Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:

Published byMolly O’Connor’ Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:"— Presentation transcript:

1 Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Figure 2: Changing American Attitude Categories
Figure 2: Changing American Attitude Categories. Mean membership in four attitude categories: support neither, support marijuana legalization only, support same-sex marriage legalization only, and support both. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

3 Figure 3: Changing American Attitude Categories by Age
Figure 3: Changing American Attitude Categories by Age. Mean membership in four attitude categories: support neither, support marijuana legalization only, support same-sex marriage legalization only, and support both. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

4 Figure 4: Changing American Attitude Categories by Gender
Figure 4: Changing American Attitude Categories by Gender. Mean membership in four attitude categories: support neither, support marijuana legalization only, support same-sex marriage legalization only, and support both. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

5 Figure 5: Changing American Attitude Categories by Political Party Affiliation. Mean membership in four attitude categories: support neither, support marijuana legalization only, support same-sex marriage legalization only, and support both. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

6 Figure 6: Average Marginal Effects of Sociodemographics on Attitude Categories with 95% Confidence Intervals. Estimates from a model predicting support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. Model includes the shown predictors and includes a series of binary controls for year. The figure displays the estimated average marginal effect of the sociodemographic factors on membership in the indicated attitude category. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

7 Figure 7: Average Marginal Effects of Ideological Factors on Attitude Categories with 95% Confidence Intervals. Estimates from a model predicting support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. Model includes the shown predictors and controls for year (a series of binary measures), sex, race, age, education, marital status, parenthood, and region and population size of home. The figure displays the estimated average marginal effect of the ideological factors on membership in the indicated attitude category. Bars represent 95% confidence intervals. N=4,079. Source: General Social Survey, 1988, 2006–2014. From: Should Mary and Jane Be Legal?Americans’ Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage Legalization, 1988–2014 Public Opin Q. 2016;81(1): doi: /poq/nfw050 Public Opin Q | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the American Association for Public Opinion Research. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

Download ppt "Figure 1: Changing American Attitudes toward Marijuana and Same-Sex Marriage. Mean support for marijuana and same-sex marriage legalization. N=4,079. Source:"

Similar presentations

From: An open day in the metric space

From: An open day in the metric space
Figure 4. The distribution of biology teacher main assignments

Figure 4. The distribution of biology teacher main assignments
Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency

Figure 1. Heat Map Summarizing Question Types by Agency
From: Wages and Human Capital in the U.S. Finance Industry: 1909–2006*

From: Wages and Human Capital in the U.S. Finance Industry: 1909–2006*
Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates

Figure 1 The spatial and temporal distribution of diarrhoea rates
From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*

From: Global Banking: Recent Developments and Insights from Research*
Figure 1. Estimated marginal mean (+/− SE) QSU-B factor 1 craving scores for the three-way interaction of Quitting Intention by Expect by Administered.

Figure 1. Estimated marginal mean (+/− SE) QSU-B factor 1 craving scores for the three-way interaction of Quitting Intention by Expect by Administered.
Additional controls: childhood family characteristics (parental income/education/occupation, mother's marital status at child’s birth, birth weight, gender).

Additional controls: childhood family characteristics (parental income/education/occupation, mother's marital status at child’s birth, birth weight, gender).
Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.

Figure 2 Effects of political reforms on tariff reduction and political approval rating. From: TPP negotiations and political economy reforms in Japan’s.
Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.

Fig. 3 Evolutionary game types as a function of relatedness and synergy where each plot is a different social group size. The payoffs used to generate.
Figure 1. The annual cycle of the migratory monarch butterfly occurs in four main stages: (1) overwintering, (2) spring migration and breeding, (3) summer.

Figure 1. The annual cycle of the migratory monarch butterfly occurs in four main stages: (1) overwintering, (2) spring migration and breeding, (3) summer.
Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.

Figure 1. Period–cohort diagram.
From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution

From: Political Leadership and Power Redistribution
Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.

Figure 1. The Modified Dual Pathway Model.
Note: Vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals

Note: Vertical lines are 95% confidence intervals
Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.

Figure 1. Structural Equation Model: Effects of Valence Framing on Perceived Truth of Statements and Source Trustworthiness. Standardized path-coefficients.
Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.

Test characteristics of MRI-detected inflammation for the development of arthritis in CSA patients (A) and RA in UA patients (B) during 1-year follow-up.
Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.

Table 5 Village Characteristics Based on the Census of India 1991, by Mandate during which a First SHG was Created in the Village From: Public Good Provision.
Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.

Figure 1. Programme provisions, eligibility, evaluation period and geographical coverage of programme over time From: Impact evaluation of free delivery.
Figure 4. Sensitivity of illustrative simulated cumulative US deaths to cigarettes per day (CPD) reduction and to Excess Risk transition rates. See text.

Figure 4. Sensitivity of illustrative simulated cumulative US deaths to cigarettes per day (CPD) reduction and to Excess Risk transition rates. See text.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google