Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts

Published byChristian Cunningham Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts"— Presentation transcript:

1 Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts
Natalie Harvey, Helen Dacre (Reading) Helen Webster, David Thomson, Mike Cooke (Met Office) Nathan Huntley (Durham)

2 Improving confidence in volcanic ash forecasts
Natalie Harvey, Helen Dacre (Reading) Helen Webster, David Thomson, Mike Cooke (Met Office) Nathan Huntley (Durham)

3 Probabilistic Forecast Example: 1200 14 May 2010
Medium contamination (2x10-3 g/m3)

4 Sources of uncertainty
During volcanic eruptions, volcanic ash transport and dispersion models (VATDs) are used to forecast the location and movement of ash clouds. VATD models use time varying wind fields (from NWP models, typically every 3 hrs) to calculate the trajectories of particles. Those models use input parameters, called 'eruption source parameters', such as plume height H, mass eruption rate dM/dt, duration D, and the mass fraction of erupted debris finer than 63 μm, which can remain in the cloud for many hours or days. Estimation of these parameters is by no means a trivial task and is specific to each eruption. VATD models include Hysplit, NAME, Flexpart, Puff, MLDP0 The accuracy of VATD model forecasts is largely dependent on the accuracy of the input parameters, known as eruption source parameters (ESP’s) These include The height of the volcanic ash plume above the volcano vent, H The mass eruption rate, dM/dt The duration of the eruption The vertical distribution of ash in the plume The mass fraction of erupted debris finer than 63 μm, which can remain in the cloud for many hours or days. Much of the ash in the eruption plume falls out close to the volcano and to estimate concentrations of ash at long ranges an estimate of the fraction of the ash that survives early fall out is needed (distal fine ash fraction). The processes controlling the evolution of the concentration in the distal ash cloud include sedimentation and deposition of particles, horizontal and vertical mixing processes and wind shear. Missing processes Imperfect model

5 Quantifying uncertainty Emulation
With this emulator, we can explore the parameter space much faster, and furthermore identify plausible and implausible regions (for instance through history matching). Early investigations suggest that the average concentration over a particular region and time can be used to build useful emulators. Quantifying uncertainty Emulation 3 variables 1 variable 2 variables

6 Quantifying uncertainty Emulation
With this emulator, we can explore the parameter space much faster, and furthermore identify plausible and implausible regions (for instance through history matching). Early investigations suggest that the average concentration over a particular region and time can be used to build useful emulators. Quantifying uncertainty Emulation More than 3 variables? 3 variables 1 variable 2 variables

7 Quantifying uncertainty Emulation
With this emulator, we can explore the parameter space much faster, and furthermore identify plausible and implausible regions (for instance through history matching). Early investigations suggest that the average concentration over a particular region and time can be used to build useful emulators. Quantifying uncertainty Emulation Dispersion model Complex – over 25 different parameters Runs slowly Can’t easily understand interactions Emulator Simple approximation of complex model Quickly evaluated over large range of parameter space Identify parameters that contribute most to the uncertainty in the output and interactions between them 1. Variable 3 2. Variable 7 3. Variable 1 4. Variable 22 ….. Statistics happens here! Statistics happens here!

8 Quantifying uncertainty Example: 14 May 2010
500 NAME runs 15 parameters varied (all at the same time) Parameter ranges determined by experts in the field

9 Quantifying uncertainty Example: 14 May 2010
Emulate average ash column loading in 81 pre-determined regions (2/3 per hour) “Best guess” model Satellite

10 Quantifying uncertainty Most important parameters
This information can be used to inform future research and measurement campaigns. Prioritise variables (and their ranges) to perturb for a small operational ensemble plume height and mass eruption rate Free tropospheric turbulence Precipitation level required for wet deposition Particle size distribution

11 What is a good spatial forecast?
Example: 14 May 2010 Model RGB satellite Visible satellite Ash loadings IASI ash index

12 What is a good spatial forecast? Spatial comparison
Problem: Model output is more spatially coherent with a wide range of concentration values compared to the satellite. This is due to the satellite having a detection limit. Answer: Match the number of model pixels to the number of satellite pixels before performing comparison. Choose pixels with highest levels of ash Column loading (µg/m2)

13 What is a good spatial forecast? Spatial comparison
Look in the neighbouring grid boxes and compares the fraction containing ash Increase neighbourhood size to get measure of “useful” skill or scale at which we “trust” the forecast Model Obs Model Obs 1 1 0 1 3 9 3 9

14 What is a good spatial forecast? Spatial comparison
Satellite Model Scale 200 km 5 times grid scale 40 km grid scale Harvey & Dacre (2015)

15 Probabilistic Forecast? Many realisations
Different information about the volcano Different input meteorology Different model parameters Different models

16 Probabilistic Forecast? Ash concentration threshold
Low contamination (2x10-4 g/m3) Medium contamination (2x10-3 g/m3)

