Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
1
Mediasite Pilot Presentation to UTFAB
Sally Hibbitt, ACNS/CTSS Nov. 18, 2008
2
Videocasting Audio, Video, Visuals
Definition of Terms Mediasite device for capturing lectures Videocasting Audio, Video, Visuals Podcasting Audio only
3
Mediasite Capabilities
Captures components of lecture Audio Motion video Visual presentation from computer (PowerPoint, any other program being displayed) Keeps all 3 sources synchronized Displays 2 windows within 1 screen Watch presenter View slides View both
4
Mediasite Capabilities cont.
Capture and archive for on-demand playback: from central server Capture and store: on a jump drive - files are approximately 1MB/min on CD or DVD (internal burner is provided in device) Stream session live
5
Samples MECH 530: Don Radford CS 475: Sanjay Rajopadhye
CS 475: Sanjay Rajopadhye SPCM 200: Student speeches
6
Year 1 Course Recordings
101B NESB: CIVE 520, MECH 530, CS 575, CIVE 516, MECH 411 A206 Clark: MECH 431, SPCM 346, CIVE 522 Portable device: SPCM 200 (4 sections)
7
Year 1 Budget Expenditures
2 Mediasite recorders $43,406 2 Vaddio camera systems $ 9,321 Monitors $ 3,299 Installation hardware/materials $ Technicians $ 2,580 _________________________________ TOTAL $58,952
8
Year 1 University Contribution
Staff time (summer 07/fall 07/spring 08) ACNS staff: hours DCE staff: hours
9
Survey Results Conducted fall and spring semesters surveys
Students positive responses to resource Instructor feedback Positive comments
10
Student Feedback Why did you watch the lecture? Missed the class 43%
Went to class but didn’t understand a concept from the class 34% Went to class but needed to review content for an exam 51%
11
Student Feedback How much benefit did you get from this resource?
No real benefit 0% Some benefit 38% A substantial amount of benefit 62%
12
Student Feedback Did having these resources change your class attendance habits? Yes 17% No 83%
13
Student Feedback Which statements are most accurate about your attendance in a class offering video lectures as an on-line resource? I went to class because watching video is not a substitute 60% I missed a few classes but was less stressed because I knew I could catch up by watching the video 43% I skipped more classes because I could watch the video 4%
14
Student Feedback Which of the following apply to you?
The video helped me improve my understanding of content and possibly improve my grade 81% Video made it convenient to catch up if I did miss class 57% I attended class regularly and/or understood the content and did not have a need to view video 4%
15
Student Feedback Would you like to see more of your instructors offer course materials as a video resource? Yes 96% No 4%
16
Student Feedback The cost of this technology for the first year averaged out to be approximately $1.50/student for the semester. Should additional student tech fees be used to make it possible to offer more video resources? Yes 82% No 18%
17
Faculty Feedback “Overall, I think Mediasite was WONDERFUL!...
I can’t even begin to tell you how much better these recordings appear and sound! The old VHS ones often seemed distorted, so the Mediasite ones were such a nice improvement!... Students have been watching them…I can tell because their self-evaluations of their speeches are much more detailed and accurate. I would strongly recommend that we either continue with the pilot study or try to put this into standard practice.” -Hollie Petit SPCM 200
18
Faculty Feedback “I think it is great that CTSS is doing this and I hope I will get a chance to do this at least one more time to fix my bugs. I have added a lot to this course and some of it has ample room for improvement.” -Wim Bohm CS 575
19
Year 2 Course Recordings (currently for fall 08)
101B NESB: CIVE 520, MECH 532, CS 475, ENGR 510 A206 Clark: MECH 431, STAT 511, SOC 461
20
Year 2 University Contribution
Mediasite portable recorder & server software maintenance renewal $ 8,491 Staffing $24,000 ___________________________________ TOTAL $32,491 20
21
Year 2 Request to UTFAB Mediasite rack-mounted recorder maintenance renewals $3, $7,410 Part-time staffing $4,000 __________________________________________ TOTAL $11,410
22
UTFAB Funding Criteria
1. Benefit as many students as possible High potential 2. Ability to effectively utilize the fee Year 1 surveys indicate “Yes” 3. Not funded by CFT Not funded 4. Adherence to budget and accountability Year 1 – under budget 5. Potential for direct student use Yes 6. Effort, thought & clarity in the plan Your call 7. Quantitative usage data 8. Financial co-sponsorship Additional University staff support & investment 9. Central/distributed balance Not applicable 10. Cost/benefit ratio Survey indicates good ratio
23
Thank you for supporting
this experiment. Questions?
Similar presentations
© 2025 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.