Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

IMPACT Facility Administrators Session

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "IMPACT Facility Administrators Session"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 IMPACT Facility Administrators Session

3 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Agenda Main developments in 2016 and main Priorities for 2017 My Facility Configuration Open Discussion 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

4 Facility Administrators
Facility Administrator role was discussed and approved in the Intervention Management Working Group (IMWG) of April 2015 Split responsibilities of configuring a Facility and coordinating the activities Facility Administrators are the only people with rights to modify the configuration for a Facility (locations, systems, roles, masks, intervention periods…) Maximun 2 Facility Administrators per Facility 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

5 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
2016 Development Professional Visits procedure (EDMS: ) Harmonize the declaration and organization of Professional Visits at CERN Integration with PRT (CERN’s Pre-Registration Tool) Reduce ping-pong communications between visit organizers and Registration Service 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

6 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
2016 Development Integration with ADaMS 3 Anticipate 24 hours prior the access starts the propagation of data Reduce the stress in ADaMS and speeds up the access propagation 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

7 674 DIMRs created since 11th November 2016
2016 Development DIMR v2 procedure (EDMS: ) DIMR V1 was based on the 2006 ALARA rules DIMR V2 is based on the new ALARA rules (EDMS: ) Goal: EYETS 674 DIMRs created since 11th November 2016 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

8 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
2016 Development Blocking participants/activities when estimate doses are overcome Information coming from the Operational Dosimetry system Blocking activities: When an activity estimated collective dose is overcome then this activity will be Interrupted and a message will be displayed to users. Blocking participants: When the participant for an activity overcome the estimated individual dose IMPACT will set a flag in the data that is shared with ADaMS to block the access to this user. This information is displayed in IMPACT. Under discussion with ADaMS 3 to show the information in the ADaMS kiosk 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

9 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
2016 Development New activity form UI Modernize the complex activity form existing in IMPACT Improve user experience with a cleaner interface Effort to be continued in 2017 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

10 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
2016 Development 12 IMPACT releases along 2016 Total of 787 tasks implemented Charts + Some numbers 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

11 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
2016 Development 133 Professional Visits 944 Guided Visits 131 Radiography 224 Electrical Lockouts 23 Cryogenic Lockouts 20 Clusters Charts + Some numbers 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

12 Main 2017 Development Objectives
IS37 (EDMS Estimated for April) CERN's Disable/Enable Alarm level 3 - safety procedure implemented in EDH in the year 2000 following the Safety Instruction 37 Along these years using the IS37 procedure, users have identified improvements that shall be implemented to make this form more in line with the actual working procedures, and correct some of the small weaknesses that presents Work Dose Planning (EDMS ) From Excel to the Web Better integration with DIMR v2 EDMS documents 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

13 Main 2017 Developments Objective
Dashboard and Reporting Extensive work on analysing all potential use cases: List of my activities/safety documents to approve by me Do I have access to intervene for the activities where I’m participant? Maintenance New Facilities  North Area Beam Lines, Neutrino Platform, AD Experiments Others  Tir Radio v2, DIMR v2.1, Fire Permit v1.1, Piquet activities, RP Approval review… Users Requests Your feedback / input will be welcome! Your input is welcome! 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

14 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
How can I stay tuned? IMPACT Home Help Page Intervention Management Working Group meetings: New organisation Calendar for 2017 9th March 18th May 14th September 16th November Trainings SIR Courses  IMPACT fundamentals and Fire Permit Classroom course  Advanced session Professional Visits  Ongoing What is new? IMPACT Release notes 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

15 My Facility Configuration
Mask definition Locations Systems Intervention Periods Roles 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

16 Mask Definition and Usage
A bit of history of the Activity Mask: Back in 2011 different needs where expressed by coordination teams for custom “activities” per facility LHC Operators requested a custom configuration for activities declared in the LHC Machine during an Intervention Period of type operation Guided Visits, Professional Visits and Radiography Visits are type of activities that requires custom data 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

17 Mask Definition and Usage
How a mask is selected: 3 properties determine the mask to be selected: Facility Intervention Period Activity Type - + Precedence 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

18 Mask Definition and Usage
After 5 years of usage, can we unify (as much as possible) the Facility masks? Maybe unification is difficult but simplification can be a first target Simplifying the mask will help: Users declaring activities Approvers to focus in what is important Improve quality of the data Harmonization of the usage of IMPACT along facilities Field Visibility Report to analyse the usage of the masks ATLAS mask review in 2015 / 2016 (EDMS: ) by Michel Raymond 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

