Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017.

Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017

Overview January 2017, City Council adopted initial amendments to the City’s accessory dwelling unit regulations Requested Planning & Community Development Department staff to conduct a comprehensive review of existing accessory dwelling unit regulations and return by end of June 2017 with potential revisions June 19, 2017, City Council considered and discussed a series of proposed amendments At the conclusion of the meeting, City Council directed staff to conduct additional research on a number of specific topics and conduct additional community outreach prior to returning to City Council

What is an Accessory Dwelling Unit (ADU)?
A self-contained residential unit that shares the same lot as the primary residential dwelling May be attached to the existing dwelling unit, or detached from the existing dwelling unit Generally includes a living room, sleeping area, kitchen, and a bathroom

Purpose of Proposed Amendments
Ensure that City ordinance complies with intent of State Law Facilitate creation of accessory dwelling units to provide additional housing opportunities Provide appropriate standards and limitations as allowed by the State Law to maintain character of the single-family neighborhoods Focus on changes to regulations related to ADUs that are created by adding new square footage (“Newly Constructed ADUs) Respond to City Council direction from June 19, meeting .

City Council: June 19 City Council considered a series of proposed amendments for Newly Constructed ADUs Council concerned proposed amendments were not restrictive enough and could have negative consequences Proposed minimum qualifying lot size of 5,000 square feet too small and too much of a change from existing 15,000 square feet. Proposed rear and side yard setbacks allowed an ADU to be too close to rear and/or side property lines Negative impact on character of historic districts. Other concerns included loss of mature tree canopy, narrow streets, reduction of impact fees, and not enough opportunities for community input

Community Outreach Since June 19
Community Meetings September 21 & 25, 2017 (City Hall) Landmark and National Register District Representatives October 17, 2017 (Jackie Robinson Center) City-wide meeting October 19, 2017 (Pasadena Senior Center) Other Meetings October 11, 2017: Bungalow Heaven Annual Meeting October 26, 2017: Council District #5 Town Hall

Community Meetings Summary of Comments
Majority of comments indicated support for less restrictive standards for “Newly Constructed ADUs”: Lower minimum lot size requirement (5,000 s.f. or no minimum) Allow such units in Hillside and Historic Districts under certain conditions Increase maximum unit size Comments also received in opposition to less restrictive standards based on preservation of single-family neighborhood character Other concerns related to enforcement, Residential Impact Fee, tree preservation, and impact of Accessory Dwelling Units on housing supply and affordable housing

Revised Amendments Significant changes to ADU ordinance (mostly for Newly Constructed ADUs): Location Requirements Minimum lot size Historic Districts Base Zoning Setbacks for Detached Newly Constructed ADUs Tree Preservation Maximum Unit Size

Revised Amendments: Location Requirement for Exterior ADUs - Minimum Lot Size
Re-evaluated Minimum Lot Size Requirements Analysis of property profiles in Pasadena Existing 15,000 sq. ft. minimum lot size requirement is restrictive Majority of public comments supported lower minimum lot size, ranging from 5,000 square feet to 10,000 square feet, with some support for no minimum Not consistent with the intent of the State Law

Revised Amendments: Location Requirement for Newly Constructed ADUs – Minimum Lot Size
7,200 square feet: Approximately 9,901 out of 20,331 recommended RS- zoned properties would be eligible (~49%) Includes Historic Districts Does not include Hillside Districts

7,200 square feet Minimum lot size required for new lots in RS-6 zoning Consistent with other cities practice of utilizing the minimum lot size required of a typical single-family property Staff’s original recommendation to the Planning Commission Recommendation: Lower the minimum lot size from 15,000 to 7,200 square feet for Newly Constructed ADUs So, Staff then considered 7,200 square feet, which is the min lot size required for new lots in RS-6 zoning district in the City, which is the most typical SF zoning district in the City. Based on the analysis, a min lot size requirement of 7,200 square feet provides sufficient opportunity to the community to create ADUs since it includes approximately 73% of all RS-zoned properties. Also, it is consistent with the practice of a number of other cities, as the min lot size requirements for ADUs in other cities if there is such standard, were generally consistent with the min lot size required of a typical SF zoning district in respective cities. For these reasons, staff originally recommended the minimum lot size requirement for Exterior Accessory Dwelling Units be lowered to 7,200 square feet.

