
765.66
0.00
0.098
UniSofia
0.491
Warwick
0.583
UCL
0.186
TOTAL
0.438

19. Total so far/ Total for EUROnu
Financial Report
Total Costs (€)
Total so far/ Total for EUROnu
Partner

20. Financial Report EC Contribution (€) Partner Pre-finance Year 1
Year 2 Request
Total GA
Left
STFC
CEA
CERN
Glasgow
Imperial
CSIC
CNRS
CUT
UDUR
INFN
MPG
UOXF.DL
574.25
0.00
UniSofia
Warwick
UCL
TOTAL

21. Fraction of EC contribution left
Financial Report
EC Contribution (€)
Fraction of EC contribution left
Partner
Total

22. Conclusions EUROnu is progressing well! No major delays
All objectives, milestones and deliverables will be met
All partners will meet their obligations
As always, some difficulties to be dealt with: - resources for costing
We have all learnt a lot since the start of EUROnu
Remainder will run even more smoothly