1. RQM 310: Pre-MDD Analysis June 8, 2015
LPD-17 San Antonio, SBIRS, F-35B, XM-25
June 8, 2015

2. Lesson Objectives
Examine analytical approaches that identify military capabilities, capability gaps, recommend non-materiel & materiel approaches, & recommend action
Examine military capability analytical approaches
Summarize the essential characteristics & qualities of Capability Based Assessments (CBAs)
Explore the relationship these approaches have to the DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation (DCR) & Initial Capabilities Document (ICD)

3. The Environment (Why Capability Analysis Matters…)

4. Our National Challenge
The United States must:
Prevail in current conflicts – and also:
Deter potential adversaries – yet continue to:
Prepare for future conflict – and:
Cooperate with allies and partners
U.S. Armed Forces must:
Address a wide range of challenges yet:
Recognize not all challenges have equal priority
The DoD Must:
Make difficult tradeoffs to manage risk in
Short-, Mid-, and Long-Term time frames but:
Identify areas of possible divestment
M1A1, Juliet GHOST prototype, Multinational Force

5. Our Military Challenge
CCMD Missions & Responsibilities
(Today)
Joint Systems
Changing Demands & Proactive Action
Geographic Specificity
Ambitious Mission Sets & Evolving Enemies
High Quantity
(Sufficiency)
Service Vision & Investment
(Tomorrow)
Service Missions
Shrinking Budgets & Unstable Funding
Worldwide Applicability
Achievable Acquisitions & Long-Lasting Systems
High Quality
(Capability)
CCMD: Combatant Command

6. Our Decision Support Challenge
Big “A” Acquisition
Resourcing (PPBE)
Unstable funding
Insufficient resourcing & trade
space
Poorly-phased budget unable to
support materiel development
Defense Acquisition
System
(DAS)
Requirements
(JCIDS)
Immature technologies
Incomplete systems engineering
Little requirements traceability
and rushed decomposition
Little-to-no schedule trade space
Reactive testing – not enough time
and assets
Poor capability & gap analysis
Poorly-written JCIDS documents
(ICD, CDD, CPD)
Top-down materiel solutions
Single point failures: critical dependence
on programs with acquisition problems
Non-existent inter- and intra-departmental
stakeholder coordination and support
Synchronize JCIDS, DAS, and PPBE to deliver capabilities to Warfighters
CDD: Capability Development Document
CPD: Capability Production Document
ICD: Initial Capabilities Document
JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight Council

7. Our Sourcing Challenge
Source: Globalsecurity.org, accessed Jan 22, 2014

8. Our Requirements Challenge
Gaming the system:
Specifying the solution too early
Misusing the Urgent/Emergent processes
Miscommunicating real warfighter needs:
Untrained workforces conducting inadequate capability analyses
Faulty translation, documentation, and traceability of capabilities & gaps into usable, observable, & testable requirements
“Good” leadership briefings that mask “Bad” JCIDS documents
Hindering acquisition programs:
Cost & schedule estimates derived from those very JCIDS documents
Confusing a “requirement” with a “specification”
Requirements creep - operational & technical
No follow-up on DAS reviews and T&E results

9. Fixing the delta between these three is why we’re here…
The Consequence
How the Warfighter explained it…
How the PM understood it…
Fixing the delta between these three is why we’re here…
How the Contractor designed it…
How the Programmer wrote it…
How the Tester received it…
How the Consultant explained it…
How it was documented…
How it was delivered…
How DoD was billed…
How the Loggie supported it…
What the Marketing Guru advertised…
Finally:
What the Warfighter actually needed…
Accessed Sep 14, 2013

10. Why Care About Up-Front Capability Analyses?
Life Cycle Cost (LCC) Determination*
% Impact of Materiel Decision on LCC
Are we buying the “proper” system?
(Capability Developer: Mission Effectiveness)
Are we buying, modifying, & disposing of that system “properly”?
(Materiel Developer: Acquisition Efficiency
100%
Approximately
95% of LCC determined here 80 60
% Actual
Funds
Spent 40 20
Approximately
10% of LCC Spent here 0%
EMD
MDD
MSA A
TMRR B C
P&D
O&S
Disposal
Control LCC Here:
“Sweet Spot”
Approximately
5% of reduction left here
LCC
Reduction Opportunities
*Notional curves:
Solid: averaged DAU, AFMC, & AMR Research Inc. data
Dashed: extrapolated “S” curve (sigmoid function) 10