Revised Amendments Location Requirement for Newly Constructed ADUs – Historic Districts
Landmark and other historic districts restrictions Approximately 3,500 properties (~17% of RS-zoned properties) In order to ensure new construction does not detract from the integrity of a district, a “Certificate of Appropriateness” (COA) permit is required COA required for any exterior work that is visible from public right- of-way to ensure compatibility with historic character Historic districts today permit the construction of new accessory structures, additions etc. without a COA if not visible from public right-of-way State Law: no discretionary review for ADUs

Revised Amendments Location Requirement for Newly Constructed ADUs – Historic Districts
Recommendation: Prohibit Newly Constructed ADUs in historic districts (Landmark, State and National Register Districts) unless it is not visible from the street and does not require a Certificate of Appropriateness Accessory Dwelling Units are not allowed on individually designated properties

Revised Amendments: Location Requirements for Newly Constructed ADUs
Existing Recommended Minimum Lot Size 15,000 sq. ft. 7,200 sq. ft. Zoning Districts Any RS zoning district Any RS or RM zoning district Historic Districts (Landmark, state, national) Prohibited Prohibited unless not visible from the street and not subject to a COA and Prohibited on individually designated historic property Hillside Overlay District No change

Map of where Newly Constructed ADUs are Proposed to be Permitted
# of properties RS zones ~9,901 RM zones ~1,178 Total ~11,079 *Note ADUs prohibited in Landmark Overlay Districts if visible from the street

Other Revised Amendments: Setbacks and Size
Existing Recommended Setbacks Side: 10% of the lot width, but no less than 5 ft., with a maximum requirement of 10 ft. Rear: 25 ft. Exception: side / rear setback for attached Newly Constructed ADUs constructed over an existing garage is 5 feet (Required per State Law) Side: No change Rear: 10 ft. (Same as RM-12) Exception: No change Maximum Size for Newly Constructed ADUs Detached: 800 square feet Attached: Lesser of 800 square feet or 50% of the existing living space Detached and Attached: Lesser of 800 square feet or 50% of the existing living space

Other Revised Amendments: Trees
Tree Protection Ordinance Protects trees on adopted list of ‘specimen’ and ‘native’ trees whose diameter at breast height (dbh) meets or exceeds specific threshold RS: Trees must also be in a ‘protected zone’ Established front and/or corner yard setback; Required side yard setback (5-10 ft.); or Required rear yard setback (25 ft.) If protected, Private Tree Removal Permit required Mature trees (≥19” dbh, regardless of species) are exempted for RS properties

Other Revised Amendments: Trees
Recommendation: Require a one-for-one replacement of mature trees in a protected zone if they are being removed in order to construct an ADU

Proposed Amendments: Other Standards
Existing Recommended Building Separation Six feet (eave-to-eave) 10 feet (eave-to-eave) if entry door faces a structure 6 feet from any structure (eave-to-eave) 2nd Story Newly Constructed ADUs Attached: Allowed if existing house is two stories in height Detached: Not allowed No change Height of detached Newly Constructed ADUs 17 feet to the highest point 12 feet to the top plate

Proposed Amendments: Other Standards
Existing Recommended Windows and doors for Converted ADUs within Historic Districts No regulation Windows and doors that are original to the structure are generally required to be retained, unless this requirement prevents creation of the ADU Minimum Unit Size for Newly Constructed ADUs None 150 sq. ft. (consistent with the State Law)

Zoning Code Amendment: Required Findings
Consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan Land Use Element Policy 2.1 (Housing Choices) Policy 7.1 (Compatibility) Policy 8.1 (Identify and Protect Historic Resources) Policy 8.5 (Scale and Character of New Construction in a Designated Landmark and Historic Districts) Policy 21.1 (Adequate and Affordable Housing) Policy 21.3 (Neighborhood Character) Policy 21.5 (Housing Character and Design) Policy 22.1 (Appropriate Scale and Massing) Policy 22.2 (Garages and Accessory Structures)

