Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byBrook Flowers Modified over 6 years ago
1
HIV, viral hepatitis and sexually transmissible infections in Australia
Annual Surveillance Report 2017
2
HIV
3
Figure 1.1.1 New HIV diagnoses in Australia, 1984–2016, by sex
* Includes transgender people and people for whom data on sex was missing. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
4
Figure 1.1.2 New HIV diagnoses in Australia, 2007–2016, by age group
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
5
Figure 1.1.3 New HIV diagnoses, rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by sex
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
6
Figure 1.1.4 HIV notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
7
Figure 1.1.5 HIV notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, males
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
8
Figure 1.1.6 HIV notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, females
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
9
Figure New HIV diagnoses, notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
10
Figure New HIV diagnoses, notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
11
Figure Average age-standardised HIV notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (1/2) Note: Average HIV notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of HIV diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
12
Figure Average age-standardised HIV notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (2/2) Note: Average HIV notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of HIV diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
13
Figure 1.1.9 New HIV diagnoses, rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by region of birth
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
14
Figure 1.1.10 Number of new HIV diagnoses, 2007–2016, by exposure category
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
15
Figure New HIV diagnoses in men who reported male‑to‑male sex as an exposure risk, 2007– 2016, by region of birth Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
16
Figure Proportion of HIV diagnoses in non‑Australian‑born men with male‑to‑male sex as risk exposure, 2007–2016, by region of birth Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
17
Figure Number of new HIV diagnoses in men with exposure risk other than male‑to‑male sex, 2007–2016, by risk exposure category Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
18
Figure 1.1.14 Number of new HIV diagnoses in women, 2007–2016, by risk exposure category
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
19
Figure Newly diagnosed HIV notification rate per Australian‑born population, 2007–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
20
Figure Newly diagnosed HIV and HIV exposure category, 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
21
Figure Number of Australian‑born children perinatally exposed to HIV and proportion HIV‑positive, 1985–2016, by year of birth Source: Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit
22
Figure Proportion of Australian‑born perinatally exposed infants who were HIV‑positive, 2007–2016, by year of birth Source: Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit
23
Figure 1.1.19 Newly diagnosed HIV in Australia, 2007–2016, by newly acquired HIV status and year
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
24
Figure Newly acquired HIV notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
25
Figure Newly acquired HIV notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
26
Figure New HIV diagnoses classified as newly acquired or unspecified, 2007–2016, by HIV exposure category Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
27
Figure Number of new HIV diagnoses classified as newly acquired, 2007–2016, by exposure risk category Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
28
Figure Likely place of HIV acquisition in newly diagnosed HIV notifications in men who reported male‑to‑male sex as an exposure risk, 2014–2016, by country of birth Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
29
Figure Likely place of HIV acquisition in newly diagnosed HIV notifications in people who reported heterosexual sex as exposure risk, 2014–2016, by country of birth Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
30
Figure HIV subtype distribution in new HIV diagnoses in men who reported male‑to‑male sex as their exposure risk, 2015, by country of birth Source: State/Territory Health Authorities, NSW NHMRC Partnership Project
31
Figure HIV subtype distribution in newly diagnosed HIV notifications in people who reported heterosexual sex as exposure risk, 2015, by country of birth Source: State/Territory Health Authorities, NSW NHMRC Partnership Project
32
Figure 1.1.27 Proportion of late HIV diagnoses, 2007–2016, by selected exposure category
Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
33
Figure The proportion of late HIV diagnoses in men reporting an exposure category that included male-to-male sex, 2012–2016, by subcategory (n = 3289) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
34
Figure The proportion of late HIV diagnoses in males who reported heterosexual sex as an exposure risk, 2012–2016, by subcategory (n = 497) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
35
Figure The proportion of late HIV diagnoses in women who reported heterosexual sex as an exposure risk, 2012–2016, by subcategory (n = 386) Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
36
Figure HIV incidence rate per 100 person‑years in gay and bisexual men and female sex workers attending sexual health clinics, 2012–2016 Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
37
Figure Estimated proportion of people living with HIV who are undiagnosed, 2016, by demographic group and exposure Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates
38
Figure 1.3.2 Number and proportion of people living with HIV and diagnosed, 1986–2016
Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates.
