1. Damien Tan Andreas Toh Roy Chia Tavence Heng
DART Jetpack
Damien Tan
Andreas Toh
Roy Chia
Tavence Heng

2. Introduction
The DART Jetpack project was started by 4 engineers in 2010.
They wanted to merge business with engineering in their venture by trying to market their jetpack using skills learnt from Project Management.

3. Project Objectives
Improve convenience in human lives
Military usage

4. Scope of Project
Estimated duration Research (3mnths) Brainstorm (1Month) Planning/blueprint stage (2months) Miniature Model (1month) Trouble shooting (1month) Prototype stage (2years)

5. Scope of Project
Estimated cost Planning stages $ Prototype stage $1000

6. Responsibility matrix
Responsibility matrix Project leader  Damien Designer  Andreas Accountant  Roy Scheduler  Tavence

7. Current Issues Choose which way to start the jetpack - Fan
- Chemical Reactions
- Hydro
Logistical problem
Budget constraint
Technological problems/inability
Safety issue
Jetpack stabiliser problems
Human testing

8. Manpower requirements
Overall In-charge
Researcher
Planner
Operational In-charge
Marketer
Sales person
Technician
Logistics In-charge
Production In-charge
Safety In-charge

9. research

10. Work Breakdown Structure

11. Mindmap of Dart Jetpack

12. Dart’s Work breakdown structure

13. Cost Analysis Resources, $1,240,305.00
Human Resource, Manpower, $ 165,000.00
Marketing , $ ,600.00
A.O.M, insurance, $ 110,000.00
Total Budget $ 1,565,905.00

14. Assumptions Number of workers 100 Price per jetpack $5,000
Life time company insurance
Hiring of Public Relations Staff in media coverage
Jetpacks sold per month 500
Amount of jetpacks made per month 500
Material cost per jetpack $2,000
The budget cost is per monthly basis sell to retailer to sell to public 10% contingency
Total Income $ ,500,000.00
ROI 60%

15. Project Scheduling Scheduling the Project Time
Microsoft Office Project
Listing the tasks
Placing them according to tasks and sub tasks
Placing them according to prerequisites
Inserting the estimated Time for the tasks
Generate the Gantt chart

16. AON Activity-On-Node (AON) Easier to see the Time allocation
Easier to see the Predecessors.

17. AON
Earliest Start Time (EST) : the early start of a project
Duration : how long will this project completes
Earliest Finish Time (EFT): EST + duration
Latest Start Time (LST) : the latest time a project can start
Latest Finish Time (LFT) = LST + duration
Total Float = LFT – EST – duration 2 1 3
Create Prototype 6 4 7

18. OUR AON -It took us 153 days to for the production of jetpacks
-Our assumption is 180days
-Creation of prototype is the only predecessor
for cost analysis and test of prototype 5
Rental of Factory
Assumption
180 days 14 19
Install utilities 30 49
Renovation 7 56
Install Machinery 61
Recuriting of worker 91
Research 10
101
Design 8
109
Create Prototype
116
Test Prototype
Cost analysis 6
122 9
Purchase Raw Material 21
143
Mass Production
148
Quality Check
153
Delivery 27
180

19. Probability (1=low, 5=high)
Risk Assessment
s/n
Risk Description
Probability (1=low, 5=high)
Impact (1=low, 5=high)
Ranking 1
Unable to locate factory site 5 7 2
Unable to find contractors 6 3
Delay in renovations 13 4
Faulty machinery during installation
Unable to find skilled workers 14
Office worker demand more pay 22
security companies charges too high 23 8
Unable to find proper accomodations for production crew 24 9
Unable to hire qualified quality check crew 10
R and D crew demand too high a pay 11
Lack of technical knowledge 12
Inappropiate design 15
Not enough raw materials for prototype 16
Prototype malfunction
Delay in shipments of raw materials 17
Unable to find supplier for raw material 19
Not enough raw materials for mass production 25 18
Lack of appropiate supervision while mass production stage
Machinery malfunction during mass production 20
Production halted due to safety issues 21
Unable to meet quality check expectations
Over budget
Delay in delivery
Unable to find repair crew
Insufficient funds to pay for warranty

20. Top 5 risks -Machinery malfunction during mass production
-Faulty machinery during installation
-Unable to meet quality check expectations
-Production halted due to safety issues
-Prototype malfunction
Rank
Top 5 risks
Probability (1=low, 5=high)
Impact (1=low, 5=high) 1
Machinery malfunction during mass production 5 4 2
Production halted due to safety issues 3
Faulty machinery during installation
Unable to meet quality check expectations
Prototype malfunction
Risks
How probability can be reduced
How impact can be reduced
Perform frequent maintainence and checks
Multiple production lines
Implement stringent rules for workers to abide
Stock up on products
Getiing a reliable supplier
Request for earlier delivery time
Enforce quality standards for quality standard
Increase the quality standards for the quality checks
Thorough analysis of failures
Have a backup team doing a prototype

21. Creation of prototype
Video 1-fail launch
Video 2-disintegrated rocket

22. Conclusion Gained valuable experience Know how to manage a project
Hope to make this a reality

23. THE END
THANK YOU