Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
CT5806701 Reinforced Earth Structures
Design of Reinforced Soil Slopes National Taiwan University of Science and Technology Department of Construction Engineering Professor Kuo-Hsin Yang
2
Design Step of Reinforced Soil Slopes
Site investigation Lab tests Establish project requirements Determine engineering properties of in-situ soils Determine engineering properties of reinforced fill Establish reinforcement design parameters Check unreinforced slope stability Preliminary reinforced soil slope design (design reinforcement layout and length by design charts) Check reinforced slope internal stability Check external stability Check seismic stability Detail design (auxiliary components) Prepare plans and specifications Stability analysis Detail design
3
Limit Equilibrium Analysis of RSS
Advantages Many experiences by practitioners Simple input data and easy to use Able to deal with pore water pressure and complex geometry Useful (but limited) design information Modeling of reinforcement is capable
4
Limit Equilibrium Analysis of RSS
Disadvantages Unable to deal with displacements FEM Compatibility (Stress-Strain Relation) Limited representation of interaction between dissimilar materials Selection of material properties and safety factors based on state of practice insures acceptable performance
5
Design Objective For the given geometry, surcharge soil properties
desired minimum factors of safety, find the required strength and layout of reinforcement to satisfy required stabilities (FSs).
6
Failure Modes Internal: cut thru all reinforcement layers Compound
External: Not cut thru any reinforcement layer
7
External Failure Modes
8
Limit Equilibrium Analysis
Design Procedure of Limit Equilibrium Analysis
9
Establish Project Requirements And Determine Soil Properties
Surcharge Design for reinforcement Tult, L, Sv GWT or pore water pressure Retained soil Properties Height Seismic Acceleration Reinforced soil Properties Slope angle Foundation soil Properties GTW
10
Required Factor of Safety
Internal Slope Stability: Breakage: FS≥1.3 Pullout: FS≥1.5 (sand) FS≥2.0 (clay) Compound Stability: FS≥1.3 External Stability: Sliding: FS≥1.3 Global (Deep Seated): FS≥1.3 Bearing Capacity: FS≥1.3 Seismic Stability: FS≥1.1
11
Establish Reinforcement Design Parameters
Determine reinforcement ultimate tensile strength and reduction factors Tult, RFc, RFD, RFID from Laboratory tests
12
Check Unreinforced Slope Stability
tf Use limit equilibrium program L is length of failure surface
13
Preliminary Reinforced Slope Design
Determine Required Reinforcement Force Mobilized soil friction angle STs=nTs Equivalent height Schmertman (son) Chart (1987) Schmertmann, G. R., Chouery-Curtis, V.E. Johnson, R.D., and Bonapart R. (1987), “Design Charts for Geogrid-Reinforced Soil Slopes”, Proc., Geosynthetics’ 87 Conf., New Orleans, La.,
14
Preliminary Reinforced Slope Design
Determine Required Reinforcement Force Mobilized Slope angle Leshchinsky and Boedeker Chart (1989)-log spiral Leshchinsky, D. and Boedeker, R.H., (1989) “Geosynthetic Reinforced Soil Structures”, Journal of Geotechnical Engineering, ASCE, Vol. 115, No. 10, pp
15
Preliminary Reinforced Slope Design
Determine Required Reinforcement Force Developed=Mobilized Jewell (1991) Jewell, R. A., (1991) “Application of Revised Design Charts for Steep Reinforced Slopes”, Geotextiles and Geomembranes, Vol. 10, No. 3, pp
16
Preliminary Reinforced Slope Design
Determine Reinforcement Length LT: Top Length LB: Bottom Length Schmertman Chart (1987)
17
Determine Distribution of
Reinforcement Forces H≤6m1 zone ; H>6m2 or 3 zone For 3 zone Ttop=1/6Ts-max Tmiddle=1/3Ts-max Tbottom=1/2Ts-max For 2 zone Ttop=1/4Ts-max Tbottom=3/4Ts-max
18
Determine Reinforcement Force
For each zone Required Reinforcement Force for Required FS
19
Check Reinforced Slope Internal Stability
Assume tangent: reinforcement can kink at failure Assume horizontal Use limit equilibrium program Reinforcement loads increase to slope stability
20
Check Reinforced Slope Internal Stability
Method A: Moment from reinforcement is used to reduce driving moment FSR is only applied to soil
21
Check Reinforced Slope Internal Stability
Method B: Moment from reinforcement is added to resisting moment FSR is applied to soil and reinforcement
22
Check Reinforced Slope Internal Stability
Method A: FS =2.91 Method B: FS =1.72
23
Check Reinforced Slope Internal Stability
24
Check Reinforced Slope Internal Stability
25
Check FS against Pullout
Le>1m Use the critical failure surface from limit equilibrium analysis to determine reinforcement embedment length Le
26
Check Reinforced Slope External Stability
Set a thin interface layer and input interface properties in limit equilibrium analysis. Check sliding for each layer (fix the location of failure surface) 3, FSsliding=1.3 Check global and compound by free searching FS=1.3
27
Check Reinforced Slope Seismic Stability
Perform Seismic Limit Equilibrium Analyses Allow Structural Deformation Kh=0.5A Fsdynamic=1.1 very conservative
28
Primary and Secondary Reinforcement
Detail Design Primary and Secondary Reinforcement
29
Primary and Secondary Reinforcement
Detail Design Drainage System Primary and Secondary Reinforcement
30
Case Example
31
Case Example Statement
A highway widening project requires the design of a 8m high geogrid-reinforced slope. The slope and backfill information are provided as follows. Conduct a preliminary design using the design charts proposed by Schmertmann et al. (1987). Design the reinforcement force and length to satisfy the required FS for internal stability. Reinforced Soil Slope: H=8 m, b=45o, q=100kPa, Sv=0.5m Backfill: Use sand g= 18 kN/m3, f=35o 31
32
Determine Required Reinforcement Force
Check Chart 0.13
33
Determine Reinforcement Forces
H>6m2 or 3 zone Ttop=1/4Ts-max=41 kN/m Tbottom=3/4Ts-max=123 kN/m For each layer
34
Determine Reinforcement Length
LT/H’=0.4 LT=0.4*13.5=5.4m LB/H=0.55 LB=0.55*13.5=7.4m LB LT
35
Limit Equilibrium Program-ReSSA
36
Slope Configuration and Surcharge
37
Reinforcement
38
Soil
39
Critical Failure Surface
Factor of Safety and Critical Failure Surface Increase the LT for improve pullout resistance
40
FS Contour
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.