39
Figure 1.3.3 Number and proportion of people living with HIV and diagnosed, 1986–2016, males
Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates
40
Figure 1.3.4 Number and proportion of people living with HIV and diagnosed, 1986–2016, females
Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates
41
Figure 1.3.5 Estimated HIV prevalence in selected countries, 2016
Source: UNAIDS; Countries included reflect number of Australian notifications by country of birth and key geographic and political countries in the Australian context
42
Figure Annual new HIV diagnoses as a proportion of the estimated number of people living with HIV and diagnosed, 2007–2016 Source: State and territory health authorities; see Methodology for detail on mathematical modelling for estimates of the number of people living with HIV
43
Figure Self‑reported HIV prevalence among gay men participating in the Gay Community Periodic Surveys, 2007–2016 Source: Gay Community Periodic Surveys
44
Figure HIV prevalence among people seen at needle and syringe programs, 2007–2016, by gender and sexual identity Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
45
Figure 1.4.1 The HIV diagnosis and care cascade, 2014–2016
Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates
46
Figure People living with HIV who have not achieved suppressed viral load by cascade stage, 2016 Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates.
47
Figure 1.4.3 The HIV diagnosis and care cascade, 2014–2016, males
Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates.
48
Figure 1.4.4 The HIV diagnosis and care cascade, 2014–2016, females
Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates.
49
Figure Proportion of non‑HIV‑positive gay and bisexual men tested for HIV in the 12 months prior to completing the survey, 2007–2016 Source: Gay Community Periodic Surveys
50
Figure Proportion of people who inject drugs attending needle and syringe programs who reported an HIV test in the past 12 months, 2007–2016, by sex Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
51
Figure Proportion of sexual health and high‑caseload general practice clinic attendees tested for HIV in a year, 2012–2016, by priority population Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
52
Figure 1.4.8 HIV retesting among gay and bisexual men attending sexual health clinics, 2012–2016
Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
53
Figure 1.4.9 Proportion of HIV‑positive men receiving antiretroviral treatment, 2007–2016
Source: Gay Community Periodic Surveys; ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance); see Methodology for detail.
54
Figure Proportion of patients with suppressed viral load from patients in the Australian HIV Observational Database, sexual health clinics and high‑caseload general practice clinics, 2007–2016 Source: Australian HIV Observational Database, ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
55
Figure Gay and bisexual men with casual partners who reported any condomless anal intercourse in the six months prior to the survey, 2007–2016 Source: Gay Community Periodic Survey
56
Figure Cumulative number of gay men enrolled in PrEP implementation programs in New South Wales, Queensland and Victoria, 2016, by month Source: EPIC‑NSW (New South Wales), QPrEPd (Queensland) and PrEPX (Victoria); see Methodology for detail.
57
Figure Proportion of non‑HIV‑positive gay and bisexual men in Gay Community Periodic Surveys who reported PrEP use in the past six months, 2013–2016 Source: Gay Community Periodic Surveys
58
Hepatitis C
59
Figure 2.1.1 Hepatitis C notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by sex
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
60
Figure 2.1.2 Hepatitis C notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
61
Figure 2.1.3 Hepatitis C notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, males
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
62
Figure 2.1.4 Hepatitis C notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, females
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
63
Figure Hepatitis C notification rate per population in people aged 25 years and under, 2007–2016, by sex Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
64
Figure Hepatitis C notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
65
Figure Hepatitis C notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
66
Figure Hepatitis C notification rate per population in people under 25 years of age, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
67
Figure Hepatitis C notification rate per population in people under 25 years of age, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
68
Figure 2.1.8 Hepatitis C notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by region of residence
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
69
Figure Average age-standardised hepatitis C notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (1/2) Note: Average hepatitis C notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of hepatitis C diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities.
70
Figure Average age-standardised hepatitis C notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (2/2) Note: Average hepatitis C notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of hepatitis C diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
71
Figure Hepatitis C notification rate per , 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year (Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia).
72
Figure Newly diagnosed hepatitis C notification rate per people, 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status and state/territory Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year (Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia).