Zoning Code Amendment: Required Findings
Consistent with the goals and policies of the General Plan Housing Element Policy 1-1 (Neighborhood Character) Policy 2-1 (Housing Diversity) Implementation Program 13.2 Not detrimental to the public interest, health, safety, convenience, or general welfare of the City

Recommendation Acknowledge the proposed Zoning Code Amendments are exempt from environmental review (CEQA) Adopt the findings of consistency Approve the proposed Zoning Code Amendments Direct the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance

Development Impact Fees
Significant community interest in reducing City fees for construction on an ADU Residential Impact Fee (charged per bedroom) Studio ($18,472.73) to ≥ 5 bedrooms ($34,193.81) Traffic Reduction & Transportation Improvement Fee $2,889.70 If new unit is covenanted-restricted affordable Residential Impact Fee $957.30 Adjusted per Consumer Price Index No fee

Example Current Fees – Newly Constructed ADU
Example: 600 SF ADU, 1-bedroom, valuation of $68,310 FEE TOTAL FEE AMOUNT Residential Impact Fee $19,494.61 C&D Admin Review Fee $193.24 Traffic Reduction & Transportation Imp. Fee $2,889.70 Building Permit Fee $1,014.00 PUSD- Residential New Development $1,344.00 Construction Tax $1,311.55 Building Plan Check $1,379.00 SMIP: Residential $8.88 Fire Department Plan Check $290.00 Processing Fee $62.00 Design & Historic Plan Check $40.00 CA Building Standards Fee $4.00 Current Planning Plan Check $119.00 General Plan Maintenance $341.55 Public Works Plan Check $179.00 Technology Fee Sidewalk Damage Public Works $646.43 Records Mgmt 3% Surcharge $92.49 C&D Performance Security Deposit $2,049.30 TOTAL FEES $31,800.30

Example Current Fees – Converted ADU
Example: 600 SF ADU, 1-bedroom, valuation of $20,493 (30% of valuation) FEE TOTAL FEE AMOUNT Residential Impact Fee $19,494.61 C&D Admin Review Fee $193.24 Traffic Reduction & Transportation Imp. Fee $2,889.70 Building Permit Fee $384.00 PUSD- Residential New Development n/a Construction Tax $393.47 Building Plan Check $514.00 SMIP: Residential $2.66 Fire Department Plan Check $103.00 Processing Fee $62.00 Design & Historic Plan Check $21.00 CA Building Standards Fee $2.00 Current Planning Plan Check $49.00 General Plan Maintenance $102.47 Public Works Plan Check $74.00 Technology Fee Sidewalk Damage Public Works $646.43 Records Mgmt 3% Surcharge $36.21 C&D Performance Security Deposit $614.79 TOTAL FEES $25,685.05

Purpose of ADUs is to increase housing supply/options High fees are a deterrent for many homeowners At least one building permit application has been withdrawn and several have not yet been issued due to high fees Recommendation: Residential Impact Fee for an ADU $957.30 Traffic Reduction & Transportation Improvement Fee for an ADU No fee Incentive for Affordable ADU (Covenanted) Waive both Residential Impact Fee and Traffic Reduction & Transportation Improvement Fee

Recommendation Find the proposed Municipal Code Amendments are not subject to environmental review (CEQA) Approve the proposed Municipal Code Amendments (Section 4.17 and 4.19) Direct the City Attorney to prepare an Ordinance

Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017

State Law Amended State Law (AB 2299 and SB 1069)
Adopted to address the housing crisis (e.g. lack of supply in the rental market) Intended to encourage creation of ADUs and ensure local regulations do not unreasonably restrict ability of homeowners to create ADUs Cities must allow an ADU that is converted from an existing space in all single-family residential districts New Legislation Passed in September 2017 (AB 494 and SB 229) Intended to clarify the previously enacted bills Gives HCD authority to review local ADU ordinances

New Legislation: AB 494 and SB 229 September 2017
Intended to clarify the previously enacted bills related to ADUs AB 494 makes a number of changes to the ADU review process and standards Parking requirements HCD authority to review local ordinances SB 229 makes various clarifying and technical changes to ADU law Utility connections ADUs located on the same lot as primary dwelling

