1. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617

2. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Mole fraction of γ′ precipitates in Alloy 617 and Alloy 740 as a function of temperature

3. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at respective temperatures. (a) 593, (b) 649, (c) 704, (d) 760, and (e) 816 °C.

4. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
(a) Creep rupture data and (b) correlation between sulfur and boron concentration and rupture elongation for Alloy 617 at 760 °C

5. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 593–816 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter

6. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Second order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 using long-term creep rupture data above (a) 2000 hrs and (b) 5000 hrs

7. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 649–760 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter

8. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Logarithm of time to rupture versus reciprocal temperature lines for Alloy 617 at constant stresses, based on Fig. 9

9. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Larson–Miller constant C estimated from log tr versus reciprocal temperature plot for Alloy 617 and Alloy 740, together with constant C for Alloy 617 and Alloy 740 obtained by Swindeman program. The Cav = 18.5 shown by dotted line is average value of C = 17–20 obtained by log tr versus reciprocal temperature plot for Alloy 617 and Alloy 740.

10. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 740 at 600–850 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter

11. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Schematic illustration for obtaining constant C by linear extrapolation of log tr versus reciprocal temperature 1/T plots to 1/T = 0 at constant stresses, according to Eq. (1)

12. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Isothermal rupture curves and some horizontal lines showing constant stress conditions, together with creep rupture data for Alloy 617

13. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 593 °C–816 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter with (a) C = 18.45 and (b) C = 30

14. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
SEE for second order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 as a function of Larson–Miller constant C. The regression curves with C = 12.70, 18.45, and 30 are shown in Figs. 5 and 13.

15. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 with different data scattering of Δ = 0, 0.5 and 1 and second order regression curve of Larson–Miller parameter with C = 18.45

16. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
(a) SEE for second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 and (b) 100,000 hrs creep rupture strength at 700 °C, as a function of Larson–Miller constant C

17. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Stress versus Larson–Miller parameter plots of data with no scattering Δ = 0 and second-order regression curve of Larson–Miller parameter with C = 18.45

18. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
SEE for second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter for Alloy 617 as a function of Larson–Miller constant C

19. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Stress versus Larson–Miller parameter plots of test data Δ = 1 and second-order regression curve of Larson–Miller parameter with C = 18.45

20. Date of download: 12/15/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Influence of Data Scattering on Estimation of 100,000 hrs Creep Rupture Strength of Alloy 617 at 700 °C by Larson–Miller Method
J. Pressure Vessel Technol. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Creep rupture data for Alloy 617 at 593–816 °C and second-order regression curves of Larson–Miller parameter. The solid and dotted lines show regression curves for creep rupture data excluding and including shorter time to rupture data at 760 °C, respectively.