11. The Process (Pre-MDD Capability Identification…)

12. Pre-MDD Analyses AoA review and Portfolio Assessment President SECDEF
Component Approved
Joint Concepts
President
SECDEF
CJCS
Joint
Community
Strategic Guidance
Disposal
CDR & CDR Assessment
PDR & PDR Assessment
Capabilities - Based Assessment
Technology Maturation & Risk Reduction
Engineering &
Manufacturing
Development
Production & Deployment
Operations & Support A
MDD
Draft
CDD
ICD B C
CPD
Materiel
Solution Analysis
Sustainment
CDD Validation
RFP Release
AoA
Report
AoA: Analysis of Alternatives
CDD: Capability Development Document
CPD: Capability Production Document
ICD: Initial Capabilities Document\
MDD: Materiel Development Decision

13. Solving Military Capability Gaps
Basically, three paths:
1. GFM: for assets available in Joint Force – basically adjusting what we currently have to where we need it…
2. DCR: When DoD needs an organic Joint Force non-materiel approach
3. ICD: when DoD needs both a materiel & non-materiel approach
Regardless of the path, solid analysis increases the odds… OR
DCR: DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation
GFM: Global Force Management
ICD: Initial Capabilities Document

14. GFM: Title 10 U.S.C.: Force Deployment Authorities*
Assignment:
The President, through the UCP documents his direction for assigning forces for Unified Commands (Title 10 U.S.C., Sections 161, 162, and 167)
Allocation:
By the authority of the SecDef, forces assigned to a combatant command may be transferred or allocated to another combatant commander for employment…under procedures prescribed by the SecDef and approved by the President (Title 10 U.S.C., Section 162)
Apportionment:
The CJCS is responsible for preparing strategic plans including projected resource levels…the CJCS apportions forces to combatant commands based on the SecDef’s contingency planning guidance (Title 10 U.S.C., Section 153)
The “Three A’s” of Global Force Management
*Source: EUCOM GFM Briefing, 3 Mar 2012

15. DoD Analytical Approaches to Identify Capabilities
CJCSI , Joint Lessons Learned Program
Reflects assessment of operational utility
May lead to further analyses (CBA trigger?) & development of JCIDS documents for staffing
Joint IED Defeat Transition Package
Used as a source document for the CDD & CPD - JROC approval & transition to program of record (POR)
JCTD – Joint Capability Technology Demonstration
Only after an assessment of operational utility
Outlined in Emerging Capability and Prototyping (EC&P) website:
Prototypes
Used to address JUONs & JEONs – also outlined in the EC&P website above:
(FITE)
(IED robot with Tanglefoot)
(JLTV)

16. DoD Capability Analysis Outputs
Regardless of the approach, these analyses ought to:
Describe the mission & military problem
Assess prior studies
ID the tasks needed to meet mission objectives
ID the capabilities using one or more JCAs - describe the tasks, conditions, standards
Assess the capability gaps – needed vs programmed force structure
Assess the operational risk for each capability gap if not addressed
First, exhaust all possible non-materiel approaches that could satisfy part of all of the capability gaps
Second, examine materiel approaches
Third, recommend the most appropriate approach to close the capability gaps and reduce operational risk
Fundamental goal: recommend action or accept risk
JCA: Joint Capability Area

17. The DoD CBA
The Capabilities-Based Assessment (CBA) is the “typical” JCIDS method to identify capabilities, gaps, & possible solution approaches:
Recapitalization, Replacement, & IS: CBA takes No Longer Than 90 days (NOT including writing & staffing times…)
More complex or new mission area: CBA takes No Longer Than 180 days (again, no writing & staffing times…)
No extensive detail or pre-determined solution
CBA: Capabilities-Base Assessment
IS: Information Systems

18. CBA Overview CBA: Initiated by: Becomes basis for:
Validating capability needs
DoD Sponsor
CBA:
Typical analytic basis of JCIDS
Based upon:
Recommends:
Joint
Concepts
Endorsed
CONOPS
Formally- tasked OPLANS and CONPLANs
ACTION w/o excessive rigor
ISCs
CONPLAN: Concept Plan
CONOPS: Concept of Operations
ISC: Integrated Security Constructs
OPLAN: Operation Plan