17 Probabilistic Forecast? Probability threshold
Low contamination (2x10-4 g/m3) One model run

18 Probabilistic Forecast? Region of interest
Source: EUROCONTROL

19 Probabilistic Forecast? Region of interest
Fraction of FIR with ash Maximum fraction in FIR Mean fraction in FIR

20 Probabilistic Forecast? Along flight path
High contamination One model realisation Medium contamination Low contamination Ten model realisations

21 Probabilistic Forecast? Impact models?

22 Improving confidence in volcanic ash forecasts
Emulation can be used to find the parameters that contribute most to the uncertainty in model output Inform research priorities Prioritise variables to perturb for a small operational ensemble Now have a metric which can be used to determine the scale over which a model can be trusted and can be applied to probabilistic forecasts What is the most useful way to convey probabilistic information to decision makers?

23 Questions?

24

Download ppt "Quantifying uncertainty in volcanic ash forecasts"

Similar presentations

The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre The Prediction And Observation Of Volcanic Ash Clouds During The Eyjafjallajökull Eruption Helen Dacre and Alan Grant.
What’s quasi-equilibrium all about?

What’s quasi-equilibrium all about?
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre AGU Dec 2008 Boundary Layer Ventilation by Convection and Coastal Processes Helen Dacre, Sue Gray, Stephen Belcher.
Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are.

Vertical distribution of ash at source Time-height plots of mass concentration at Chilbolton. The height above the summit into which ash particles are.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre AMS 2010 Air Quality Forecasting using a Numerical Weather Prediction Model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.

The University of Reading Helen Dacre UM user 2009 Forecasting the transport of pollution using a NWP model ETEX Surface Measurement Sites.
SIPR Dundee. © Crown copyright Scottish Flood Forecasting Service Pete Buchanan – Met Office Richard Maxey – SEPA SIPR, Dundee, 21 June 2011.

SIPR Dundee. © Crown copyright Scottish Flood Forecasting Service Pete Buchanan – Met Office Richard Maxey – SEPA SIPR, Dundee, 21 June 2011.
Georgia Chapter of the Air & Waste Management Association Annual Conference: Improved Air Quality Modeling for Predicting the Impacts of Controlled Forest.

Georgia Chapter of the Air & Waste Management Association Annual Conference: Improved Air Quality Modeling for Predicting the Impacts of Controlled Forest.
Details for Today: DATE:3 rd February 2005 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Assignment 2 briefing Evaluation of Model Performance 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models.

Details for Today: DATE:3 rd February 2005 BY:Mark Cresswell FOLLOWED BY:Assignment 2 briefing Evaluation of Model Performance 69EG3137 – Impacts & Models.
ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.

ADMS ADMS 3.3 Modelling Summary of Model Features.
Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.

Statistics, data, and deterministic models NRCSE.
Weather Support for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)

Weather Support for Weapons of Mass Destruction (WMD)
CHAPTER 3: SIMPLE MODELS

CHAPTER 3: SIMPLE MODELS
Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.

Chapter 13 – Weather Analysis and Forecasting. The National Weather Service The National Weather Service (NWS) is responsible for forecasts several times.
Reconstructing the Emission Height of Volcanic SO2 from Back Trajectories: Comparison of Explosive and Effusive Eruptions Modeling trace gas transport.

Reconstructing the Emission Height of Volcanic SO2 from Back Trajectories: Comparison of Explosive and Effusive Eruptions Modeling trace gas transport.
Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Alice Crawford 1,2, Barbara Stunder 1, Roland Draxler 1, Michael J. Pavolonis 3, Ariel Stein 1 1.NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College.

Tianfeng Chai 1,2, Alice Crawford 1,2, Barbara Stunder 1, Roland Draxler 1, Michael J. Pavolonis 3, Ariel Stein 1 1.NOAA Air Resources Laboratory, College.
Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.

Natalie Harvey | Helen Dacre Figure 1 Future Work Conduct sensitivity experiments to understand the relative importance.
Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service météorologique du Canada Modeling Volcanic Ash Transport and Dispersion:

Environment Canada Meteorological Service of Canada Environnement Canada Service météorologique du Canada Modeling Volcanic Ash Transport and Dispersion:
Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 1 Helen Dacre 1, Alan Grant 1, Natalie Harvey 1, Helen Webster 2, Ben Johnson 2, David Thomson.

Helen DacreDepartment of MeteorologyUniversity of Reading 1 Helen Dacre 1, Alan Grant 1, Natalie Harvey 1, Helen Webster 2, Ben Johnson 2, David Thomson.
Page 1GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 ENSEMBLES. Page 2GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 The ENSEMBLES Project  Began 4 years ago, will end in December 2009  Supported by.

Page 1GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 ENSEMBLES. Page 2GMES - ENSEMBLES 2008 The ENSEMBLES Project  Began 4 years ago, will end in December 2009  Supported by.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google