Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byEarl Arnold Modified over 6 years ago
1
Primary-Only Imaging Condition And Interferometric Migration
M. Zhou Geology and Geophysics Department University of Utah
2
Outline POIC POIC-Radon Filter RTD+POIC Interferometric Migration (IM)
Summary
3
Outline POIC Why POIC What is POIC Examples Conclusions
4
Courtesy of Dr. Hongchuan Sun
3-Layer Model Depth (km) 5 Distance (km) 3 A Shot Gather Primary Time (s) Multiple 4 Trace Number 80 Courtesy of Dr. Hongchuan Sun
5
Courtesy of Dr. Hongchuan Sun
KM Image 3-Layer Model Depth (km) Depth (km) Multiple 5 5 Distance (km) 3 Distance (km) 3 Courtesy of Dr. Hongchuan Sun
6
Objective of POIC Data ( primary + multiple )
Primary-only imaging condition Image ( primary + multiple ) POIC Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
7
Outline POIC Why POIC What is POIC Examples Conclusions
8
obs Smear Event at along Ellipse Standard Migration Image Condition
Primary Multiple S R X S R Next few slides were shown last year, and I will briefly review them. Suppose we have a shot at position “s” and receiver at “r” which receiver the signals associated with a model. The standard Kirchhoff migration imaging condition use only the traveltime information to smear the data along an ellipse where the calculated traveltime matches the observed traveltime. The left panel is for the primaries, the primary energy is smeared to the correct positions. The right panel is for the multiple events, however, the energy is smeared to the wrong places which causes the migration artifacts. Depth Multiple artifacts X
9
obs pred. obs pred. obs pred. pred. pred.
Smear Event at along Ellipse if obs pred. = Migration + POIC Imaging Cond obs pred. = obs pred. = Primary Multiple S R X S R pred. In POIC, the angle information is used to separate the primaries with multiples. Only the primary events can satisfy both conditions, most of the non-zero offset multiples can not so that they are not migrated. It’s obvious that the POIC does not work well with the near-offset data because the angle differences between the primary and multiple events are very small. Depth pred. X
10
Outline POIC Why POIC What is POIC Examples Conclusions
SMARRT JV. Data Unocal Marine Data Conclusions
11
SMARRT JV. Pluto 1.5 Vp model
Depth (Km) 9 30 Distance (km)
12
Zero-offset Data 1 Time (Sec) 5 5 25 Distance (km)
13
POIC Image KM Image 1 Depth (km) 6 7 Distance (km) 30
14
KM Image POIC Image 1.0 Depth (km) 2.5 1.0 Depth (km) 2.5 5
Distance (km) 30
15
KM Image 4 Depth (km) 6 POIC Image 4 Depth (km) 6 7 Distance (km) 23
16
KM Image 5 Depth (km) 6 POIC Image 5 Depth (km) 6 9 Distance (km) 22
17
KM Image POIC Image 3 Depth (km) 5 25 30 25 30 Distance (km)
18
KM Image POIC Image 4 Depth (km) 6 10 20 10 20 3 Depth (km) 5 25 30 25
Distance (km) Distance (km)
19
Outline POIC Why POIC What is POIC Examples Conclusions SMARRT JV.
Unocal Marine Conclusions
20
Unocal Data 240 geophones per shot 236 shots in two lines
Common-shot gather 240 geophones per shot 236 shots in two lines 2-way time (s) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. Maximum data fold 60 3 Trace Number 240
21
Parabolic Radon Demultiple
Unocal Data Process Flow Chart Velocity CMP NMO Interval Velocity Radon CMP NMO Correction Parabolic Radon Demultiple Inverse NMO KM Migration POIC CSG Incidence Angle CRG Take-off Angle POIC Migration Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”.