73
Figure Newly acquired hepatitis C notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by age group Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
74
Figure Estimated annual incidence of hepatitis C among people who inject drugs seen at needle and syringe programs, 2007–2015 Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
75
Figure Estimated annual incidence of hepatitis C among people who inject drugs seen at Kirketon Road Centre Sydney, 2012–2016 Source: Kirketon Road Centre
76
Figure Estimated annual incidence of hepatitis C in a cohort of people who inject drugs in Melbourne, 2010–2016 Source: MIX: Melbourne injecting drug user cohort study
77
Figure Hepatitis C prevalence among survey respondents at needle and syringe programs, 2007–2016, by sex Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
78
Figure 2.1.17 Hepatitis C prevalence among prison entrants, by year
Source: National Prison Entrants’ Bloodborne Virus Survey 2004, 2007, 2010, 2013 and 2016
79
Figure Estimated number of people living with hepatitis C with severe fibrosis and hepatitis C‑related cirrhosis, 2007–2016 Note: Only includes people with chronic hepatitis C infection Source: See Methodology for detail.
80
Figure Estimated number of people with hepatitis C‑related severe fibrosis and cirrhosis, 2007–2016 Note: Only includes people with chronic hepatitis C infection Source: See Methodology for detail
81
Figure Estimated number of incident cases of hepatitis C‑related decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and deaths in people living with chronic hepatitis C, 2007–2016 Note: Only includes people with chronic hepatitis C infection Source: See Methodology for detail
82
Figure Estimated number of incident cases of hepatitis C‑related decompensated cirrhosis, hepatocellular carcinoma and deaths, 2007–2016 Note: Includes people with chronic hepatitis C infection and those who have been cured of infection but still experience hepatitis C‑related morbidity and mortality. Source: See Methodology for detail
83
Figure Number of hepatitis C‑related liver transplants and proportion of hepatitis C‑related transplants due to hepatocellular carcinoma, 2007–2016, by primary diagnosis Source: Australian and New Zealand liver Transplant Registry
84
Figure 2.1.23 The hepatitis C diagnosis and care cascade, 2016
75 909 32 550 30 434 Source: See Methodology for details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates
85
Figure Proportion of people who inject drugs seen at needle and syringe programs who reported a hepatitis C antibody test in the past 12 months, 2007–2016, by sex Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
86
Figure Proportion of people who inject drugs seen at needle and syringe programs who reported a hepatitis C antibody test in the past 12 months, 2007–2016, by hepatitis C antibody status Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
87
Figure The estimated number of people living with hepatitis C who received treatment, 1997–2016 Source: Pharmdash, pharmaceutical companies
88
Figure Number and proportion of people living with chronic hepatitis C at the start of 2016 who received treatment during 2016, by stage of disease Note: Stages F0–F2 early to moderate fibrosis; Stage F3 severe fibrosis; Stage F4 hepatitis‑C related cirrhosis. Source: See Methodology for detail.
89
Figure Proportion of hepatitis C antibody positive people seen at needle and syringe programs with a history of hepatitis C treatment, 2008–2016 Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
90
Figure Proportion of prison entrants who reported ever receiving hepatitis C treatment, by year of survey and sex Source: National Prison Entrants’ Bloodborne Virus Survey
91
Figure Proportion of people seen at needle and syringe programs reporting receptive syringe sharing in the past month, 2007–2016, by sex Source: Australian Needle and Syringe Program Survey
92
Hepatitis B
93
Figure 2.2.1 Hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000 population, 2006–2016, by sex
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
94
Figure 2.2.2 Hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
95
Figure 2.2.3 Hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, males
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
96
Figure 2.2.4 Hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, females
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
97
Figure Hepatitis B notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by year and state/territory (1/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
98
Figure Hepatitis B notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by year and state/territory (2/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
99
Figure 2.2.6 Hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by region of residence
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
100
Figure Average age-standardised hepatitis B notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (1/2) Note: Average hepatitis B notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of hepatitis B diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
101
Figure Average age-standardised hepatitis B notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (2/2) Note: Average hepatitis B notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of hepatitis B diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
102
Figure Hepatitis B notification rate per population, 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year (Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia).
