Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Robustness Evaluation of Perceptual Watermarks

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Robustness Evaluation of Perceptual Watermarks"— Presentation transcript:

1 Robustness Evaluation of Perceptual Watermarks
Author: Corina Nafornita Source: International Symposium on Signals,Circuits and Systems 2007 ISSCS 2007 Presented by:張景程 Data:

2 Outline Introduction Detection method Simulation result Conclusion

3 Introduction In a watermarking system, robustness
evaluation should be made if invisibility criteria are satisfied. Several watermarked images were tested for different types of attacks (JPEG compression, median filtering, resizing, cropping and gamma correction) in order to see the effect of these attacks on the detector results

4 Detection method(1/6) DWT 4-level DWT 1-levels watermark

5 Detection method(2/6) All coefficients from the subbands from level 0 by addition: : embedded watermark in level 0 : embedding strength :a weighing function, which is a half of the step

6 Detection method(3/6) The step with three factors:
First factor is the sensitivity to noise depending on the orientation and on the level of detail:

7 Detection method(4/6) Second factor takes into account the local brightness based on the gray level values of the low pass version of the image: too dark original thumbnail Brightness proportion switch Coordinate embed

8 Detection method(5/6) Third factor is computed in the neighborhood of the pixel. It including two parts : First is the local mean square value of the DWT coefficients in all detail subbands Second is the local variance of the low-pass subband.

9 Level=0 K=3 K=2 K=1 K=0 average quare coefficients
Original image proportion to average K=3 K=2 K=1 K=0 average quare coefficients

10 Variance If square coefficients is and average is Z Coordinate

11 Detection method(6/6) Finally, detection is made using the correlation between the marked DWT coefficients and the watermarking sequence to be tested for presence: Average of the three part

12 Simulation results AT level =0 with different embedding strengths .
For =0.2(Method 1) and =0.4 (Method 2)

13 Different types of attack(1/2)

14 Different types of attack(2/2)

15 Conclusions The two methods were comparable and they
successfully detected the watermark only in the case of mild attacks


Download ppt "Robustness Evaluation of Perceptual Watermarks"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google