1. Figure 1 Decision tree model showing the three strategies for prevention and control of diabetes and hypertension.
From: Is diabetes and hypertension screening worthwhile in resource-limited settings? An economic evaluation based on a pilot of a Package of Essential Non-communicable disease interventions in Bhutan
Health Policy Plan. 2014;30(8): doi: /heapol/czu106
Health Policy Plan | Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2014; all rights reserved.

2. Figure 2 Markov model representing the possible events for (a) patients with diabetes without complications, (b) coronary artery disease, (c) stroke, (d) retinopathy, (e) neuropathy, (f) nephropathy and death.
From: Is diabetes and hypertension screening worthwhile in resource-limited settings? An economic evaluation based on a pilot of a Package of Essential Non-communicable disease interventions in Bhutan
Health Policy Plan. 2014;30(8): doi: /heapol/czu106
Health Policy Plan | Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2014; all rights reserved.

3. Figure 3 Markov model representing the events that could occur for patients with hypertension and its complications.
From: Is diabetes and hypertension screening worthwhile in resource-limited settings? An economic evaluation based on a pilot of a Package of Essential Non-communicable disease interventions in Bhutan
Health Policy Plan. 2014;30(8): doi: /heapol/czu106
Health Policy Plan | Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2014; all rights reserved.

4. Figure 4 (a) Cost-effectiveness plane demonstrating the incremental costs and incremental disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of ‘current PEN program’ compared with ‘no screening. (b) Cost-effectiveness plane demonstrating the incremental costs and incremental disability-adjusted life years (DALYs) of ‘universal screening’ compared with ‘no screening’.
From: Is diabetes and hypertension screening worthwhile in resource-limited settings? An economic evaluation based on a pilot of a Package of Essential Non-communicable disease interventions in Bhutan
Health Policy Plan. 2014;30(8): doi: /heapol/czu106
Health Policy Plan | Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2014; all rights reserved.

5. Figure 5 One-way sensitivity analysis on the prevalence of diabetes, co-morbidity of diabetes and hypertension, and hypertension, resulting in different incremental cost-effectiveness ratios of ‘current PEN program’ and ‘universal screening’ compared with ‘no screening’. DM, diabetes; DMHT, diabetes with hypertension; HT, hypertension.
From: Is diabetes and hypertension screening worthwhile in resource-limited settings? An economic evaluation based on a pilot of a Package of Essential Non-communicable disease interventions in Bhutan
Health Policy Plan. 2014;30(8): doi: /heapol/czu106
Health Policy Plan | Published by Oxford University Press in association with The London School of Hygiene and Tropical Medicine © The Author 2014; all rights reserved.