19. CBA Steps - May 2015 JCIDS Manual
Submit
Study
Initiation
Notice
Derive
CBA
Focus
Determine
Operational
Context
Identify Capability
Requirements &
Capability Gaps
Assess
Operational
Risk
Previous Studies, Lessons Learned, & other Analytical Products
Strategic Context, Missions, Scenarios, Joint Lessons Learned, DODAF Views
Timeframe, Threats, Concepts, & CONOPS, DODAF OV-5a
DoDAF OV-3, CV-2, CV-3,
CV-6, & OV-5a, SSA Products
Step 6
Step 7
Step 8
Needs Analysis
Identify Non-
Materiel
Approaches
Assess
Materiel
Approaches
Submit
Documentation & Recommendations
Gap Analysis
Wholly or Partially Mitigate Gaps
Evolutionary
Replacement/Recap
Transformational
Solutions Analysis

20. CBA to AoA & RM Skill Sets
ID tasks, conditions, & standards
“What’s the military problem”
MDD
ID capability gaps & redundancies
“Analyze the programmed force structure & doctrinal approaches”
CBA/ICD Sets up the AoA…
DCR
ID possible non-materiel & materiel solutions “Address gaps or accept risk”
Seam Between Capabilities & Acquisition
ICD
AoA
JCIDS
Acq
RM Skill Set = Capability Analysis
RM Skill Set =
Requirements
Development
Conduct of a DoD CBA

21. CBA Lit Search: Strategic Guidance
QDR
CRA
QDR
NSHS
Previous
Work
(AIR, J8
Repository)
NSS
NSS
NDS
NDS
NMS
NMS
ID tasks, conditions, & standards
“What’s the military problem”
UCP
DPG
ID capability gaps & redundancies
“Analyze the programmed force structure & doctrinal approaches”
JSCP
GEF
AIR: Acquisition Information Repository
CRA: Chairman’s Risk Assessment
QDR: Quadrennial Defense Review
NSS: National Security Strategy
NDS: National Defense Strategy
NMS: National Military Strategy
NSHS: National Strategy for Homeland Security
UCP: Unified Command Plan
GEF: Guidance on Employment of the Force
DPG: Defense Planning Guidance
JSCP: Joint Strategic Capabilities Plan

22. CBA Lit Search: Conceptual Guidance
Joint
Concepts
Legacy
Docs:
JOAC,
JOE,
JOC, JIC,
Etc…
CJCSI C
JCD&E*
J7 - JCCD
ID tasks, conditions, & standards
“What’s the military problem”
ID capability gaps & redundancies
“Analyze the programmed force structure & doctrinal approaches”
JCA
JCA
J7 Joint Concepts website (JEL+ is CAC-Enabled…) -
Joint Concepts Division “advances the operational effectiveness of the future joint force and enables the introduction of new capabilities by identifying military implications of the future operating environment, developing joint concepts and white papers, leading joint wargaming to evaluate concepts during development, and overseeing the joint concept development community of interest.”
JCCD: Joint Capabilities to Concept Division
JCD&E: Joint Concept Development & Experimentation
CCJO: Capstone Concept for Joint Operations
JIC: Joint Integrating Concept
JCA: Joint Capability Area
JOC: Joint Operating Concept
JOAC: Joint Operational Access Concept
JOE: Joint Operating Environment

23. Capability Mission Lattice (CML)
The “Capability Matrix Lattice” (CML) is an integrating construct to ensure traceability to strategic guidance, missions of the Joint force, and other departmental activities – both in the identification of capability requirements and their associated gaps, and in the review and assessment of capability requirement portfolios .
Strategic Guidance. Guidance from many sources influences military operations, intelligence activities, development and validation of capability requirements, acquisition activities, and DOTmLPF-P associated with organizing, training, and equipping forces. It also influences the budgetary process which provides funding for all of these activities.
Planning/Operations. Current and planned operations, as well as other roles, missions, and functions which direct an ability to perform certain activities, are the most direct driver of capability requirements, in the context of the strategic guidance and threats/intelligence. Global Context and Threats/Intelligence. Intelligence activities identify and quantify threats which may drive or impact military operations, and inform the setting of performance levels in capability requirements. The need to collect intelligence also drives capability requirements, often worked collaboratively between military and intelligence requirements processes when there are shared equities in the capabilities.
Materiel and Non-Materiel Capability Solutions. There is generally a many-to-many mapping between validated capability requirements and capability solutions, requiring both materiel and non-materiel solutions to address a single requirement. A single multifunction
system, with its associated DOTmLPF-P enablers, may also address many capability requirements across multiple capability requirement portfolios.
Capability Requirement Portfolio Management. FCB Chairs and other stakeholders must be advocates for changes to the capability requirement portfolio which are in the best interest of the joint force, and not necessarily advocate for every capability requirement proposed by Sponsors.

