Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

BES Equitable and Sustainable Well-being in Italy

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "BES Equitable and Sustainable Well-being in Italy"— Presentation transcript:

1 BES Equitable and Sustainable Well-being in Italy
Tommaso Rondinella, Istat EMOS course, University of Pisa 9th November 2016

2 Development and Well-being
GDP growth = Economic performance Development and Well-being

3 Development and Well-being
GDP growth Economic performance Development and Well-being

4 GDP and economic performance
Major GDP limitations Does not reflect income distribution Does not include important parts of economic activity (housework, informal sectors, volunteering) Does not take into account «negative externalities» Includes defensive expenditures Underestimates the value of public services

5 GDP and economic performance
Net disposable income as percentage of GDP for USA, France and Ireland source: OECD, Annual National Accounts

6 GDP and economic performance
Real income per capita in France compared to the United States, 2005 (Unites States = 100) Including housework and leisure Including public services Unadjusted disposable household income. GDP Including housework

7 GDP and well-being Esterlin paradox Climate change

8 Recent developments 2004 – Palermo – OECD World Forum on Key Indicators. Statistics, Knowledge and Policy. 2006 – Istanbul Declaration + Global Project on measuring the progress of societies. 2007 – WWF, Club of Rome, EP – Beyond GDP (Barroso: “It’s time to go beyond GDP”). 2008 – Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi Commission. 2009 – European Commission – COM “GDP and Beyond”. 2010 – Europe 2020 2011 – DGINS – Sofia Memorandum 2011- OECD Better Life Initiative. “How’s Life” 2011 – Eurostat –Sponsorship Group on Measuring Progress, Well-being and Sustainable Development. 2013 – First BES Report 2015 – 2030 Agenda and SDGs

9 EC COM “GDP and Beyond” It identifies five key actions for the short and medium term: 1: Complement GDP with environmental and social indicators (a comprehensive environmental index, quality of life and well-being). 2: Provide near real-time information for decision-making (more timely environmental and social indicators). 3: Report more accurately on distribution and inequalities 4: Develop a European sustainable development scoreboard (coordinated by Directorate General for Environment (DG ENV). 5: Extend national accounts to environmental and social issues

10 ESS Sponsorship group objectives
National accounts data on household income and consumption distribution of households income, consumption and wealth non-market domestic activities and leisure time developing EU-SILC as the core instrument for measuring the quality of life, incl. through incorporating further topics and subjective questions establish an expert group on quality of life reinforcing environmental and economic accounts on energy, climate change and material consumption deriving so called "footprint indicators" from national accounts developing environmental accounts relating to goods and services, environmental protection expenditure and natural assets developing landscape and biodiversity indicators improving data of water and waste

11 BES

12 “What we measure affects what we do” Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi report
Measures and action Wellbeing is a multidimensional concept which changes according to time, places and cultures. The identification of dimensions and indicators to measure such a concept is always an exercise that reflects norms, values and priorities of those who participate in the selection process “What we measure affects what we do” Stiglitz-Sen-Fitoussi report

13 A shared approach: deliberation and legitimacy
Statistical information, in order to be followed by political action, needs to have a certain degree of legitimacy. A legitimate decision does not represent everyone’s will, but stems from everyone’s deliberation. Manin 1987 The choice of the phenomena to monitor coincides with the selection of policy priorities. In Italy we adopted a complex approach to share all decision at every steps not only with the experts but with the civil society at large.

14 The Istat-Cnel initiative
Steering Committee: with the participation of 33 stakeholders (CNEL representatives, NGO networks, women / consumers / environmental organizations) and Istat experts, to identify the domains and to agree on the final list of indicators Scientific Commission: with the participation of 80 experts in different fields, to select indicators for each domain. Public consultation: National survey Online survey Blog Regional meetings

15 BES: a complex approach
Annual survey on what is important for wellbeing (24k households) 12 Dimensions Steering Committee Online survey (2500 people) and Blog Scientific commission Discussion Meetings in every region and Blog 134 Indicators Final report

16 What is important for your well-being?
Score from 0 to 10 given to wellbeing dimensions – Year 2011 Mean % of 10 Being in good health 9,7 79,9 Guarantee the future of you children socially and economically 9,3 66,1 Have a decent work of which being satisfied 9,2 59,5 Have an adequate income 9,1 56,0 Good relationships with friends and relatives 53,2 Be happy in love 9,0 53,6 Feeling safe with respect to criminality 56,3 Good education 8,9 48,8 Present and future environmental conditions 48,3 Live in a society in which you can trust others Good governance 8,8 46,6 Services accessible and of good quality 8,7 43,9 Adequate free time and of good quality 8,5 37,4 Be able to influence local and national policies 7,8 30,6 Participation to community life 7,1 18,7

