1. GREEN DORM Group 6 Bethany Corcoran Andrew Ehrich Eric Stoutenburg
Kimberly Walton
Kim

2. Stanford Green Dorm
Living laboratory for ongoing research and education on sustainable engineering and student living
Environmental Performance: Zero Carbon
Energy consumption 20% below current best-performing row house on campus (Columbae)
Eliminate net carbon emissions due to operational and embodied energy use over the course of a year
Kim

3. Green Dorm Features West-facing entry porch
Second floor roof deck supporting solar panels
Green roof test beds
Information Center with real-time performance monitoring
Kim

4. The Stanford Delivery Process: Where Are We?
Feasibility Phase Completed
Waiting for Board of Trustees Approval to begin Schematic Design
Design options have been proposed, but no decisions have been determined

5. Our Decision: Energy and Electricity Generation
Options (Ongoing Research):
Solar Thermal Systems
Research by Jonas Ketterle
Biogas / Micro-Combined Heat and Power Systems
Research by Gil Masters
Facility Integrated Vehicle
Research by Paul Kreiner
Shower Drain Heat Exchanger
Green Roofs and Photovoltaic Arrays
Research by David Sheu
Solar Cooker
Research by Chi Nguyen
Andrew

6. Decisions to Make: Baseline Green or Living Laboratory?
Radiant Slab Heating
Electric Car Garage
Solar Orientation for Passive Heating
80% Daylit Interior
Living Laboratory
5 kW Fuel Cell
Solar Hot Water System
60 kW Photovoltaic Array
100% Daylit Interior
Greywater Heat Recovery
Possibly Affected Goals
First Cost
Lifecycle Cost
Lighting Quality
Thermal Comfort
Building Energy
Vehicle Energy
Proving Ground for Building Technology
Innovative Leadership on Campus
Reduced Energy Use
Indoor Environmental Quality
Electricity Quality and Reliability
Andrew

7. Current State Narrative
Eric

8. Future State Narrative
Bethany

9. Owners Stakeholders Designers
University Officials
Board of Trustees
President
Provost
Stakeholders
Users Students Faculty Neighbors Visitors
Operators Maintenance Dining Services Utilities Staff Housing Information Technology Facilities/Grounds Manager Cleaning services
Regulators Fire Marshall and Police Occupational Health and Safety County codes and permits Parking and Transportation
Donors Corporations Alumni Individuals
Designers
Architects Lead Architect Landscape Architect Interior Design Architect Consulting Architects
Engineers Structural Mechanical Electrical Environmental Faculty Consultants LEED Professional
Contractors General Contractor Sub-contractor
Project Manager
Eric

10. Goal Model
Bethany

11. Possible Questions and Tradeoffs
What are the costs of different technologies? How can the design team successfully navigate the potentially competing desires to minimize first cost and reduce energy use through novel and innovative technology?
If the Green Dorm uses a variety of new technologies, how can the design team ensure the requisite quality and reliability needed for a dorm?
How might the combination of a diverse set of energy and electricity generation technologies interact with each other? What technologies can simultaneously satisfy multiple goals?
If the Green Dorm is radically different in its design and day-to-day operation, how will that affect housing, maintenance, and facilities? Will those considerations increase the operation cost, and thus possibly the cost passed on to student residents?
Andrew

12. Next Steps
Identify new option(s) along with Baseline Green & Living Laboratory
Establish preferences
Analyze value
Make decisions & recommendations
Andrew