24. Requirements Decision Chain
JROC DECISION CHAIN
JROC MEMBERSHIP
JROC Chairman; Advises the CJCS
Chair: VCJCS
Statutory Members:
Vice Chief of Staff, Army
Vice Chief of Naval Operations
Vice Chief of Staff, Air Force
Assistant Commandant of the Marine Corps
Combatant Commands* (Commander or Deputy Commander)
VCJCS
JROC
Owns JCIDS; Validates JROC Interest documents; final authority
JROC
JCB
Validates JCB Interest documents; assists JROC
Reviews documents; prioritizes within portfolio; makes validation recommendation to JCB/JROC
FCB
FCB WG
Reviews documents & prioritizes prior to FCB review
JROC: Joint Requirements Oversight Council
JCB: Joint Capabilities Board
FCB: Functional Capabilities Board
FCB WG: FCB Working Group
CCMD reps highly encouraged to participate as voting members of the JROC. USD(AT&L), DCAPE, USD(Comptroller), DOT&E, and USD(Policy) are statutory JROC advisors

25. JROC Membership
Limit the audience so determinative discussion/ decisions can occur
More Tank-like
JROC Principals+1, CCMD Principals+1
Statutory Advisors (or Deputy - AT&L, CAPE, OT&E, OSD(P), OSD (C))
JS J7
FCB Chair
Minimal others - invitation only…

26. Functional Capability Boards
Battlespace
Awareness
Force
Support
C4/Cyber
Includes NC and
C2 JCAs
Logistics*
BGen
Weatherington
JS J-6
Mr. Canfield
JS J-2
Mr. Hawkins
JS J-4
MGen
Thomas
JS J-8
Protection**
BGen Bobeck
JS J-8
Force
Application
MGen
Thomas
JS J-8
Additional JCAs:
Building Partnerships
Corporate Management
& Support
The FCBs are boards below the JCB and provide review and assessment of documents and adjudication of lower level issues within their designated portfolios prior to review by the JCB, review/adjust Joint prioritization established by the FCB Working Groups (WGs), and perform other activities at the direction of the JCB or the JROC.
The FCBs are aligned with the joint capability areas (JCAs), which define portfolios of functionally similar capabilities within which each of the FCBs can focus their efforts.
*Ms Reardon, DASD for Supply Chain Integration, serves as Log FCB Co-Chair
**BGen Todorov, J8/DDJIAMDO, serves as Protection FCB Co-Chair for IAMD issues
FCB Membership: (O-6 level)
Services
CCMD Reps
OSD (AT&L)
OSD (I)
USecAF (Space)
DoD CIO
D/CAPE
DIA Rep (Threat)
ODNI/IRB
OSD (Comptroller)
Other DoD agencies as necessary

27. JCIDS Document Staffing (Joint Staff Only – NOT Service…)
Acquisition
(and/or DCRs)
Functional Capability
Board
SME inputs from DoD
Prioritization within this portfolio
CCMD Inputs
Allied/Partner Nation equity
Non-materiel recommendations
Gatekeeper
FCB Chair:
Ready Validation
Discussion?
Sponsor
JCB
JROC
Termination
Combined
“Staffing”
4 days
Est. 21 days Commenting/30 days Adjudication/7 days to FCB Chair
Est. 7 days to JCB/14 days to JROC
Total:
97 days
Theoretical ICD max (CBA start to JROC validation): 277 days