19 How locations are used in IMPACT and the link with AIS locations
Timeline: 2014: First analysis to better understand Facility needs 2015: Interviews with Facility Administrators to build the Facility Tree November 2015: New locations repository in IMPACT Some constraints to keep in mind A location can’t be part of 2 facilities In an activity we can’t have locations outside the activity facility Locations without Radiation Classification Area will be hidden (RP is pro-actively classifying all new locations) If the activity has an impact in other facilities then the requestor can use the field Impacted Facility  Facility Coordination team of the impacted facility will need to approve the activity 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

20 How locations are used in IMPACT and the link with AIS locations
Lifecycle of buildings New buildings  Automatically added to the “Surface and other facilities" Facility Floors and rooms  If the parent (floor :: building, room :: floor) belongs entirely to the facility, then locations will be automatically added to the parent. Otherwise we will need to contact group owners to better understand where these locations should be added Others Initial discussion with ADaMS 3 to manage Access Points to access a given location in the Location repository (today is IMPACT who keeps this data and is not shared with other systems) Raisin injects custom location properties to the repository, this data is then propagated to IMPACT IMPACT Locations report 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

21 Locations Application
FAP-AIS-GI Jan Janke Daniel Garcia Baldomir Matteo Mara 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

22 After Location presentation
If I want to change the structure or properties of my location: Create a Service Now ticket We will analyse your request, identified the feasibility of the change and depending the complexity we might ask you to do the change directly in the Location repository guiding you on the process or we will do it on your behalf 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

23 Location – ATLAS Example
Facility Grouping Building Floor Local Equip Souterrain 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

24 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Systems A bit of history: By default, most of the facilities use the systems defined for LHC Machine. Some facilities as Alice, ATLAS, CMS, LHCb, Computing Facilities or GIF personalized their system tree. In the past it was possible for Facility Administrators to edit their own system tree (functionality only used by 1 Facility so it was decommissioned 3 years ago) Weakness No link between Facility and System, you can have an activity for ALICE where the system belongs to SPS. 8260 activities with conflicts 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

25 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Systems Effort to review and improve systems (IMWG) Is it accurate the list of systems declared? Is IMPACT the best tool to define systems for a facility? How to avoid conflicts between systems and facilities? Roles System Approver  Approves the activity where the system is declared System Responsible  Has same privileges as the activity responsible 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

26 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Intervention Periods You are the responsible of maintaining the intervention periods for your facility: IMPACT Intervention Periods screen Operations: Create Edit Delete: Only if no activities are already using it Type of Intervention Periods Technical Stop, Extended Technical Stop, Shutdown, Operation, Any time Any time  To be reviewed to analyse if we can remove it Operation  on-going discussion on piquet activities for TI operators 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

27 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Roles You are the responsible of maintaining the roles in your facility: IMPACT Role Assignment screen Operations: Create, Edit & Delete: Only for Roles where the target facility is your facility IMPACT help page will guide you on the process (only avaiable within CERN network) It’s possible to assign a role to an e-group Warning! Many-many-…-many people can suddenly inherit a role if the e- group is misused 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

28 Roles that you can manage
Usage in Targets Facility Coordinator Activity workflow Activity Change Request Workflow Your facility * Intervention Period Facility RP Activity Workflow DIMR document and workflow System Approval System or Org Unit System Responsible Person with this role has same rights on the activity as the activity responsible Facility Safety Approval VSO (Visit Safety Officer) Professional Visits (by default DSOs) Facility Facility RSO Not used anywhere… Will be deleted in IMPACT Facility Operator TSO, RPO, LEXGLIMOS, RPE, RSO, Exp RSO…. Used in some safety procedures and managed in AIS Roles Other roles that are not managed by us 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

29 Creation of new Facility
Template to request a new facility or changes for an existing one: EDMS Concept of Facility was introduced by IMPACT back in 2011, but nowadays more systems are starting to use this category Ongoing discussion to find a better definition for the concepts Facility, Sub-facility, Complex… as well as the proper procedure to declare these categories at CERN 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

30 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Open discussion Main developments in 2016 Main Priorities for 2017 My Facility Configuration (Locations, Systems, Masks, Roles, Intervention Periods…) 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

31

32 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Backup slides 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators

33 IMPACT – Facility Administrators
Mask upgrade ATLAS Block Fields Current To be done DIMR not used (for the time being) Collapse the block by default WHEN Baseline dates not used to be hidden Schedule fields (intervention period, schedule dates,…) to be shown only: if you can edit or if not null “Date” Misleading Change label to “Proposed Start Date” “Earliest/Latest” Wrongly used “Warning time” “Granted time comments” HAZARDS Activity Hazards not used as it should to be mandatory “None” option shall be select when no hazards (instead of leaving the block empty) Co-activity Hazards 2 ‘hazards’ in 2015 (see list) Location Hazards 17 ‘hazards’ in 2015 (see list) DOCUMENTS (See list) for information 06-February-2017 IMPACT – Facility Administrators


Download ppt "IMPACT Facility Administrators Session"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google