22
Unocal Data Offset (Km) Offset (Km) 2 2 0.5 Time (s) Time (s) 2.0
2 2 0.5 Time (s) Time (s) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 2.0 CMP after NMO CMP after Radon
23
Stack image after Radon
Unocal Data Stack image Stack image after Radon 0.5 2-way time (s) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 3 400 1400 400 1400 CDP Number CDP Number
24
Unocal Data KM image Distance (Km) 8 KM image after Radon Depth (Km) 4
KM image after Radon Depth (Km) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 4 Distance (Km) 8
25
Unocal Data KM image POIC image Depth (Km) 4 Distance (Km) 8
Depth (Km) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 4 Distance (Km) 8 Distance (Km) 8
26
Zoom View KM image POIC image Distance (Km) 8 6 KM image after Radon
1.1 Depth (Km) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 1.6 6 8 Distance (Km)
27
Zoom View KM image KM image after Radon Distance (Km) 5.5 8.0
POIC image 2.0 Depth (Km) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 2.5 5.5 8.0 Distance (Km)
28
Zoom View KM image POIC image Distance (Km) KM image after Radon 3.5
4.5 1.2 Depth (Km) Good afternoon, my name is Min Zhou. My topic today is “POIC+Radon filtering of the near-offset multiples”. 1.6 3.5 4.5 Distance (Km)
29
Outline POIC Why POIC What is POIC Examples Conclusions
30
Conclusions POIC effectively remove some surface related multiples
POIC is as fast as Kirchhoff POIC performs better than the traditional Radon methods POIC Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
31
Conclusions POIC might miss weak events POIC uses simple kinematic
(pick more events) POIC uses simple kinematic ray- tracing (Wave-equation datuming) POIC performs better when near-offset data are not used (POIC-Radon Filter) POIC Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
32
Outline POIC POIC-Radon Filter RTD+POIC Interferometric Migration (IM)
Summary
33
Outline POIC-Radon Filter Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
34
POIC Review near-offset data are not used Problem:
POIC performs better when near-offset data are not used POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
35
Zoom views KM Image POIC Image 1 Depth (km) 3 7 Distance (km) 30 7
36
Original Data: CMP 8703 1 Time (s) 7 -2.0 0.0 2.0 Offset (km)
POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
37
Multiples by POIC: CMP 8703 1 Time (s) 7 -2.0 0.0 2.0 Offset (km)
POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
38
Outline POIC-Radon Filter Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
39
How to Fill the Near-offset Gaps?
Picking Prediction Interpolation Radon transform POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
40
Radon + POIC: Simple Test
Data Primaries Offset (km) -2 2 Multiples + Offset (km) -2 2 Predicted Multiples Time (s) 0.3 Offset (km) -2 2 POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Examples Conclusions
41
- t -p Domain Fitted Primaries Data Predicted Multiples
Fitted Primaries Data Predicted Multiples Fitted Multiples Fitted Multiples Predicted Multiples - Time (s) 0.3 p (us/m2) -0.05 0.15 p (us/m2) -0.05 0.15 POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Examples Conclusions
42
Radon + POIC: Simple Test
Errors Fitted Primaries Time (s) 0.3 Offset (km) -2 2 Offset (km) -2 2 POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Examples Conclusions
43
Outline POIC-Radon Filter Motivation Methodology Example: SMARRT Data
Conclusions
44
Predicted Multiples by POIC
SMAART Data: CMP8703 Data Predicted Multiples by POIC 1 1st 2nd water bottom 1st subsalt sediments 1st – 3rd salt top Time (s) 8 -2.5 2.5 -2.5 2.5 Offset (km) Offset (km)
45
Predicted Multiples by POIC
SMAART Data: CMP8703 Predicted Multiples by POIC Time (s) 9 Offset (km) -2.5 2.5 Primaries Fitted Multiples by Radon -2.5 2.5 Offset (km)
46
Depth Images with Near-offset Data
KM Image POIC Image Distance (km) 7 25 POIC+Radon Image 1 Depth (km) 8 7 25 Distance (km)