103
Figure Hepatitis B notification rate per , 2012–2016, by state/territory and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year (Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, South Australia, Tasmania and Western Australia).
104
Figure 2.2.10 Newly acquired hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by sex
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
105
Figure 2.2.11 Newly acquired hepatitis B notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by age group
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
106
Figure Estimated prevalence of chronic hepatitis B infection in Australia and other countries, 2015 Source: Adjusted Australian antenatal prevalence data, international population seroprevalence data, WHO Collaborating Centre for Viral Hepatitis, Doherty Institute.
107
Figure 2.2.13 Chronic hepatitis B prevalence among prison entrants, by year of survey and sex
Source: National Prison Entrants’ Bloodborne Virus Survey.
108
Figure 2.2.14 The hepatitis B diagnosis and care cascade, 2014–2016
Note: Due to updated modelling methods, estimates may be different from figures presented in previous years of reporting. Source: WHO Collaborating Centre for Viral Hepatitis, Doherty Institute; see Methodology for detail.
109
Figure Proportion of people attending sexual health clinics who were susceptible to hepatitis B, 2016, by age group Note: ‘Susceptible’ is defined as susceptible to hepatitis B infection or lacking immunity to hepatitis B through vaccination or past exposure based on vaccination documentation or pathology results in patient records. The denominator excludes patients for whom hepatitis B vaccination documentation or pathology results were not available. Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance); see Methodology for details.
110
Figure Estimated number of people dispensed antiviral drugs for hepatitis B, 2013–2016, by drug type Note: Excludes tenofovir dispensing for HIV co‑infected patients. Patients on telbivudine are excluded; there were no more than 30 for most time periods. Source: Pharmaceutical Benefits Scheme 10% sample using Pharmdash. Excludes temporary residents who are ineligible for Medicare. See Methodology for detail.
111
Figure 2.2.17 Roll‑out of hepatitis B vaccination in Australia, by year
112
Figure Hepatitis B vaccination coverage estimates at 12 and 24 months, 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: National Centre for Immunisation Research and Surveillance of Vaccine Preventable Diseases; see Methodology for detail.
113
Sexually transmissible infections
114
Figure 3.1.1 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by sex
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
115
Figure 3.1.2 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by year and age group
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
116
Figure 3.1.3 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by year and age group, males
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
117
Figure 3.1.4 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by year and age group, females
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
118
Figure Chlamydia notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by year and state/territory (1/2) Note: Excludes Victoria in 2015 and 2016 as data were unavailable at the time of reporting, but will be available in the future. The Northern Territory is displayed on the right‑hand vertical axis. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
119
Figure Chlamydia notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by year and state/territory (2/2) Note: Excludes Victoria in 2015 and 2016 as data were unavailable at the time of reporting, but will be available in the future. The Northern Territory is displayed on the right‑hand vertical axis. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
120
Figure 3.1.6 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by region of residence
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
121
Figure 3.1.7 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by region of residence, males
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
122
Figure 3.1.8 Chlamydia notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by region of residence, females
Note: Excludes Victoria in all years, as 2015 and 2016 data were unavailable at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
123
Figure Average age-standardised chlamydia notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (1/2) Note: Average chlamydia notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of chlamydia diagnoses. Excludes Victoria as notifications data for 2015 and 2015 were not available at the time of reporting. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
124
Figure Average age-standardised chlamydia notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (2/2) Note: Average chlamydia notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of chlamydia diagnoses. Excludes Victoria as notifications data for 2015 and 2015 were not available at the time of reporting. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
125
Figure Chlamydia notification rate per , 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year (Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia and Western Australia).
126
Figure Chlamydia notification rate per , 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status and state/territory Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year (Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, and Western Australia).
127
Figure 3.1.12 Chlamydia incidence in sexual health clinic attendees, 2010–2016, by population
Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
128
Figure 3.1.13 The chlamydia diagnosis and care cascade in people aged 15–29 years, 2016, by sex
Source: See Methodology for further details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates.
