Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Introduction to Phylogenetic Systematics

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Introduction to Phylogenetic Systematics"— Presentation transcript:

1 Introduction to Phylogenetic Systematics
Mark Fishbein Dept. Biological Sciences Mississippi State University 13 October 2003

2 Which of these critters are most closely related?

3 alligator gila monster purple gallinule ? gopher tortoise kingsnake

4 Phylogeny Branching history of evolutionary lineages
New branches arise via speciation Speciation occurs when gene flow is severed between populations Phylogenetic relationships depicted as a tree

5 © W. S. Judd, et al., Plant Systematics

6 © W. S. Judd, et al., Plant Systematics

7 } Phylogenetic data Morphology Secondary chemistry Cytology
Allele frequencies Protein sequences Restriction sites DNA sequences } “Molecular” data

8 Molecular (genetic) data
Proteins Serology (immunoassay) Isozymes (electrophoretic variants) Amino acid sequences DNA Structural (translocations, inversions, duplications) Restriction sites DNA sequences Substitutions Insertions/Deletions

9 What are genes? From Raven et al. (1999), Biology of Plants

10 Genomes All of the genes within a cell are the genome
Genes located in the nucleus are the nuclear genome Other genomes (organellar) Mitochondrion: mitochondrial genome Chloroplast: plastid genome

11 nucleus chloroplast mitochondrion
From Raven et al., 1999, Biology of Plants

12 Comparison of Genomes Nuclear Mitochondrial Plastid Size Large Small
Number Multiple Single Shape of Chromosomes Linear Circular Ploidy Diploid Haploid Inheritance Biparental Uniparental

13 Structural rearrangements
Inversion Crossing over, duplication, and loss From Freeman and Herron (1998), Evolutionary Analysis

14 Chemistry of Genes DNA Parallel strands linked together
Linear array of units called nucleotides Phosphate Sugar: deoxyribose One of four bases Adenine (“A”) Cytosine (“C”) Guanine (“G”) Thymine (“T”)

15 From Raven et al. (1999), Biology of Plants

16 DNA structure Paired strands are linked by bases
A must bond with T G must bond with C Each link is composed of a purine and a pyrimidine A & G are purines C & T are pyrimidines

17 DNA function DNA is code for making proteins (and a few other molecules) Proteins are the structures and enzymes that catalyze biochemical reactions that are essential for the function of an organism DNA code is read and converted to protein in two steps Transcription: DNA is copied to messenger RNA Translation: messenger RNA is template for protein

18 DNA code A gene is a code composed of a string of nucleotide bases (A’s, C’s, G’s, T’s) A protein is composed of a string of amino acids (there are 20) How does the DNA code get translated into protein?

19 DNA code Each amino acid is coded for by at least one triplet of nucleotide bases in DNA Each triplet is called a codon There are 64 possible codons (4 bases, 3 positions = 43)

20 From Raven et al. (1999), Biology of Plants

21 DNA functional classes
Coding Proteins (exons) Ribosomes (RNA) Transfer RNA “Non-coding” Introns Spacers

22 From Raven et al. (1999), Biology of Plants

23 Homology in Molecular Systematics
Assess orthology Align sequences Homology is often implicit (is this a good thing?)

24 DNA Sequences and Homology
Homology: similarity due to common descent How do we assess homology of DNA sequences? Levels of homology Locus Allele Nucleotide position

25 From W. P. Maddison (1997), Systematic Biology 46:527

26 Orthology vs. Paralogy DNA sequences that are at homologous loci are orthologous DNA sequences that are similar due to duplication but are at different loci are paralogous Orthology may be best detected with a phylogenetic analysis of all sequences

27 From Martin & Burg (2002), Systematic Biology 51:578

28 Multiple Sequence Alignment
Goal: create data matrix in which columns are homologous positions Problem: sequences vary in length Why? Insertions Deletions

29 Simple Sequence Alignment
Taxon 1 GTACGTTG Taxon 2 GTACGTTG Taxon 3 GTACGTTG Taxon 4 GTACATTG Taxon 5 GTACATTG Taxon 6 GTACATTG

30 Simple Sequence Alignment
Taxon 1 GTACGTTG Taxon 2 GTACGTTG Taxon 3 GTACGTTG Taxon 4 GTACATTG Taxon 5 GTACATTG Taxon 6 GTACATTG

31 DNA Sequence Data Matrix
G T A C T2 T3 T4 T5 T6

32 Slightly Less Simple Sequence Alignment
Taxon 1 AGAGTGAC Taxon 2 AGAGTGAC Taxon 3 AGAGTGAC Taxon 4 AGAGGAC Taxon 5 AGAGGAC Taxon 6 AGAGGAC

33 Slightly Less Simple Sequence Alignment
Taxon 1 AGAGTGAC Taxon 2 AGAGTGAC Taxon 3 AGAGTGAC Taxon 4 AGAG-GAC Taxon 5 AGAG-GAC Taxon 6 AGAG-GAC

34 Alignment Gaps Gaps are inserted to maximize homology across nucleotide positions Gaps are hypothesized indels Inserting a gap assumes that an indel event is a better explanation of the differences among sequences than nucleotide substitution

35 Taxon 1 AGAGTGAC Taxon 2 AGAGTGAC Taxon 3 AGAGTGAC Taxon 4 AGAGGAC
3 substitutions 0 indels 0 substitutions 1 indels

36 Ambiguous Alignment with a Single-Base Indel
Taxon 1 GGTCAG Taxon 2 GGCCAA Taxon 3 AGCTAA Taxon 4 AGCAA Taxon 5 AGCAA Taxon 6 AGCAA

