Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017"— Presentation transcript:

1 Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017
Hollywood RAS Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017 Los angeles department of water and power

2 OVERVIEW

3 PURPOSE In 2016 the Hollywood RAS was presented and approved as a Safety Net. Its initial purpose was to prevent transient instability, thermal overload, and voltage instability associated with the loss of the Toluca Substation (RS-E) or simultaneous loss of the three (3) Toluca-Hollywood parallel lines Because of the Ten Year Planning Assessment Study from 2016, three (3) new contingencies were identified and will be added to do the following: Protect against thermal overload of the remaining circuit for the loss of any two (2) TOL-HWD Detection and mitigation strategy that utilizes Line Loss Detection + Power Flow

4 Overall Power System

5 System Overview

6 Planning Study

7 Planning Study Results
Study results, using approved WECC 2020 Heavy Summer base case, showed the loss of two (2) Toluca-Hollywood lines causes thermal overload on the remaining Hollywood Line Contingency 5: Loss of TOL-HWD Line 1 and TOL-HWD Line 3 Contingency 6: Loss of TOL-HWD Line 1 and TOL-HWD Line 2 Contingency 7: Loss of TOL-HWD Line 2 and TOL-HWD Line 3

8 One Line Diagram

9 Hollywood RAS Logic: TOL-HWD Transmission Circuit Flows
The RAS logic predicts post-contingency and post-remedial MW flows on TOL-HWD transmission circuits based on the following: Real-time, pre-contingency MW flows Contingency and injection distribution factors obtained from power flow simulations

10 Hollywood RAS Logic: Arming
The RAS logic arms remedial action to prevent predicted post-contingency MW flows on TOL-HWD transmission circuits from exceeding emergency ratings

11 Contingency 5: Loss of TOL-HWD Line 1 & Line 3
TOL-HWD Line 2 Ratings Sec Description Cont. Rating (MVA) A Bank 1 at Toluca 272 B One 138kV overhead transmission line 297* C1 138kV underground, overhead, and disconnect switches 182* C2 138kV underround, overhead, and disconnect switches D Disconnect switches at Hollywood 287 Loss of TOL-HWD Line 1 and TOL-HWD Line 2 * Use the lowest rating

12 Contingency 5: Planning Flowchart
TH1=Actual TOL-HWD 1 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH2=Actual TOL-HWD 2 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH3=Actual TOL-HWD 3 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH2’ = Calculated post-contingency MW flow on TOL-HWD 2 positive flowing into HWD

13 Contingency 5: Simplified Logic

14 Contingency 5: Post-Contingency Flow
Power Flow Results of Loss of TOL-HWD Lines 1 & 3 Lines Pre-contingency Flow (MW) Post-contingency Flow (MW) TOL-HWD Line 1 232 TOL-HWD Line 2 115 389 TOL-HWD Line 3 226 To relieve the overload on TOL-HWD L2, 241 MW of load needs to be shed.

15 Contingency 6: Loss of TOL-HWD Line 1 & Line 2
TOL-HWD Line 3 Rating Description Continuous Rating (MVA) One section of overhead Transmission Line and one section of underground cable 494* Bank F at Hollywood 400 * Use the lowest rating Loss of TOL-HWD Line 1 and TOL-HWD Line 2

16 Contingency 6: Planning Flowchart
TH1=Actual TOL-HWD 1 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH2=Actual TOL-HWD 2 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH3=Actual TOL-HWD 3 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH3’=Calculated post-contingency MW flow on TOL-HWD 3, positive flowing into HWD

17 Contingency 6: Simplified Logic

18 Contingency 6: Post-Contingency Flow
Power Flow Results of Loss of TOL-HWD Lines 1 & 2 Lines Pre-contingency Flow (MW) Post-contingency Flow (MW) TOL-HWD Line 1 232 TOL-HWD Line 2 115 TOL-HWD Line 3 226 486 To relieve the overload on TOL-HWD L3, 137 MW of load needs to be shed.

19 Contingency 7: Loss of TOL-HWD Line 2 & Line 3
TOL-HWD Line 1 Rating Description Continuous Rating (MVA) One section of overhead Transmission Line and one section of underground cable 313* Bank E at Hollywood 405 * Use the lowest rating Flow on TOL-HWD L1 After Load-shedding at Hollywood

20 Contingency 7: Planning Flowchart
TH1=Actual TOL-HWD 1 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH2=Actual TOL-HWD 2 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH3=Actual TOL-HWD 3 MW flow, positive flowing into HWD TH1’=Calculated post-contingency MW flow on TOL-HWD 1, positive flowing into HWD

21 Contingency 7: Logic

22 Contingency 7: Post-Contingency Flow
Power Flow Results of Loss of TOL-HWD Lines 2 & 3 Lines Pre-contingency Flow (MW) Post-contingency Flow (MW) TOL-HWD Line 1 232 489 TOL-HWD Line 2 115 TOL-HWD Line 3 226 To relieve the overload on TOL-HWD L1, 238 MW of load needs to be shed.

