Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Fig. 2. DoFE for WGD retained genes of two subgenomes.

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Fig. 2. DoFE for WGD retained genes of two subgenomes."— Presentation transcript:

1 Fig. 2. DoFE for WGD retained genes of two subgenomes.
From: Population Level Purifying Selection and Gene Expression Shape Subgenome Evolution in Maize Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(12): doi: /molbev/msv191 Mol Biol Evol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

2 Fig. 1. Left: Correlation plot of logarithm of nucleotide diversity for introns for duplicated gene pairs. Right: Correlation plot for nucleotide diversity of upstream (2 kb) regions of duplicated gene pairs. From: Population Level Purifying Selection and Gene Expression Shape Subgenome Evolution in Maize Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(12): doi: /molbev/msv191 Mol Biol Evol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

3 Fig. 3. Median of ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous diversity Πn/Πs compared between different data sets. Increase in strength of purifying selection from UED-repressed to tissuewise subfunctionalized (BED) to UED-dominant genes. P values were calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test: ****P < 2.2 × 10<sup>−16</sup>; ***P = 1.9 × 10<sup>−15</sup>; **P = 2 × 10<sup>−6</sup>; *P = 3 × 10<sup>−4</sup>. From: Population Level Purifying Selection and Gene Expression Shape Subgenome Evolution in Maize Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(12): doi: /molbev/msv191 Mol Biol Evol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

4 Fig. 4. Ratio of nonsynonymous to synonymous nucleotide diversity (Πn/Πs) for maize subgenome 1 and 2 genes for different expression classifications. UED-D, UED-dominant; UED-R, UED-repressed. P values were calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test: *P = 2.9 × 10<sup>−4</sup>; ns, not significant. From: Population Level Purifying Selection and Gene Expression Shape Subgenome Evolution in Maize Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(12): doi: /molbev/msv191 Mol Biol Evol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

5 Fig. 5. Number of maize1 and maize2 BED genes dominantly expressed in each tissue. A complete plot with 22 tissues is available in supplementary fig. S10, Supplementary Material online. From: Population Level Purifying Selection and Gene Expression Shape Subgenome Evolution in Maize Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(12): doi: /molbev/msv191 Mol Biol Evol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please

6 Fig. 6. Median of the nearest upstream distance to a TE for different expression categories. P values were calculated using Wilcoxon rank-sum test: *P < 1 × 10<sup>−7</sup>; ns, not significant. From: Population Level Purifying Selection and Gene Expression Shape Subgenome Evolution in Maize Mol Biol Evol. 2015;32(12): doi: /molbev/msv191 Mol Biol Evol | © The Author Published by Oxford University Press on behalf of the Society for Molecular Biology and Evolution. All rights reserved. For permissions, please


Download ppt "Fig. 2. DoFE for WGD retained genes of two subgenomes."

Similar presentations


Ads by Google