129
Figure 3.1.14 Number of Medicare‑rebated chlamydia tests in Australia, 2008–2016, by sex
Source: Medicare
130
Figure Proportion of general practice attendees aged 15–29 years who had a Medicare‑rebated chlamydia test in a year, 2008–2016, by sex Source: Medicare
131
Figure Ratio of chlamydia notifications to Medicare‑rebated chlamydia tests, 2008–2016, by sex Source: Medicare; Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
132
Figure Ratio of chlamydia notifications to Medicare‑rebated chlamydia tests, 2008–2016, by age group, men Source: Medicare, Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
133
Figure Ratio of chlamydia notifications to Medicare‑rebated chlamydia tests, 2008–2016, by age group, women Source: Medicare, Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
134
Figure Proportion of clinic attendees tested for chlamydia in a year, 2012–2016, by clinic type and population Note: General practice clinics include primary healthcare general practice clinics with a high caseload of gay and bisexual men. Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance).
135
Figure Chlamydia retesting six weeks to six months following diagnosis at sexual health clinics, 2012–2016 Note: Includes diagnoses and testing at any anatomical site. Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance).
136
Figure 3.2.1 Gonorrhoea notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by sex
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
137
Figure 3.2.2 Gonorrhoea notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
138
Figure 3.2.3 Gonorrhoea notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by age group, males
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
139
Figure 3.2.4 Gonorrhoea notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016 by age group, females
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
140
Figure Gonorrhoea notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
141
Figure Gonorrhoea notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Note: The Northern Territory is displayed on the right‑hand vertical axis. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
142
Figure 3.2.6 Gonorrhoea notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by region of residence
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
143
Figure Gonorrhoea notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by region of residence, males Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
144
Figure Gonorrhoea notification rate per population, 2007–2016, by region of residence, females Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System.
145
Figure Average age-standardised gonorrhoea notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (1/2) Note: Average gonorrhoea notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of gonorrhoea diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
146
Figure Average age-standardised gonorrhoea notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (2/2) Note: Average gonorrhoea notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of gonorrhoea diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
147
Figure Gonorrhoea notification rate per population, 2012–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions (Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia and Tasmania) in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year.
148
Figure Gonorrhoea notification rate per population, 2012–2016, by state/territory and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes jurisdictions (Australian Capital Territory, Northern Territory, Queensland, South Australia, Victoria, Western Australia and Tasmania) in which Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year.
149
Figure 3.2.12 Gonorrhoea incidence in sexual health clinic attendees, 2010–2016, by population
Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance).
150
Figure 3.2.13 The gonorrhoea diagnosis and care cascade in gay and bisexual men, 2016
Source: See Methodology for further details of mathematical modelling used to generate estimates.
151
Figure Ratio of gonorrhoea notifications to Medicare‑rebated gonorrhoea tests, 2012–2016, by sex Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System; Medicare.
152
Figure Ratio of gonorrhoea notifications to Medicare‑rebated gonorrhoea tests, 2012–2016, by age group, males Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System; Medicare.
153
Figure Ratio of gonorrhoea notifications to Medicare‑rebated gonorrhoea tests, 2012–2016, by age group, females Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System; Medicare
154
Figure Proportion of clinic attendees tested for gonorrhoea in a year, 2012–2016, by clinic type and population Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
155
Figure Proportion of gonococcal isolates tested at the Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Programme with decreased susceptibility to ceftriaxone, 2010–2016, by state/territory Note: Decreased susceptibility was defined as having an MIC (minimum inhibitory concentration) between 0.06 and mg/L. Source: Australian Gonococcal Surveillance Programme
156
Figure 3.3.1 Infectious syphilis notification rate per 100 000 population, 2007–2016, by sex
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
157
Figure 3.3.2 Infectious syphilis notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by year and age group
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
158
Figure Infectious syphilis notification rate per , 2007–2016, by year and age group, males Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
159
Figure Infectious syphilis notification rate per , 2007–2016, by year and age group, females Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
160
Figure 3.3.5 Infectious syphilis notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2)
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
161
Figure 3.3.5 Infectious syphilis notification rate per 100 000, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2)
Note: The Northern Territory is displayed on the right‑hand vertical axis. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
162
Figure Infectious syphilis notifications per population, 2007–2016, by region of residence Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
163
Figure Average age-standardised infectious syphilis notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (1/2) Note: Average infectious syphilis notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of infectious syphilis diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
164
Figure Average age-standardised infectious syphilis notification rate per population, by statistical area level 3, 2014–2016, Australia and major cities (2/2) Note: Average infectious syphilis notification rates for the three-year period 2014–2016 were used to minimise the influence of fluctuation in the number of infectious syphilis diagnoses. Source: State and Territory Health Authorities
165
Figure Infectious syphilis notification rate per , 2012–2016, Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes all jurisdictions, as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year.