47
Depth Images with Near-offset Data
KM Image POIC Image POIC+Radon Image 1 Depth (km) 2.8 10 23 10 23 Distance (km) Distance (km)
48
Depth Images with Near-offset Data
KM Image POIC+Radon Image POIC Image 3.5 Depth (km) 6.5 10 24 10 24 Distance (km) Distance (km)
49
Depth Images with All Data
POIC Far-offset Data + POIC+Radon near offsets Distance (km) 7 25 POIC+Radon All Data Depth (km) Compare the images for all the data (near-offset + far-offset data). KM, POIC, and POIC+Radon. 8 7 25 Distance (km)
50
Outline POIC-Radon Filter Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
51
Conclusions POIC-Radon filter can separate multiples and primaries in near offsets Near-offset multiples should be predictable by far-offset ones in t - p domain POIC-Radon Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
52
Outline POIC POIC-Radon Filter RTD+POIC Interferometric Migration (IM)
Conclusions
53
Outline RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
54
POIC Review POIC uses simple kinematic ray- tracing Problem:
RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
55
Why RTD KM Image POIC Image 1 Depth (km) 3 7 Distance (km) 30 7
Another zoom view, the multiple artifacts associated with the water bottom are also removed. But the image resolution from POIC is not so good as the one from KM due to lack of the near-offset data. 3 7 Distance (km) 30 7 Distance (km) 30
56
Why RTD KM image POIC image 6 Depth (km) 9 5 25 5 25 Distance (km)
Compare the images for all the data (near-offset + far-offset data). KM, POIC, and POIC+Radon. 9 5 25 5 25 Distance (km) Distance (km) RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
57
Large velocity variation
Why RTD Offset (km) Complex Rough topography Large velocity variation Accurate Expensive RTM RTD + Depth (km) Phase-shift Kirchhoff POIC Efficient Approx. Less Complex
58
Outline RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
59
d(x’|x’’)=g*(s|x’) d(s|x”)
Implement RTD d(s|x’’) d(s|r) d(x’|x’’) d(s|x’’) S R d(s|x’’)= g*(r|x’’) d(s|r) Depth d(x’|x’’)=g*(s|x’) d(s|x”) x’’ x’ Distance
60
Outline RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example: SMARRT Data
Conclusions
61
SMAART JV. Pluto 1.5 Vp model
RTD + POIC SMAART JV. Pluto 1.5 Vp model Depth (Km) 9 30 Distance (km)
62
Zero-offset Data After Datuming Reflectivity Model Below Datum
SMAART JV Data Time (Sec) Zero-offset Data After Datuming 1 Reflectivity Model Below Datum Depth (Km) 7 Distance (km) 10 20 5
63
Zero-offset Data from surface
1 Time (Sec) 5 5 25 Distance (km)
64
KM Depth Images Before Datuming After Datuming 6 Depth (km) 9 5 25 5
Compare the images for all the data (near-offset + far-offset data). KM, POIC, and POIC+Radon. 9 5 25 5 25 Distance (km) Distance (km) RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
65
POIC Depth Images Before Datuming After Datuming 6 Depth (km) 9 5 25 5
Compare the images for all the data (near-offset + far-offset data). KM, POIC, and POIC+Radon. 9 5 25 5 25 Distance (km) Distance (km) RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
66
Depth Images after Redatuming
KM image POIC image Reflectivity Model 6 Depth (km) Compare the images for all the data (near-offset + far-offset data). KM, POIC, and POIC+Radon. 9 5 25 5 25 Distance (km) Distance (km) Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
67
Depth Images after Redatuming
KM image POIC image Depth (km) Distance (km) Distance (km) Distance (km) Depth (km) Compare the images for all the data (near-offset + far-offset data). KM, POIC, and POIC+Radon. RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
68
Outline POIC-Radon Filter Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
69
Conclusions RTD helps reveal deeper structure
RTD + KM provides good depth image RTD + POIC helps to suppress multiples and preserve the primaries RTD + POIC Motivation Methodology Example Conclusions
70
