1. PROJECT
LYREBIRD
HARRIS PANERAS
Title

2. MAINSTREAM ADOPTION

3. QUANTITATIVE RESEARCH

4. CAN THE UNDERSTANDINGS OF CORE COMPONENTS OF AUGMENTED REALITY, SUPPORT FUTURE APPLICATION OF IT, WITHIN THE DESIGN PROCESS?
Question/focus:
Some of these components include:
Maker Tracking
Application Development
And AR Performance handling

5. 1. In what ways can AR be applied as a communicative tool between various consultants on a design project?
2. How can the communicative performance of Augment reality, be measured and evaluated through a visual effect (VFX) methodology?
3. In what ways can quantitative data obtained from user-testing of AR performance analysis inform guidelines for the development of AR applications for the design industry?

6. Standardising:
Spatial Requirements for the Project
Selecting Appropropriate Furnishing Projections (Workstations, chairs, Sofas, Tables etc)
PTW Guidelines in understanding their visual representations and layouts of their brand label (This only constitutes to the markers that correlate to their firm) Other markers will be developed away from PTW guidelines.

7. CONCEPTUALISE
MOBILE
TABLET
HEADSET
VYSORS

8. CONCEPTUALISE
MOBILE
TABLET
HEADSET
VYSORS

9. TRACKING METHOD LIMITATIONS
FLEXIBILITY
VIEWING ANGLE
TECHNOLOGY

10. QUANTIFY
TRACKING LEGIBILITY
TRACKING ACCURACY
DEVICE PERFORMANCE

11. POLYCOUNT VS PERFORMANCES
TRACKING METHOD
CONSTRAINTS
VUFORIA DATABASE
MARKER REQUIREMENTS
LUX LEVELS
MOVEMENT AND VIEWING
VIEWING DISTANCES
MODEL DETAILING
OUTDATED
IMPRACTICAL
MARKER EVALUATIONS
CONTOURS
BORDER
CLEAR SPACE
CODE/ELEMENTS
BACKGROUND/DESIGN
200 VS 1500 LUX
180 VS 360
1M VS 5M
POLYCOUNT VS PERFORMANCES

12. POLYCOUNT VS PERFORMANCES
TRACKING METHOD
CONSTRAINTS
VUFORIA DATABASE
MARKER REQUIREMENTS
LUX LEVELS
MOVEMENT AND VIEWING
VIEWING DISTANCES
MODEL DETAILING
OUTDATED
IMPRACTICAL
MARKER EVALUATIONS
CONTOURS
BORDER
CLEAR SPACE
CODE/ELEMENTS
BACKGROUND/DESIGN
200 VS 1500 LUX
180 VS 360
1M VS 5M
POLYCOUNT VS PERFORMANCES

13. TRACKING METHOD SPATIAL MAPPING 2D MARKER CUBOID MARKER
CYLINDRICAL MARKER
GEO-LOCATION
3D OBJECT TRAKING
MOBILITY
CLIENT CUSTOMISATION
SPITE SPECIFIC
SHAPE CORRELATIONS

14. CONTOURS
BORDER
CLEAR SPACE
CODE/ELEMENTS
BACKGROUND/DESIGN
Standardising:
Marker development
Understnading the 5 main components of a Marker and utilsing the vuforia guidlines to implement

15. MARKER DESIGNS

16. PTW_Marker_Designs Generic_Markers PTW_Markers Triangular Markers
Database issue:
Required a 30% difference visual appearances
Colour was differentiated, whilst shapes and patterns were not
This affected all markers across 2D, cuboid and cylindrical markers

17. MARKER DESIGNS

18. MARKER DESIGNS

19. MARKER DESIGNS

20. MARKER DESIGNS

21. PTW_Marker_Designs 36 Unique Designs Generic_Markers PTW_Markers
Triangular Markers
64 Unique Designs
Database issue:

23. 2D MARKER
CUBOID
MARKER
CYLINDRICAL MARKER

24. Areas | Viewing Distance | Viewing angles | Projections | 20 - 50 m2
270*
5-10 pieces of furnishing
Contextualise:
Spatial Arrangements and requirements

25. Mobile Tablets and Smartphones 500k Maximum Depending on Device
Devices |
Model Poly Count |
Functions |
Room count |
Mobile Tablets and Smartphones
500k Maximum Depending on Device
Mobile Room Customisation
4-6 Separate Rooms
Contextualise:
Device Requirements and Projection Expectations

26. Balsa Wood, 2mm Foam board
Cuboid |
Cylindrical |
Materials |
180* (A4, A3)
360* (A4, A3)
Balsa Wood, 2mm Foam board
Iterate:
Marker Generation

27. Technology Limitations
Quantification |
Tracking Legibility
Tracking Accuracy
Technology Limitations
Next Steps:
Quantification in performance and outcomes

28. QUANTITATIVE METHOD
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3

29. Movement Projection
Iteration 1
Iteration 2
Iteration 3

30. 1 2 3 1 2 3 1 2 3

33. QUANTITATIVE OUTCOME

36. Further investigation into viewing distances and angles
FURTHER WORK
Further investigation into viewing distances and angles
Onsite testing of prototypes
Translation between Augmented Reality (AR) and User Interface (UI)
What did you learn from your research
Outcomes of the quantification methods

37. PROJECT
LYREBIRD
HARRIS PANERAS
Title