Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

DS11 T Transfer function, integral field and coil length

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "DS11 T Transfer function, integral field and coil length"— Presentation transcript:

1 DS11 T Transfer function, integral field and coil length
Susana Izquierdo Bermudez, Lucio Fiscarelli Acknowledgments: Frederic Savary, Herve Prin, Luca Bottura 31sOctober 2017 109th HiLumi WP2 Meeting

2 Requirements and design evolution
MBHDP102/ Prototype/ Series MBHDP101 Requirement: 119.2 Tm at kA Main design evolution features from the first to the second short model (and prototype): Outer yoke radius 275 mm  270 mm (to be compatible with LHC-MB tooling) Iron laminations at the magnet extremities replaced by non-magnetic laminations (to decrease the peak field in the coil ends) Due to time constrains and additional uncertainty on the final coil length (mainly due to the lack of experience in terms of dimensional changes during heat treatment in 5.5 m length Nb3Sn coils), the coil length of the prototype coils was not modified to account for the design evolution. Aim of today: summarize the available data from the short model program (and prototype collared coils assemblies) and propose adjustments for the series coils.

3 Collared coil magnetic measurements (RT)
Transfer function in the straight section, integral field and magnetic length is within 10 units the expected values Difference among apertures in terms of integral field: Around 25 (σ) units in the short models (6 apertures measured) Around 10 (σ) units in the prototype (3 apertures measured) Collared Coil Room temperature measurements (± 20 A) Short models Prototype TF (T/kA) Central Segment Integral (Tm/kA) Magnetic length (mm) Average all single apertures 0.7969 1.3460 1689 0.7940 4.2221 5317.8 STD (units) 7 23 21 2 6 ROXIE 3D 0.7972 1.3473 1690 0.7947 4.2272 5319 diff to ROXIE 2D (units) 28 n.a -10 diff to ROXIE 3D (units) -4 -7 -12 -2

4 Cold mass magnetic measurements (RT)
DP102 and Prototype Field in the magnet centre is within 10 units the expected value for the double aperture magnets. Integral field is 24 units larger than measured in average, with difference in between the two apertures up to 36 units. In the single aperture models, the difference in between magnets was up to 60 units. DP101 Cold Mass Room temperature measurements (± 20 A) (double aperture) TF (T/kA) Central Segment Integral (Tm/kA) Magnetic length (mm) Magnet DP101 DP102 Average two apertures 0.9903 0.9910 1.6772 1.6627 1694 1678 STD (units) 1 5 18 6 17 ROXIE 3D 0.9912 0.9909 1.6732 1.6587 1688 1674 diff to ROXIE 2D (units) -20 -12 n.a diff to ROXIE 3D (units) -9 24 33 23

5 Magnetic measurement operation conditions
Iron saturation effects are well captured by ROXIE when considering the 3D model. The measured field in the straight part is within 10 units the expected value for all current levels. Since measurements in the short models are performed using a rotating shaft at cold, there is not an accurate evaluation of the integral field and magnetic length available. Susana Izquierdo Bermudez

6 From short model experience to prototype and series magnets
Expected field in the prototype magnet Cold mass, RT - 20 A 1.9 K, kA TF (T/kA) (±10 units) (±10 units) Integral (Tm/kA) (+20, -10 units) (+20, -10 units) REQUIREMENT: Lm (mm) 5280 (+20, -10 units) 5264 (+20, -10 units) Possible action to adjust integral field in the series magnets: Option 1: Physical coil length is modified in order to reach the target integral field in the series magnet Coil has to be mm longer than in the prototype Option 2: The difference on the integral field with respect to the target is compensated using the trim circuit This will mean that at nominal magnet current, the trim should operate at A (instead of ~ 0 A)

7 Proposed solution Increase the coil physical length by 40 mm in the straight section. This action can be done with minor impact in the cold mass assembly and coil production process. After the full magnetic characterization of the prototype magnet, a more accurate evaluation of the expected field for the series magnets can be done. Deviations from nominal case can still be corrected by: Increasing or reducing the number of non-magnetic laminations in the magnet extremities. Maximum increase of the magnetic length is 14 mm, and increases the peak field in the coil ends by 0.2 T. Modifying the trim circuit current profile. 10 mm deviation on the magnetic length corresponds to ~ 20 A shift in the trim circuit current at nominal current.

8 Additional slides

9 Feedback from short models program
MBHSP101* MBHSP102 MBHSP103 MBHSP104/4b MBHSP105/5b Coil 106 (RRP 108/127) Coil 106 (RRP 108/127) Coil 109 (RRP 132/169) Coil 112 (RRP 132/169) Coil 114 (RRP 150/169) Coil 107 (limiting coil) (RRP 108/127) Coil 108 (RRP 132/169) Coil 111 (RRP 132/169) Coil 113 (limiting coil)  109 in SP104b (RRP 132/169) Coil 115 (RRP 150/169) Assembled in MBHDP101 Assembled in MBHDP102 MBHSP# MBHDP101 MBHDP102 * Magnetic measurements performed with a different shaft, issues on the collared coil measurements, calibration questionable, so not accounted for this analysis

10 Trim current assuming the prototype is 43 mm shorter than nominal

11 Coil Manufacturing data – Prototype coils
Collared Coil CR0002 CR4 CR5 Start fabrication 23/02/2016 17/06/2016 End fabrication 16/03/2017 24/04/2017 Cross section ID 1st Gen Conductor and cable Strand lay-out RRP 132/169 &150/169 Cable ID H15OC0194A H15OC0196A Azimuthal coil size dev.(µm)  Min -58 -125 Max 165 228 25 % 30 -43 75 % 75 34 Median 54 -10 Average 52 Coil length (mm)  LHCMBH_C0005 Nominal post length 5113 Nominal coil length 5559 Post length for winding 5111.5 5113.1 Post length after curing 5106.4 5108.6 Post length after react. 5110 5112 Post length after impr. 5113.2 Coil length after impr. 5560.8 Collared Coil CR003 CR6 CR7 Start fabrication 09/02/2016 12/04/2016 End fabrication /2017 Cross section ID 1st Gen Conductor and cable Strand lay-out RRP 108/127 Cable ID H15OC0209A H15OC0210A Azimuthal coil size dev.(µm)  Min -0.474 -0.222 Max -0.038 0.390 25 % -0.164 -0.020 75 % -0.001 0.180 Median -0.076 0.052 Average -0.079 0.076 Coil length (mm)  LHCMBH_C0005 Nominal post length 5113 Nominal coil length 5559 Post length for winding 5108 5109 Post length after curing 5107 Post length after react. 5114 Post length after impr. 5116 5110 Coil length after impr. 5560 5562 Coil Manufacturing Data from MTF


Download ppt "DS11 T Transfer function, integral field and coil length"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google