Outline POIC POIC-Radon Filter RTD+POIC Interferometric Migration (IM)
Summary
71
Outline Interferometric Migration Motivation Theory Examples
Synthetic Data Chevron Field Data Conclusions
72
Motivation Migrate the CDP data, we need to correct:
Shot / geophone statics Overburden velocity errors RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
73
Outline Interferometric Migration Motivation Theory Examples
Synthetic Data Chevron Field Data Conclusions
74
Theory: Reduced Time Migration
obs oil Standard Mig: = m(x) d(g,s) e t - i cal oil w t obs ref Surface t cal oil obs - = tstatics tmodel + mig t cal ref obs - = tstatics tmodel + mig Reference = tstatics tmodel ~ Oil RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
75
Theory: Reduced Time Migration
obs oil Standard Mig: = m(x) d(g,s) e t - i cal oil w t obs ref t mig oil ref ~ = Surface RTM Mig: = m(x) d(g,s) e -i w t cal oil mig ( ) + d(g,s) ~ = t cal oil e -i w ) + mig ref ( _ t obs ref ) cal oil e -i w + ( _ ) t cal oil ( ref d(g,s) = e -i w obs Reference f(g,s) Oil d(g,s) f(g,s) = e -i w t obs ref RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
76
Theory: Reduced Time Migration
Three steps for RTM: 1. Pick the reference reflection times t obs ref d(g,s) f(g,s) = e -i w t obs ref 2. Shift the data with picked times 3. Migrate the shifted data by RTM formula: m(x) _ = ) t cal oil ( ref e -i w f(g,s) RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
77
Theory: Interferometric Migration
d(s|g) s g Surface using 1) d(s|g) d(s’|g’) t obs (s’|s) ref (g’|g) , g’ s’ d(s’|g’) 2) Migrate d(s’|g’) t cal (x|s’) (x|g’) , using Reference Oil x RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
78
Theory: Interferometric Migration
d(s|g) For fixed s, g and x, how to find s’ and g’? s g Surface g” Fermat’s Principle specular t (x|g’|g) < (x|g”|g) diffraction g’ s’ Reference picked = t (x|g’|g) (g’|g) (x|g’) + calculated Oil x RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
79
Theory: Reduced Time Migration
Three steps for IM: 1. Pick the reference reflection times t obs ref 2. Find specular points s’ and g’ at reference layer 3. Migrate the data by IM formula: m(x) + = ) t obs ss’ e -i w f(g,s) cal ( s’x gg’ g’x RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
80
Outline Interferometric Migration Motivation Theory Examples
Synthetic Data Chevron Field Data Conclusions
81
Synthetic Test: Model 10m X 10m grid 300 shots/geophones
3 Offset (km) 1 2 Depth (km) km/s 4.5 10m X 10m grid 3.5 300 shots/geophones 20 Hz Ricker wavelet 2.5 The first synthetic model is discretized onto a mesh of 51 by 81 gridpoints with a grid spacing of 1 meter. There are 41 shots and 41 geophones located at the shot/geophone wells with an interval of 2 m. The synthetic shot gathers are calculated by the FD wave equation solver with a 200 hz Ricker wavelet. 1.5 True Model RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
82
Migration Velocity Model
Synthetic Test: Model 3 Offset (km) 1 2 Depth (km) 3 Offset (km) 3.5 4.5 1.5 2.5 km/s 1 2 The first synthetic model is discretized onto a mesh of 51 by 81 gridpoints with a grid spacing of 1 meter. There are 41 shots and 41 geophones located at the shot/geophone wells with an interval of 2 m. The synthetic shot gathers are calculated by the FD wave equation solver with a 200 hz Ricker wavelet. True Model Migration Velocity Model RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
83
Synthetic Test: Migration
3 Offset (km) 3 Offset (km) 0.8 2 0.8 2 IM Image with Wrong Model Depth (km) The first synthetic model is discretized onto a mesh of 51 by 81 gridpoints with a grid spacing of 1 meter. There are 41 shots and 41 geophones located at the shot/geophone wells with an interval of 2 m. The synthetic shot gathers are calculated by the FD wave equation solver with a 200 hz Ricker wavelet. KM Image with Wrong Model RTM Image with Wrong Model RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
