1. WSU Computing Needs
Survey Results

2. Participant Characteristics
223 respondents

3. Participant Characteristics

4. Did Your Department Provide you With a laptop?
13 respondents indicated they did not receive a computer.
All were adjuncts.
8 from EAST
2 from A&H
1 from science
2 from SBS
All purchased their own – average amount spent = $1413
Could they pick if they received a laptop or desktop?
Yes = 57% No = 30% 12% could not recall

5. Use of personal Computer
53% of ALL respondents indicated they use their own self- purchased laptop/desktop computer for job-related work.
Of those respondents that indicated they do use their own computer, they indicated they use it for 45.4% of their job- related work. *This did not vary significantly between colleges.

6. Does a Laptop/Desktop Meet your Technological needs?

7. Has Your Technology Been Subsidized?

8. Standard Technology in Lecture Classrooms
Respondents were asked: “How important is it to YOU that all of the lecture (lab/performance-based) classrooms in your DEPARTMENT (COLLEGE/BUILDING) (UNIVERSITY) all have the same technological capabilities built into them?” 1 = Not at all Important 2 = Slightly Important 3 = Moderately Important 4 = Very Important 5 = Extremely Important

9. Results: Lecture-Based Classrooms

10. Results: Lab/Performance-Based Classrooms

11. Results – Comparing Lecture & Lab-Based Classes
Overall, respondents found it significantly more important for standardization within departments and buildings, less so at the university level, and this trend was even stronger for lab-based classrooms

12. Adaptable Technology Classroom Interfaces
Respondents were asked: “How important is it to YOU that all of the lecture (lab/performance-based) classrooms in your DEPARTMENT (COLLEGE/BUILDING) (UNIVERSITY) are capable of accepting/operating technology you want to bring in?” 1 = Not at all Important 2 = Slightly Important 3 = Moderately Important 4 = Very Important 5 = Extremely Important

13. Results: Lecture-Based Classrooms

14. Results: Lab/Performance-Based Classrooms

15. Results – Comparing Lecture & Lab-Based Classes
Overall, respondents found it significantly more important that classrooms within departments and buildings are capable of accepting their technology, less so at the university level, and this trend was even stronger for lab-based classrooms

16. Selected Comments
- My computer (purchased by my college) is 5+ years old. My laptop (purchased by me) is 5 years old. Faculty need to be kept up to date with
newer computers and technology, and we shouldn't have to buy it on our own!
- We need stronger Wi Fi connections.
- Life span of computers provided is shorter than the renewal period usually.
- Just like an airplane, interchangeability is a good thing.
- We need lab computers that boot quickly and start programs quickly.
- It is not just enough to have the technology there, but it also needs to work ALL the time. It is so frustrating to walk into a classroom
and not have your technology work that day.
- Reliability of the technology needs to be improved.
- I care more that the equipment works rather than if they are all the same.
- More and more it seems like we are being asked to teach classes in other buildings. It is important, then to have high quality
technology that is consistent across classrooms and buildings.
- The teacher stations in the classrooms in the education building are severely outdated and in desperate need of upgrades. It is
challenging to teach and work in such outdated classrooms.
- The crux of this survey seems to be how important it is to have very similar or identical technology in all classrooms. For me, that is
somewhat desirable, but it is not essential. It would be nice if all classrooms had both, but it is not essential. I want to provide input for
an issue not addressed in the survey. That is how important is it that the technology in the classrooms actually works. For me, this is
critically important, and WSU is not meeting this need. Does the technology need to be consistent? No. Does the technology need to
work. Yes.
- Our classroom computers are very slow to boot up at the beginning of class.
- Classrooms within the same building should have the same technology available so those teaching in the building know what to
expect. However, the technology needs for a given building should be jointly decided by those who use it and do not have to be
uniform across the university.
- Providing adequate technology in the classroom should be among the university's highest priorities. In the past I feel that it has not been, as
faculty have sometimes had to beg to get upgrades. Computing support on campus continues to lag that of other universities that I am familiar
with.
- If this survey is about standardizing computers and technology on campus I don't think that is the best move.
- The current classrooms meet my needs well. The university has added smart boards to a small number of classrooms. I'm very happy that they
have NOT been added to all classrooms. When I have worked with them in the past, I found them to be glitchy and problematic. Since only a few
of us need or want them, it makes sense not to put this technology in every room, but rather to reserve them for those who request them.