Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Aggression and Rejection
2
Types of aggression Physical vs. verbal
Relational (includes ostracism) Direct and indirect Displaced and Triggered displaced Active vs. passive Reactive vs. proactive Antisocial behavior vs. aggression vs. violence
3
Operational definitions
Aggression questionnaire (Buss & Perry, 1972) Conflict Tactics Scales (Straus et al., 1996) Olweus Bullying and Victimization Questionnaire (Olweus, 1996) Peer nominations Experimental manipulations What is the best way to measure aggression?
4
Theories/Models Cause Type of aggression “Cure”
Other questions/comments from book chapter?
5
Evolutionary perspective
Aggression evolved so that men can establish dominance over other men and get higher status to protect their mates from other men Testosterone effects Chimpanzees vs. bonobos
6
Cultural influences Culture Time
Herding cultures (Southern Culture of Honor, Nisbett, Cohen) Gender
7
Motivational perspectives
Physiological arousal theories (excitation transfer; Zillman, 1979) Frustration-aggression hypothesis (Dollard et al., 1939; Berkowitz, 1989) Cognitive-neoassociation model (Berkowitz, 1993) Frustration leads to aggression if Have anger Important goal Blocked more times Blocked to a greater extent
8
Social learning perspective (Bandura)
We learn aggression from watching others, especially if there are no negative consequences for it. Bobo doll study Mirror neurons Social norms
9
Cognitive perspective
Scripts (Huesmann, 1982) Hostile attributional bias (Dodge, 1982) Social information processing model (Crick & Dodge, 1994) Encode (notice) Interpret situation Decide on goal Think of possible responses Evaluate possible responses Enactment (do it)
10
Cognitive perspective
Social interactionist approach (Tedeschi & Felson, 1994) General aggression model (Anderson & Bushman, 2002) Person inputs Situation inputs Internal states
11
General aggression model (Anderson; Figure 8.2)
12
Violent video game effects
What does the APA report suggest? On what areas are there still not much data? Are there alternative explanations for these effects?
13
Hilgard et al response What are their critiques of the Anderson et al., 2010 meta-analysis? Is this an issue with other things we “know”? What did they do differently with the data? What is the small study problem? What did they find? What do they suggest for the field?
14
Results of Meta-Analyses for All Outcomes
Calvert, S. L., Appelbaum, M., Dodge, K. A., Graham, S., Nagayama Hall, G. C., Hamby, S., Hedges, L. V. (2017). The American Psychological Association Task Force assessment of violent video games: Science in the service of public interest. American Psychologist, 72(2), © 2017 American Psychological Association
15
Response (Kepes et al., 2017) What is their response?
How do they support it? What other possible moderators may help explain the heterogeneity?
16
Moral disengagement theory (Bandura, 1999)
What perspective is it most closely related to? How could it explain the effects of videogame violence on self-control, cheating, and aggression? Moral disengagement scale Why would some people be more affected than others? What do these results suggest we should do about violent video games?
17
Comparison of the Effect of Violent Media on Aggression With Effects From Other Domains
Note. All correlations are significantly different from zero. a = the effect of smoking tobacco on lung cancer, as estimated by pooling the data from Figures 1 and 3 in Wynder and Graham's (1950) classic article. The remaining effects were estimated from meta-analyses: b = Paik and Comstock (1994), c = Weller (1993), d = Wells (1998), e = Needleman and Gatsonis (1990), f = Fiore, Smith, Jorenby, and Baker (1994), g = Welten, Kemper, Post, and van Staveren (1995), h = Cooper (1989), i = Smith, Handley, and Wood (1990), and j = Hill, White, Jolley, and Mapperson (1988). Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56(6-7), © 2001 American Psychological Association
18
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Scientific Studies on Media-Related Aggression
Note. A positive correlation indicates that media violence was positively related to aggression. Capped vertical bars denote 99.9% confidence intervals. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56(6-7), © 2001 American Psychological Association
19
Cumulative Meta-Analysis of Experimental and Nonexperimental Studies on Media-Related Aggression
Note. A positive correlation indicates that media violence was positively related to aggression. Capped vertical bars denote 99.9% confidence intervals. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56(6-7), © 2001 American Psychological Association
20
Effect of Media Violence on Aggression: News Reports Versus Scientific Studies
Note. Ratings based on news reports are positive if the article said that exposure to media violence is positively related to aggression. Correlations based on scientific studies are positive if media violence was positively related to aggression. Bushman, B. J., & Anderson, C. A. (2001). Media violence and the American public: Scientific facts versus media misinformation. American Psychologist, 56(6-7), © 2001 American Psychological Association
21
Media effects on aggression
How does the media cover violent media? Does this occur in other areas of science? What can scientists do to reduce/address this problem? Why do people think there is less of a link than there is? What are our obligations as scientists to the public?
22
What about guns/mass shootings?
More guns per capita, different attitude about guns. Not mental health, violence otherwise
23
Person factors in aggression
Trait aggression Unstable self-esteem (“hollow”; Baumeister)
24
Situational effects on aggression
Provocation Weapons effect (Berkowitz) Alcohol and primes Heat, noise, crowding, air pollution Media violence/video games Bad moods Pain Revenge Testosterone Serotonin Marijuana Crowds/Anonymity
25
Reducing aggression What doesn’t work? Why? What does work? Why?
What should we do as parents? Individuals? Society?
26
Rejection How has rejection been studied? Are these equivalent?
Sociometer approach (Leary) Temporal need-threat model (Williams) What needs does rejection affect? What are the consequences of rejection? Why are people rejected? What purpose could rejection serve?
27
Smart Richman & Leary, 2009 First feel bad and have lowered self-esteem Then react based on how you think about the situation: Perception of fairness Pervasiveness High value of relationship Expectations of relationship repair Possibility of alternative relationships High perceived cost of rejection Then 1 of 3 reactions: Make friends Hurt the one who hurt you Avoid further rejection
28
Multimotive model of reactions to interpersonal rejection experiences.
Smart Richman, L., & Leary, M. R. (2009). Reactions to discrimination, stigmatization, ostracism, and other forms of interpersonal rejection: A multimotive model. Psychological Review, 116(2), doi: /a © 2009 American Psychological Association
29
Responsive theory of social exclusion (Freedman, Wms, Beer, 2016)
What does it add to previous approaches? What are the source’s needs in rejection? What types of social exclusion does it describe? Examples? Is explicit rejection best? What are possible moderators? What makes for a nicer explicit rejection? How may culture affect this?
30
Coming up Terrorism and extremism (8 articles, no chapters)
Nov 13 if you want feedback on paper Final exam and questions Paper rubric
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.