“Converted Accessory Dwelling Units”
State Law: AB 2299 and SB 1069 State Law regarding Accessory Dwelling Units (AB 2299, SB 1069) to address housing crisis Intended to ensure local regulations do not unreasonably restrict their creation Notable provisions of amended State Law: Accessory dwelling units created by converting existing space (“Converted ADUs”) must be allowed in all zoning districts that permit single-family use “Converted Accessory Dwelling Units” New ADU within existing space Existing

State Law: AB 2299 and SB 1069 Parking Standards Development Standards
One parking space per unit can be required in any form with exceptions Based on the exemption for lots located within ½ mile of public transit stop, no parking can be required for ADUs in most areas of the City If a garage or carport is demolished to accommodate an ADU, the required replacement parking can be in any form (e.g. on the driveway) Development Standards A setback cannot be required for an existing garage that is converted into an ADU Rear and side setbacks of no more than five feet can be required for an ADU constructed above an existing garage

City’s Existing Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations: Converted ADUs
Allowed on all zones that permit single- family residential uses Both attached and detached units are permitted New ADU within existing space Existing “Converted ADUs” Operational Standards One unit must be owner-occupied Cannot be sold separately from primary dwelling Units created after January 1, 2017 cannot be used for short-term rental Development Standards Must contain exterior door, and side and rear yard setbacks must be sufficient for fire safety Five-foot setback required if located above a garage

City’s Existing Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations
New ADU within existing space Existing “Converted ADUs” Existing “Newly Constructed ADUs” New ADU Explain the diagram – It should be noted that many provisions in the City’s regulations can’t be changed since these provisions are mandated by the State Law – these include parking requirements, certain setback requirements, and location where Interior ADUs are permitted. Staff will go over existing regulations for both types of the units.

“Newly Constructed ADUs”
City’s Existing Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations: Newly Constructed ADUs Allowed on all single-family zoned properties (RS) and that are at least 15,000 square feet in size Exception: Prohibited in Hillside and Landmark Overlay Districts Existing “Newly Constructed ADUs” New ADU Both attached and detached units are permitted

City’s Existing Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations: Newly Constructed ADUs
Development Standards Newly Constructed ADUs are subject to the development standards applicable to the primary dwelling (e.g. floor area, lot coverage, setbacks, etc.), except: Standards Maximum Unit Size Attached: lesser of 800 sq. ft. or 50% of the primary dwelling Detached: 800 sq. ft. Number of stories Limited to one-story unless ADU is attached to existing two-story primary dwelling Building Separation 6 ft. or 10 ft. Entry Door Cannot be visible from the public right-of-way Parking One parking space per unit unless exempt (e.g. located within ½ mile of public transit stop) Setback for ADUs located above existing garage 5 ft.

Examples – 5,000 sq. ft. Lot Maximum Floor Area: 2,000 sq. ft.
Street Existing House 2-Car Garage 50 ft. 100 ft. NEW ADU Maximum Floor Area: 2,000 sq. ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: N/A Existing house: ,200 sq. ft. Existing garage: sq. ft. Total: ,600 sq. ft. New Exterior ADU: sq. ft. New Total: 2,000 sq. ft. Existing House Alternative setback allowed for detached structures (under certain circumstances) Required setback for primary dwelling

Examples – 5,000 sq. ft. Lot Street Existing House 2-Car Garage 50 ft. 100 ft. NEW ADU Maximum Floor Area: 2,000 sq. ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: N/A Existing house: 1,200 sq. ft. Existing garage: 400 sq. ft. Total: 1,600 sq. ft. New Exterior ADU: 400 sq. ft. New Total: 1,780 sq. ft. Existing House (180 sq. ft. new sq. ft. conversion) Alternative setback allowed for detached structures (under certain circumstances) Required setback for primary dwelling

Examples – 7,200 sq. ft. Lot (2,520 to 2,880 sq. ft.)
Existing 2-Car Garage NEW ADU House Maximum Floor Area: 2,660 sq. ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% to 40% Existing house: ,600 sq. ft. Existing garage: sq. ft. Total: ,000 sq. ft. New Exterior ADU: sq. ft. New Total: 2,600 sq. ft. Existing House (2,520 to 2,880 sq. ft.) 120 ft. Alternative setback allowed for detached structures (under certain circumstances) Required setback for primary dwelling Street