166
Figure Infectious syphilis notification rate per , 2011‑2015, state/territory and Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System. Includes all jurisdictions, as Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status was reported for ≥50% of diagnoses for each year.
167
Figure Infectious syphilis incidence in sexual health clinic attendees, 2010–2016, by population Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
168
Figure Congenital syphilis rate per live births, 2007–2016, by Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander status Note: 2016 rates were based on the number of live births in 2015, as 2016 births data were not available at the time of reporting. Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
169
Figure Proportion of clinic attendees tested for syphilis in a year, 2012–2016, by clinic type and population Note: General practice clinics include primary healthcare general practice clinics with a high‑caseload of gay and bisexual men. Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
170
Figure Average number of syphilis tests per year in gay and bisexual men, 2012–2016, by HIV status Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
171
Figure Gay and bisexual men reporting comprehensive STI testing in the 12 months prior to the survey, 2007–2016 Note: Comprehensive testing is defined as the collection of samples of at least four of the following: anal swab, throat swab, penile swab, urine, blood. Source: Gay Community Periodic Surveys
172
Figure Repeat comprehensive STI screen within 13 months of a test among gay and bisexual men attending sexual health clinics, 2012–2016, by HIV status Note: Repeat screening pertains to a retrospective 13‑month period. A comprehensive screen is defined as a test for chlamydia and gonorrhoea (any anatomical site), syphilis and HIV (among HIV‑negative gay and bisexual men). Source: ACCESS (Australian Collaboration for Coordinated Enhanced Sentinel Surveillance)
173
Figure Three‑dose HPV vaccination coverage for girls turning 15 years of age, 2007–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: National HPV Vaccination Program Register
174
Figure Three‑dose HPV vaccination coverage for girls turning 15 years of age, 2007–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Source: National HPV Vaccination Program Register
175
Figure Three‑dose HPV vaccination coverage for boys turning 15 years of age, 2013–2016, by state/territory (1/2) Source: National HPV Vaccination Program Register
176
Figure Three‑dose HPV vaccination coverage for boys turning 15 years of age, 2013–2016, by state/territory (2/2) Source: National HPV Vaccination Program Register
177
Figure Proportion of Australian‑born females diagnosed with genital warts at first visit at sexual health clinics, 2004–2016, by age group HPV vaccination for women launched Note: Excludes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females. Source: Genital Wart Surveillance Network
178
Figure Proportion of Australian‑born heterosexual males diagnosed with genital warts at first visit at sexual health clinics, 2004–2016, by age group HPV vaccination for men launched Note: Excludes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander males. Source: Genital Wart Surveillance Network
179
Figure Proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander females diagnosed with genital warts at first visit at sexual health clinics, 2004–2016, by age group HPV vaccination for women launched Source: Genital Wart Surveillance Network
180
Figure Proportion of Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander males diagnosed with genital warts at first visit at sexual health clinics, 2004–2016, by age group HPV vaccination for men launched Source: Genital Wart Surveillance Network
181
Figure Proportion of Australian‑born gay or bisexual men diagnosed with genital warts at first visit at sexual health clinics, 2004–2016 Note: Excludes Aboriginal and Torres Strait Islander men. Source: Genital Wart Surveillance Network
182
Figure Detection of high‑grade abnormalities in women undergoing cervical cancer screening (Pap screening), 2006–2015, by age group Source: Australian Institute of Health and Welfare, Cervical screening in Australia 2014–201538; see Methodological notes for details.
183
Figure 3.6.1 Donovanosis notifications, 2007–2016, by sex
Source: Australian National Notifiable Diseases Surveillance System
184
Surveillance Microsite
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.