28. JCIDS Document Tracking
FCB
JROC
Interest
JROC*
JCB
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT I/IA programs & Joint DCRs
FCB
JCB
Interest
JCB
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT II & below - impact on interoperability
FCB
Sponsor
Joint
Integration
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT II & below - require endorsements & certs
FCB
Joint
Information
KM/DS staffing & comment
ACAT II & below - do not require endorsements & certs
* JROC may assert itself as the validation authority for any document of any assigned JSD at ANY time by directing JS J8 Gatekeeper to set the JSD to “JROC Interest”
Joint Staffing
Designator (JSD)
Staffing &
Prioritizing Body
Validation
Authority
KM/DS: Knowledge Management/Decision
Support tool

29. 1st CBA Recommendation: Non-Materiel Approaches
Doctrine
Organization
Training
Leadership
&
Education
Personnel
Facilities
DCR
Policy
DOTmLPF - P
Change
Recommendation
Doctrine: change how we fight
Organization: change how we’re organized to fight
Training: change how we train our DoD personnel
materiel: acquire what we already have in the field –
existing COTS, GOTS, or NDI
Leadership: adjust the joint leader’s professional development
Personnel: add or reassign people
Facilities: move or realign buildings & infrastructure
Policy: change policy that impacts how we fight

30. 2nd CBA Recommendation: Materiel Approaches
Development & Fielding of Information Systems
Or similar technologies with high obsolescence rates
Evolution of existing capabilities
Evolution of Existing Systems
Provide significant capability improvement
Replacing existing system with more capable system – could be NEW COTS, GOTS, or NDI
Simple recapitalization
Transformational Systems
Differ significantly in form, function, operation & capabilities
Significant improvement over current capability
Transforms how we accomplish mission

31. 2nd Recommendation: Materiel Approaches

32. Bottom Line: Pre-MDD Capability Analyses
AoA
These same results then support which acquisition analysis/document?
Sound Analysis & Recommendations: vital for shaping the force & the foundation of a successful acquisition
Materiel Solution Analysis (MSA) Phase
Usually starts & supports which
acquisition phase?
Materiel Development Decision (MDD)
Supports which acquisition decision?
DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation (DCR - First) or Initial Capabilities Document (ICD - Second)
Support which documents?
CBA Analysis & Recommendations

33. Sources for More Information
JCIDS Intellipedia Site:
Sign in, click Intellipedia link, put “JCIDS” into search box…
Current JCIDS guidance & errata, POCs, ICCR/DCMO JCIDS interaction, & many other useful documents & links
Defense Acq Mgmt Info Retrieval (DAMIR)
Acq Info Repository (AIR)
DASD/EC&P (Emerging Capability & Prototyping):
DAU online course CLR 250, Capability-Based Assessments:
DAU RM Community of Practice (RMCoP):
DTM site:

34. What does the JROC expect from Pre-MDD analyses?
Analytical depth
Specific recommendations
Analytical breadth
Action timetables
0 of 23

35. What’s the maximum time a CBA should take?
30 days
90 days
180 days
277 days
0 of 23

36. What recommendations can be submitted with a DCR?
Increasing manpower, operational tempo, spare parts, & fuel supplies
Recommend changing PME subjects or emphasis
Buying new commercial hardware
All of these choices are correct
0 of 23

37. Which of the following is not an ICD predecessor document or input?
Joint Concepts
Validated Threat Documents
AoA Study Report
Capabilities Based Assessments (CBAs)
All of these choices are correct
0 of 23

38. Which choice best represents the role of the CBA?
It maintains focus on developing specific solutions after sponsor initiation
It indirectly supports the ICD staffing process
It is analysis that underpins JCIDs
It directly supports the CDD staffing process
All answers are correct
0 of 23

39. CBAs identify all but which of the following:
Possible non-materiel approaches
Operational risks
Materiel support approaches
Shortfalls in existing systems
All answers are correct
0 of 23

40. Back Up

41. Changes to the Process (23 February 2015…)

42. 2015 Changes (1 of 2) Consolidated Guidance:
Cancel: CJCSI (Intelligence Certification), CJCSI (Net-Ready KPP), and JWSTAP Charter (Weapon Safety Endorsement)
Content absorbed into the three core documents:
CJCSI (JROC Charter), CJCSI (JCIDS), and the JCIDS Manual
Significant revision of Intelligence Certification content
Capability Analysis & Developing Requirements:
Use DODAF to improve development activities
Increase emphasis on attributes being measurable and testable
Refocus on using S&T to satisfy capability gaps (BBP 3.0…)
Introduces Additional Performance Parameters (APAs)
Introduce the Capability-Mission Lattice (CML) to improve requirements traceability to operational missions
DODAF: DOD Architecture Framework
JWSTAP: Joint Weapons Safety Technical Advisory Panel