84
Incorrect Reference Depth
3 Offset (km) 3 Offset (km) 0.8 2 0.8 2 RTM Image (undulating reference) RTM Image (reference at 0.9 km) Depth (km) The first synthetic model is discretized onto a mesh of 51 by 81 gridpoints with a grid spacing of 1 meter. There are 41 shots and 41 geophones located at the shot/geophone wells with an interval of 2 m. The synthetic shot gathers are calculated by the FD wave equation solver with a 200 hz Ricker wavelet. KM Image with Wrong Model RTM Image (reference at 0.8 km) RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
85
Outline Interferometric Migration Motivation Theory Examples
Synthetic Data Chevron Field Data Conclusions
86
Stack section (courtesy of Jianming Sheng)
Field Data: stack Offset (km) 12 0.5 990 shots 180 geophones Interval 25 m Two-way Time (s) trace length s Synthetic fault model which is discretized one to a 61 by 141 grid with a grid interval of 1.5 m. 18 sources and 36 geophones are located at the left and right sides of the model, respectively. sample interval 4 ms 4.0 Stack section (courtesy of Jianming Sheng) RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
87
Field Data: Time migration Time Migration with NMO Velocity
Offset (km) 12 One-way Time (s) Synthetic fault model which is discretized one to a 61 by 141 grid with a grid interval of 1.5 m. 18 sources and 36 geophones are located at the left and right sides of the model, respectively. 1.5 Time Migration with NMO Velocity RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
88
Field Data: Time migration Standard Time Migration with NMO Velocity
6 Offset (km) 12 0.4 One-way Time (s) Synthetic fault model which is discretized one to a 61 by 141 grid with a grid interval of 1.5 m. 18 sources and 36 geophones are located at the left and right sides of the model, respectively. 1.4 Standard Time Migration with NMO Velocity RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
89
Field Data: Time migration Standard Time Migration with NMO Velocity
6 Offset (km) 12 0.4 One-way Time (s) Synthetic fault model which is discretized one to a 61 by 141 grid with a grid interval of 1.5 m. 18 sources and 36 geophones are located at the left and right sides of the model, respectively. 1.4 Standard Time Migration with NMO Velocity RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
90
Field Data: Time migration Standard Time Migration
Offset (km) 8 11 0.5 RTM Time Migration One-way Time (s) Synthetic fault model which is discretized one to a 61 by 141 grid with a grid interval of 1.5 m. 18 sources and 36 geophones are located at the left and right sides of the model, respectively. 0.8 Standard Time Migration RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
91
Field Data: Time migration Standard Time Migration
Offset (km) 7 11 0.9 RTM Time Migration One-way Time (s) Synthetic fault model which is discretized one to a 61 by 141 grid with a grid interval of 1.5 m. 18 sources and 36 geophones are located at the left and right sides of the model, respectively. 1.2 Standard Time Migration RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
92
Outline Interferometric Migration Motivation Theory Examples
Synthetic Data Chevron Field Data Conclusions
93
Conclusions RTM/IM is effective in suppressing:
statics; RTM/IM is effective in suppressing: timing error by overburden velocity. RTM/IM is as cheap as standard migration RTM focuses structures with incorrect reference geometry RTM Motivation Theory Examples Conclusions
94
Outline POIC POIC-Radon Filter RTD+POIC Interferometric Migration (IM)
Summary
95
Summary Apply POIC to SMARRT & Unocal data Develop POIC-Radon filter
Combine POIC with RTD Apply IM and RTD to CDP data
96
Acknowledgements I thank Jerry for his guidance, support and encouragement I thank my committee members for their comments and support
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.