Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Publishers and online subscription models

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Publishers and online subscription models"— Presentation transcript:

1 Publishers and online subscription models
Kaufman-Wills Group, LLC Charleston Conference November 7, 2003

2 Overview Types of institutional subscription models
Examples of publishers using each model Pros and cons from publisher perspective Differences among commercial and non-profits Decision-making considerations Financial Sales and marketing Customer service and fulfillment Future trends Wellcome Trust scenarios Author-led Actual use

3 Types of subscription models
Bundled print and online Unbundled Bundled option Online only Print only (addl print) Tiered pricing Concurrent use Number of seats Workstation (1 IP, user name/password) Size of institution FTE Relevant FTE Type of institution Carnegie Classification Academic, government, corporate Open access Author/institutional paid Society supported

4 Publisher examples Bundled print and online Size of institution
Unbundled Concurrent users Single simultaneous user, Or site license Size of institution Carnegie Type of institution Open access Institutional membership/author paid Society supported

5 Pros and cons: publisher perspective
Bundled Pros: Raise print price to cover online, maintains print, simple product pricing Cons: Unresponsive to user needs, production costs for two formats Unbundled Pros: User demand, opens door for usage based pricing, print can be add-on Cons: More complicated pricing, threat to advertising, difficult transition Concurrent use Pros: Can keep institution’s costs down, may equate to use Cons: Not really tied to use, restricted access, difficult to administer Size of institution Pros: Starts to equate to usage, revenues offset personal and inst subscriptions Cons: FTEs v relevant FTEs argument; difficult to determine tier, implement Type of institution Pros: Easier to identify than size, HighWire supported, “fit in with the pack” Cons: Difficult to differentiate between tiers, hard to figure for inst outside of US Open access Pros: Open to experimentation, pro-institution, may attract more papers Cons: Unproven financial return, author hardship to pay?, low citation impact

6 Decision-making considerations
Financial Replace loss of subscriptions as individuals gain access through institutional site licenses Replace loss of (multiple) print subscriptions as institutions purchase site-wide, desktop access Sales and marketing Easier to market print plus online features than online and print as separate products Separate pricing, editorial development needed for specialty gateways, title collections Personal sales needed for top tier, multi-site, and consortial license negotiation and sales Customer service and fulfillment No new systems required for bundled model New fulfillment systems, customer service training needed for tiered models

7 Future trends Actual use… the beginnings or flashback to the past
To determine tiers: equating number of downloads for non-US institutions to equivalent downloads for US institutions American Physical Society BMJ (for 2005) Institution, author-led Author repositories: DSpace initiative (MIT) SPARC, University of California initiative Wellcome Trust scenarios More of the same Commercial withdrawal Commercial publishers gain more control Deposit libraries and open access become dominant

8 www.kaufmanwills.com Alma J. Wills, Partner Selected clients
Cara S. Kaufman, Partner Kaufman-Wills Group, LLC 24 Aintree Road Baltimore, MD 21286 (ph) (fax) Selected clients Am Acad Ped Am Assoc Immunologists Am Coll Cardiology Am Coll Radiology American Psychiatric Assoc Am Soc Clin Oncology ASPET ASTRO Intl Anesthesia Res Soc NEJM Proj Hope/Hlth Affairs Alma: former President, Periodicals Div, Williams & Wilkins Cara: former Publisher, Am Heart Assoc journals, The Lancet


Download ppt "Publishers and online subscription models"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google