43. 2015 Changes (2 of 2) Documents: Staffing: Portfolio Management:
Streamline formats
Extend “IT Box” construct to create IS CDD
Align affordability sections of ICD, CDD, & CPD with
Add Content/Endorsement guides for Mandatory KPPs, Weapon Safety endorsement, DOTmLPF-P endorsement, and Intelligence Certification
Staffing:
Integrate gatekeeping with DCMO for Defense Business Systems
Clarify guidance for submitting & reviewing higher classified documents & issues (including SAP, SAR, and ACCM)
Portfolio Management:
Consolidate “post-validation processes” and “prioritization” guidance into the “portfolio management” guidance.
ACCM: Alternative or Compensatory Control
Measures
SAP: Special Access Programs
SAR: Selected Acquisition Report

44. Changes to the Process (10 January 2012…)

45. JCIDS Changes (1 of 2) Requirements Training: Documents:
Mandated Requirements Management Certification Training (RMCT)
Documents:
Mandatory Page Limits: ICD (10), DCR (30), CDD (45), CPD (40)
Implemented “IT Box” construct: the IS ICD.
Post-Validation:
More definitive Tripwire Process: cost, schedule, & quantity changes
10% cost over current baseline or 25% original baseline, IOC/FOC slip of 12 months from initiating JROCM, 10% reduction in end items
DCR: DOTmLPF-P Change Recommendation
ICD: Initial Capabilities Document
CDD: Capability Development Document
CPD: Capability Production Document

46. JCIDS Changes (2 of 2) JCB/JROC Validation:
More Tank-like, with limited audience to facilitate determinative discussion
JROC Principals+1, COCOM Principals+1
Statutory advisors or their Deputy (AT&L, CAPE, OT&E, OSD(P), OSD(C), JS J7…)
Minimal others by invitation only…
FCB Chair briefs JCB/JROC, NOT the Sponsor or PM.
FCB Chair tees up the appropriate debate - Sponsor/SME available for discussion
Validation decision considers Cost, Schedule, Performance and Quantity Targets (as appropriate) in JROCMs

47. J8 Gatekeeper Perform an initial review of all requirements proposals
Support provided by J7, J6, J8, & FCB WGs
The Gatekeeper determines:
Joint Staffing Designator:
JROC Interest – potential ACAT I/IA
JCB Interest – potential ACAT II & below
Joint Integration – potential ACAT II & below, no joint force impact, no additional reviews necessary, staffing needed for applicable certs
Joint Information – potential ACAT II & below, may impact services or agencies but not joint force, no certs,
Lead and supporting FCBs
Formal staffing begins after Gatekeeper decisions

48. Sample JCA & Tiering
2 Battlespace Awareness – The ability to understand dispositions and intentions as well as the characteristics and conditions of the operational environment that bear on national and military decision-making. 2.1 Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance – The ability to conduct activities to meet the intelligence needs of national and military decision-makers Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Planning and Direction – The ability to synchronize and integrate the activities of collection, processing, exploitation, analysis and dissemination resources to meet information requirements of national and military decision-makers Define and Prioritize Intelligence, Surveillance and Reconnaissance Requirements – The ability to translate national through tactical objectives and needs into specific information and operational requirements for ISR. … 2.2 Environment – The ability to characterize and exploit the meteorological, space and oceanographic information from the sub-bottom of the earth’s oceans up to and including space.

49. DBS – Business Case Documents
Information Systems (IS) that are
NOT part of a weapon system
NOT directly involved in military or intel missions
Validated by DBSMC
Uses a business case document
Employs Business Capability Lifecycle (BCL) process in lieu of an ICD & CDD
Still uploaded to KM/DS
If joint oversight required, case document used for staffing & validation
Outlined in AT&L DTM, , Acquisition Policy for Defense Business Systems (DBS), 23 Jun 2011
Lesson Learned for all these approaches: good documentation vital when using these alternatives…
BCL: Business Capability Lifecycle
DBSMC: Defense Business Systems
Management Committee