23 Impacts of a Failure of a RAS to Operate
No violation of TPL-001-WECC-CRT-3 Maximum firm load loss ≤ 300 MW Maximum generation loss ≤ 1000 MW Contingencies 5-7 meet the LAPS criteria Note! Contingencies 1-4 continue to be a Safety Net as previously approved.

24 RAS LOGIC

25 RAS Devices The same devices will be utilized for new HWDRAS contingencies as previously approved for Safety Net contingencies: NO NEW HARDWARE GE-N60 relays are used to Gather local data Transfer data using IEC telecommunications protocol Perform local trips GE-C90P relays Process all the data and run it through logic Use IEC to send a remedial trip to the N60s notifying them to trip local breakers

26 Line Loss Logic Detection

27 New Contingencies Double circuit outage for Toluca-Hollywood path: Either N-2 or N-1-1 Contingency 5 Loss of Toluca-Hollywood lines 1 and 3 with Post-Contingency Toluca-Hollywood Line 2 MW >= 260 MW Contingency 6 Loss of Toluca-Hollywood lines 1 and 2 with Post-Contingency Toluca-Hollywood Line 3 MW >= 403 MW Contingency 7 Loss of Toluca-Hollywood Lines 2 and 3 with Post-Contingency Toluca-Hollywood Line 1 MW >= 320 MW

28 CB Assume Open HWDRAS CB Assume Open only applied to CBs associated with Line Loss Detection TOLUCA TOL-HOL 1 TOL-HOL 2 TOL-HOL 3 CB-E201 CB-E202 CB-E101 CB-E102 CB-E191 CB-E192 HOLLYWOOD HOL-FAR A HOL-FAR B CB-E21 CB-E22 CB-E41 CB-E42 CB-E12 CB-E13 E81 E72 FAIRFAX E11 E12 E21 E22 NOTE! Logic for manual cb ASSUME OPEN to facilitate work on cb isolated from system via open disconnects

29 How to Set CB Assume Open
NOTE! The operator will have to Press Local Button for 5 seconds.

30 How to Set CB Assume Open
After the Relay is under a Local Command, the operator must press the pushbutton for the desired “CB Assume Open.” After the operator presses the CB Assume Open, an alarm “CB Assume Open” will be sent to ECC indicating the station name with bay number.

31 RAS Testing & Maintence

32 RAS End-to-End Commissioning Test
Overall end-to-end test will be performed for commissioning This is a complete test using power system simulators connected via satellite time sync To avoid a complete system outage, outputs will be checked one terminal at a time Block the RAS system with blocking switches Use multiple test sets and dummy breakers to simulate a line loss Synchronize test sets with a GPS signal Trip test CBs one at a time

33 Commissioning Tests The following will be checked and verified during commissioning RAS Settings Contingency Logic I/O CTs. PTs, 52a, and 52b Circuit Breaker Pallets Contingency Operation Contingency Time Operation DC Circuitry Trips Communication Channels Wiring Prints Annunciator Alarms SCADA Control and Status Indications After commissioning, the UR Engineering software will be used to extract the Master Settings file for each device

34 RAS Annual Maintenance
System Approach – Maintenance can be performed from RS-H for the entire RAS A or RAS B system The Master Settings file will be used as a reference to verify relay settings and logic If any unauthorized change is made to an HWDRAS device the system automatically sends an alarm to the Grid Operation Center

35 RAS Annual Maintenance Process
Use the latest software to do the following: Compare the relay settings and logic with the Master Settings file for the device. Verify that the settings and logic have not changed. Perform a remote load check for each terminal to verify the integrity of the PTs and CTs. Compare RAS A values with RAS B values. NOTE! Communication channels, CB pallets, C90P/N60 devices, and contingencies arming are continuously monitored. If a failure event occurs, the system automatically sends an alarm to Grid Operation Center.

36 RAS 5-Year Functional Test
This is an individual circuit approach, and work will be performed on every circuit in the RAS A and B systems, one system at a time The Functional Test combined with Annual Maintenance checks the following to ensure compliance with PRC-005 Settings and Logic Communication Channels Inputs and Outputs Arming Contingencies Communication Time Delay System Operating Time Delay Automatic Arming CT and PT Integrity CIP Alarms 52-a and 52-b CB Pallets Trip DC Circuitry SCADA Controls

37 HWD RAS SUMMARY

38 Conclusion No system thermal overload after applying the RAS for the new contingency. No violation of TPL-001-WECC-CRT-3. Maximum firm load loss ≤ 300 MW. Maximum generation loss ≤ 1000 MW. No additional hardware was needed for the new contingencies 5-7. The addition of Contingencies 5, 6, and 7 meet the criteria of a LAPS. Hence, it remains a Safety Net.

39 Summary A new set of contingencies were identified
Contingencies 5, 6, and 7 were added to protect the overload condition on the remaining TOL-HWD line for the loss of any two (2) TOL-HWD lines LADWP requests the continued acknowledgement of the Hollywood RAS as a Safety Net.

40 QUESTIONS?

41 TIME TO VOTE! LADWP requests the continued acknowledgement of the Hollywood RAS as a Safety Net.


Download ppt "Presented by: LADWP November 14, 2017"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google