17 Key domains for the Italian BES

18 Results of the online consultation
Level of importance of the 12 domains

19 Health conditions Mortality Behaviors

20 Formal education Competences

21 Quality Life balance

22 Poverty and consumption
Income and wealth Poverty and consumption

23 Social economy

24 Trust Equal opportunity

25 Criminality Violence Perception

26

27 Rural landscape Urban landscape Perception

28 Quality Biodiversity Global issues

29 Production Use

30 Social services Utilities Mobility

31 BES2015: composite indicators
2010 2011 2012 2013 2014

32 Territorial projects Brescia Verona Parma R.Emilia Forlì Cesena Prato
Livorno Prato Perugia Terni Pesaro Potenza Catanzaro Catania

33 BES indicators included in the National Reform Program (Stability law)
Current challenges BES indicators included in the National Reform Program (Stability law) Adoption of 2030 Agenda

34 Well-being indicators in the Budget law
The new Italian Budget Law (8/2016) establishes that: public policies are regularly monitored and evaluated also through the effects on well-being indicators a high level committee is set up to propose a selection of well-being indicators. It includes the Minister of Economy and Finance, the President of Istat, the Governor of the Bank of Italy and 2 recognized experts the proposal is then approved by the Parliament and becomes effective

35 130 12 Sensitivity to public policies Parsimony Practicability
Selection criteria 130 Sensitivity to public policies Parsimony Practicability Timeliness, extension and frequency of time series Transparency and accountability 12 Selected indicators should be sensitive to economic policies, possibly within the three-year period of the economic planning. Obviously, the choice of indicators on the basis of the major, or less, sensitivity to regulatory intervention must be matched with the opportunity to include key variables related to long-term well-being, with slower evolution. Parsimony. A large number of indicators better capture the complexity of the different domains, but makes the policy evaluation too complex. It is important focus on a limited number of indicators also to facilitates the cultural transition from a public debate centered almost exclusively on GDP and other production-related indicators to a more complex picture of development. And to ensure that the inclusion of welfare indicators in the budget process is not transformed into a mere bureaucratic / formal exercise. Practicability. This include the possibility to have data timely aligned to the timing of the policy impact assessment, in case through estimiates carried out with robust, high-quality and documented methodologies. The Government should have the modelling tool to include the selected indicators in the evaluation exercise, or to be able to build the appropriate models in the short term. Timeliness, extension and frequency of time series. Up-to-date, long, and relatively long time series improve the ability to use indicators both to describe context evolution and to evaluate public policies. The selection must therefore take into account the current availability of indicators and the future possibility for the National statistical office to improve timeliness while ensuring a high level of precision. Transparency and accountability. The chosen indicators have to be interpretable easily and without ambiguity. And it should not be easy to “manipulate” them through ad-hoc policy measures (for example, by changing the threat level of a substance with an administrative decision). Preference should be given to indicators that are more sensitive to policies in the Central Government responsibility rather than to the action of local governments, i.e. more directly linked to the program objectives set by the central government in public finance documents.

36 The final set of indicators
Mean adjusted income (per capita) Income inequality (quintile ratio) Incidence of absolute poverty Life expectancy in good health (at birth) Overweight and obesity Early school leavers Non-participation in employment Employment rate of women aged with/without preschool children Victims of predatory crime (robberies, burglaries and mugging) Mean length of civil justice trials CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions Illegal Building Presented to the Parliament and aproved In force since august 2017

37 Mean adjusted income (1,000 euros per capita)
Source: Istat ( ); MEF ( )

38 Non-participation in employment
(ratio between unemployed + non-active available to work / labour force + non-active available to work) % Source: Istat ( ); MEF ( )

39 Income inequality index
(ratio between the equivalent income of the richest 20% and of the poorest 20%)

40 CO2 and other greenhouse gas emissions (equivalent tons x inhab.)
Source: Istat ( ); MEF ( )

41 https://sustainabledevelopment.un.org/sdgs
On SDGs 17 Goals 169 Targets 241 Indicators

42 The process towards the SDGs


Download ppt "BES Equitable and Sustainable Well-being in Italy"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google