37 Ambiguous Alignment with a Single-Base Indel
Taxon 1 GGTCAG GGTCAG Taxon 2 GGCCAA GGCCAA Taxon 3 AGCTAA AGCTAA Taxon 4 AG-CAA AGC-AA Taxon 5 AG-CAA AGC-AA Taxon 6 AG-CAA AGC-AA 4 substitutions 1 indels 4 substitutions 1 indels

38 Gap Number and Length All else being equal, is it better to assume fewer longer gaps, or more shorter gaps? In other words, what is more likely: For a new indel to occur? For an existing indel to lengthen? There is no general answer! Alternate alignments are explored algorithmically

39 Alignment Algorithms Typically built up from pairwise alignments, using assumed gap costs Problem: most algorithms require an initial tree to define alignment order--bias Solution: simultaneous tree estimation and alignment optimization Problems: costly, unjustifiable parameters

40 Clustal Alignment Algorithm
Creates alignment based on penalties for gap opening (number of gaps) and gap extension (gap length) Multiple alignment built according to guide tree determined by pairwise alignments Order of adding sequences determined by a guide tree

41 Clustal Alignment Algorithm
Distance matrix calculated from pairwise comparisons Dendrogram calculated from from distance matrix Additional sequences are added according to dendrogram, until all sequences are added Alignment calculated for most similar pair of sequences, based on alignment parameters

42 Tree-Based Alignment Simultaneous tree and alignment estimation using parsimony TreeAlign MALIGN Implement similar gap opening/extension costs These applications are very slow!

43 Alignment in the Future?
Incorporate a more sophisticated understanding of molecular evolution in parameterization For example, what are realistic values of gap costs? Are they universal? Can phylogeny estimation proceed without optimizing alignments? Likelihood based methods can sum over all alignments Will require major contribution of biologists

44 Methods of tree estimation
Character based Maximum parsimony (MP) Fewest character changes Maximum likelihood (ML) Highest probability of observing data, given a model Bayesian Similar to ML, but incorporates prior knowledge Distance based Minimum distance Shortest summed branch lengths

45 Major classes of data Character-based Distance-based Bird A G T
Alligator Lizard C Snake Tortoise Character-based Distance-based Alligator Lizard Snake Tortoise Bird 0.20 0.60 1.00 0.00 0.80

46 Minimum Distance Alligator Lizard Snake Tortoise Bird 0.20 0.60 1.00
0.00 0.80

47 Maximum Parsimony 3, 5 are slightly more 2: C complicated... 1: A 4: G
Bird A G T Alligator Lizard C Snake Tortoise 3, 5 are slightly more complicated... 2: C 1: A 4: G

48 Parsimony Criterion j = character L = tree length
N = number of characters w = character weight diff (x1, x2) = number of steps along branch L = tree length = topology k = branch B = number of branches

49 Parsimonious Character Reconstruction
To evaluate the parsimony of a tree, each character is optimized (then the sum is computed) Several parsimony algorithms have been developed that optimize character reconstructions Algorithms differ in assumptions about permissible transformations between character states

50 Likelihood Criterion L = tree likelihood = topology
j = character (site) l = site likelihood

51 Site Likelihoods lk, the probability of the nucleotides of each sequence at a given site, is the product of probabilities along the branches of the tree The probability along a branch is the product of Probability of a substitution Branch length Summed over ancestral states

52 Substitution Model Many models have been proposed
Elements are the rate of substitution of one base for another, per site Rates are instantaneous (probability of change in a short period of time) Rates may be allowed to vary among sites

53 Maximum Likelihood 1 2 3 4 5 Bird A G T Alligator Lizard C Snake Tortoise Tree is selected that maximizes likelihood of observed sequences, given a model of substitution

54 The Molecular Systematics Revolution
Dramatic increase in the size of data sets Characters, taxa Increased confidence in homology assessment? Computational advances Technology Algorithms and software

55 Large Data Sets Pre-1990: up to ~25 taxa (rarely 100), 1 gene or up to 100 morphological characters 1998: 2538 rbcL sequences of green plants; entire mtDNA sequences (15,000 bp) in animals 2004: ??

56 The Large Data Set Headache
Problem: the large number of sequences, not the size of sequences Application of phylogenetic optimality criteria requires evaluation of all possible trees Algorithms guaranteed to find optimal solutions have limited applicability

57 The Problem of Finding Optimal Trees
There are too many trees to evaluate! The number of possible topologies increases very rapidly with the number of taxa/samples There are [(2m - 5)!] / [2m-3(m-3)!] unrooted trees , where m = number of taxa

58 Taxa Trees ,135 stars in the universe atoms in the universe From Hillis et al. (1996), Applications of Molecular Systematics

59 Heuristic Methods Starting trees followed by rearrangement
Starting trees sample “tree space” Rearrangements search for local optima How to get starting trees? How to rearrange trees? These methods are prone to getting trapped on local optima

60 Cutting-edge Methods Ratchet Annealing algorithms Genetic algorithms
Temporarily “warps” the character space Annealing algorithms Accept suboptimal trees and gradual movement towards optima Genetic algorithms Analogous to evolution by natural selection

61 Using Phylogenies Why are birds so different than their closest relatives? What genes are involved in the origin of novel traits (like wings)? Is the rate of molecular evolution in birds especially high?

62


Download ppt "Introduction to Phylogenetic Systematics"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google