1. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Techno-economic analysis model architecture

2. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Thermodynamic cycle configuration of a recuperated cogeneration gas turbine engine: station numbering

3. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of polystyrene insulation thickness on digester tank heat demand

4. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of cycle OPR and COT on recuperated engine performance parameters: (a) electrical efficiency ratio, (b) heat rate ratio, and (c) recuperator GS inlet and AS exit temperatures for nrec=88%

5. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of recuperator effectiveness nrec and cycle COT on electrical efficiency

6. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of technology level on cogenerated gas turbine cycle performance parameters: (a) electrical efficiency ratio, (b) heat rate ratio, and (c) exergetic efficiency ratio

7. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of COT and OPR on the exergetic efficiency of cogenerated gas turbine engine cycles

8. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Economic sustainability assessment: (a) annual revenue and expenses, (b) annual EBITDA, OIBDA and EBT, and (c) cash account

9. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of gas turbine technology level on projected cash account

10. Date of download: 12/22/2017
Copyright © ASME. All rights reserved.
From: Techno-Economic Assessment of Gas Turbine Cogeneration Cycles Utilizing Anaerobic Digestion Products for Biogas Fuel
J. Eng. Gas Turbines Power. 2016;139(1): doi: /
Figure Legend:
Effect of gas turbine technology level on the IRR