1. <month year>
doc: IEEE c
September 2005
Project: IEEE P Working Group for Wireless Personal Area Networks (WPANs)
Submission Title: [An Update to 60 GHz Channel Modeling Work Using IBM Measurement Set]
Date Submitted: [September 2005]
Source: [Shahriar Emami, Brian Gaucher, Abbie Mathew and Zhiguo Lai]
Company [Freescale Semiconductor Inc., IBM Research, Newlans Inc. and University of Massachusetts, Amherst]
Address
[Freescale Semiconductor, 6100 Broken Sound Pkwy., N.W. Suite 1, Boca Raton, FL  ]
[IBM Research, 1101 Kitchawan Road, Yorktown Heights, NY 10598]
[University of Massachusetts, Department of ECE, Amherst, MA ]
Abstract: [Summarizes 60 GHz channel modeling simulation work]
Purpose: [To update task group on channel modeling simulation work]
Notice: This document has been prepared to assist the IEEE P It is offered as a basis for discussion and is not binding on the contributing individual(s) or organization(s). The material in this document is subject to change in form and content after further study. The contributor(s) reserve(s) the right to add, amend or withdraw material contained herein.
Release: The contributor acknowledges and accepts that this contribution becomes the property of IEEE and may be made publicly available by P
S. Emami, Freescale
<author>, <company>

2. IBM Data office (432 PDPs) library/lab (117 PDPs)
September 2005
IBM Data
office (432 PDPs)
library/lab (117 PDPs)
private house (135 PDPs)
A number of PDPs (office and private homes) were not released.
First step is to reproduce IBM measurement and channel model.
S. Emami, Freescale

3. CDF of Delay Spread in Office Environment
September 2005
CDF of Delay Spread in Office Environment
S. Emami, Freescale

4. CDF of Delay Spread for Different Environments
September 2005
CDF of Delay Spread for Different Environments
S. Emami, Freescale

5. Average PDP in Office Environments
September 2005
Average PDP in Office Environments
S. Emami, Freescale

6. Total Path Loss in Office Environment
September 2005
Total Path Loss in Office Environment
S. Emami, Freescale

7. Path loss Parameters Zwick et al. 15.3c n 1.33 1.65 PLo (dB) -70
September 2005
Path loss Parameters
Zwick et al.
15.3c n
1.33
1.65
PLo (dB)
-70
-71.65
15.3c data base in 20% smaller
S. Emami, Freescale

8. Summary A subset of original IBM database was made available to us.
September 2005
Summary
A subset of original IBM database was made available to us.
Model parameters were extracted and compared to reported values.
There is a good match between PDPs and estimated RMS delay spreads.
Verified that IBM model is in fair agreement with their measurements.
S. Emami, Freescale