Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

The Federal R&D Budget, Part 2: The Congressional Process

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "The Federal R&D Budget, Part 2: The Congressional Process"— Presentation transcript:

1 The Federal R&D Budget, Part 2: The Congressional Process
Matt Hourihan September 8, 2017 For the AAAS S&T Policy Fellows AAAS R&D Budget and Policy Program

2 Congress in the Federal Budget Cycle
Congress has the Power of the Purse U.S. Constitution, Article I, Section 9: “No Money shall be drawn from the Treasury, but in Consequence of Appropriations made by Law; and a regular Statement and Account of the Receipts and Expenditures of all public Money shall be published from time to time.”

3 Natural Resources Cmte
House Budget Cmte Natural Resources Cmte Approps Cmte Subc on Interior + Env Subc on Energy + Water Energy + Commerce Cmte Senate Energy and Nat Res Cmte Env and Pub Works Cmte And many others… Also revenue (tax) committees (House Ways and Means, Senate Finance)

4 Natural Resources Cmte
House Budget Cmte Natural Resources Cmte Approps Cmte Subc on Interior + Env Subc on Energy + Water Energy + Commerce Cmte Senate Energy and Nat Res Cmte Env and Pub Works Cmte Budget Committees

5 The Budget Resolution Established by 1974 Congressional Budget Act
Overall framework and statement of priorities Discretionary spending Also revenue, deficit, and total spending targets Also non-binding recommendations from majority/leadership Isn’t law and can’t change law, but can set up reconciliation instructions This year, for tax reform The budget resolution is a political document (and therefore, often not passed!)

6

7 Two Spending Categories: Discretionary vs. Mandatory
Mandatory Spending (aka Direct Spending) Mostly entitlements, mostly on “autopilot” Potential for high political sensitivity = “third rail” New spending requires new legislation from the authorizing committees Discretionary Spending: Adjusted annually through appropriations bills via the appropriations committees Easy (nondefense) targets? i.e. Sequestration Vast majority of federal R&D is discretionary

8

9

10

11

12

13

14

15

16 Natural Resources Cmte
House Budget Cmte Natural Resources Cmte Approps Cmte Subc on Interior + Env Subc on Energy + Water Energy + Commerce Cmte Senate Energy and Nat Res Cmte Env and Pub Works Cmte Appropriations Committees

17 From Budget to Appropriations Committees
Budget Resolution limits  Approps Committees  Subcommittees [302(b) allocations] These caps remain in place all the way to floor, but can be revised as needed Twelve Appropriations Subcommittees Eight responsible for >$1 billion of R&D Led by “Cardinals” Committee Chairs: Rep. Rodney Frelinghuysen (NJ), Sen. Thad Cochran (MS) Ranking Members: Rep. Nita Lowey (NY), Sen. Patrick Leahy (VT) Appropriators will have their own priorities All politics is local “President proposes, Congress disposes” One challenge for cardinals: balancing priorities to get a bill that can pass

18 Energy & Water ~$40 billion
House Senate Chair Mike Simpson (ID) Lamar Alexander (TN) Ranking Member Marcy Kaptur (OH) Dianne Feinstein (CA) ~$40 billion Tradeoffs: Balancing basic research and facilities, national labs, DOE technology portfolio, NNSA; also Army Corps, Bureau of Reclamation Partisan debates over energy technologies (renewables vs. nuclear vs. fossil) Basic vs. applied? Climate research?

19 Commerce, Justice, Science
House Senate Chair John Culberson (TX) Richard Shelby (AL) Ranking Member Jose Serrano (NY) Jeanne Shaheen (NH) ~$55 billion Tradeoffs: Balancing Depts. of Justice and Commerce, NASA, NSF NSF: social and geo science funding? Facilities? NASA: planetary exploration, climate research, human spaceflight (and where do we fly?) Commerce: NOAA climate research and NIST industrial technology programs controversial

20 Defense House Senate Chair Kay Granger (TX) Thad Cochran (MS) Ranking Member Pete Visclosky (IN) Dick Durbin (IL) Over $600 billion Tradeoffs: balancing force modernization, readiness, personnel costs, RDT&E War funding

21 Appropriations Process
Budget Resolution Limits  Appropriations Committees  Subcommittees [302(b) allocations] These caps are always in place throughout the process, but can be revised as needed Information gathering: Hearings with agency testimony “Views and estimates” from other authorizing committees Projections from CBO Behind-the-scenes agency contact Constituents, experts, lobbyists Subcommittee  Committee  Floor Bills AND reports Can be amended throughout Subject to 302(b) caps Bills have to pass both chambers Can be filibustered or vetoed Differences are negotiated/resolved in conference committee

22 Other Legislative Appropriations Tools
Continuing Resolutions …with depressing regularity Uncertainty? New starts? Omnibus Or minibus, or megabus, or cromnibus, or… Supplementals i.e. Zika, Ebola, Hurricanes Also war funding Not subject to spending caps

23 Natural Resources Cmte
House Budget Cmte Natural Resources Cmte Approps Cmte Subc on Interior + Env Subc on Energy + Water Energy + Commerce Cmte Senate Energy and Nat Res Cmte Env and Pub Works Cmte Authorizing Committees

24 Authorizations vs. Appropriations
Creates and modifies programs and policies Sets funding ceilings Can provide mandatory spending Appropriations Provides funding to discretionary programs Appropriating federal dollars is basically a two-step process First authorization, then appropriation However: unauthorized appropriations (and unfunded authorizations) are ever-present Mandatory or direct spending only requires the first step

25 Mandatory Spending: An Alternate Path for R&D?
Two current examples: Diabetes Research (NIH) Biomass R&D Program (USDA) Recent Proposals: FY 2017 budget request 21st Century Cures, originally Potential challenges: Shifting power away from appropriators Can make it harder for Congress to intervene PAYGO rules Potential advantages: Stability?

26 The Federal Budget Cycle
Gov’t is usually working on 3 budgets at any given time (However, presidential transitions complicate things)

27 Looking Ahead FY18 spending caps: Where do we end up?
House to vote on budget resolution in September? But… Will need to work with Democrats on any deal to change the caps FY18 appropriations: House to finish omnibus this week? Senate a bit further behind Very mixed year CR likely What does White House think? Debt ceiling? Tax reform? FY19: Guidance memo issued

28

29 For more info…


Download ppt "The Federal R&D Budget, Part 2: The Congressional Process"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google