Examples – 10,000 sq. ft. Lot (3,500 to 4,000 sq. ft.)
Existing House 2-Car Garage 64 ft. 155 ft. Street NEW ADU Maximum Floor Area: 3,500 sq. ft. Maximum Lot Coverage: 35% to 40% Existing house: ,200 sq. ft. Existing garage: sq. ft. Total: ,600 sq. ft. New Exterior ADU: sq. ft. New Total: 3,400 sq. ft. Existing House (3,500 to 4,000 sq. ft.) Alternative setback allowed for detached structures (under certain circumstances) Required setback for primary dwelling

Existing Accessory Dwelling Units
Between 2004 and 2016: Two building permit applications were approved and units constructed January 1, 2017 – December 7, 2017 15 building permit application for a new ADU were submitted None issued So in terms of existing ADUs in the City – Between 2004 and 2016, 2 new ADUs were built in the City. After January 1 of this year, which is the date that the State Law became effective, 12 building permit applications for a new ADU was submitted

Existing Accessory Dwelling Units
Existing RS-zoned properties with two residential units Approximately 740 properties (Los Angeles County Assessor data) It is likely that many of these properties are developed with legally non-conforming duplexes Unpermitted Accessory Dwelling Units No reliable database available to estimate the number of unpermitted accessory dwelling units 16 active Code Compliance cases involving illegal conversion of existing space into a dwelling unit (November 20)

All Single-Family Zoned Properties
(~20,331)

Single-Family Zoned Properties with 2 units
(~20,0331) (~740)

Map of where Converted ADUs are Currently Permitted
# of properties RS zones ~20,331 RM zones Total

Map of where Newly Constructed ADUs are Currently Permitted
# of properties RS zones ~1,275 RM zones Total Approximately 6% of RS zoned properties

15,000 square feet: Approximately 1,277 out of 20,331 recommended RS- zoned properties eligible (~6%) Includes Historic Districts Does not include Hillside Districts

10,000 square feet: Approximately 4,060 out of 20,331 recommended RS- zoned properties eligible (~20%) Includes Historic Districts Does not include Hillside Districts A 10,000 square-foot min was analyzed, but it was determined that it would not be consistent with the intent of the State Law as only 22 percent of RS zoned properties would be eligible under this category.

5,000 square feet: R-S and R-M zones Includes Historic Districts Does not include Hillside Districts

Areas Where Parking can be Required
(Newly Constructed ADUs) Properties where parking can be required for a new Exterior ADUs (~236)

RS zoned Properties Larger than 10,000 sq. ft.
(~6,858)

Map of Historic Districts
Individually Designated Properties

Map of Open Space

Public Transit and Car Share
Public Transit: Any public transit stop that is accessible from the public right-of-way Gold Line stations Bus stops Pasadena Transit (10, 20, 31, 32, 40, 51, 51s, 52, 6), Commuter Express (549), Foothill Transit Lines (690, 187), Metro Bus (177, 180, 181, 256, 260, 264, 266, 267, 268, 485, 487, 686, 687, 762, 762s, 780), Glendale Bee (3), Montebello Bus (20) Approximately 600 public transit stops in the City Car Share: Any commercial car share vehicle drop-off point (e.g. Zip Car, eRideShare) Approximately 25 drop-off points in the City

CEQA Exemption Under California Public Resources Code (CPRC) Section , California Environmental Quality Act (CEQA) does not apply to the adoption of an ordinance by a city or county implement the provisions of Section of the Government Code, which is State accessory dwelling unit law. Therefore, the proposed Zoning Code text amendments to the City’s accessory dwelling unit regulations are statutorily exempt from the CEQA in that the proposed amendments consists of provisions that further implements the state accessory dwelling unit law.

New Residential Impact Fees Based on number of bedrooms Ranges from $18, to $34,193.81 Traffic Reduction and Transportation Improvement Fee $2, per unit S.M.I.P. Tax $ of project valuation Construction Tax 1.92% of valuation PUSD Construction Fee (School District fee) $2.24 per sq. ft.

Accessory Structures: Existing Development Standards
Limitation on Location May not occupy a required front or corner side setback May not be located in a required side or rear setback; provided it is more than 100 feet from the front property line or in the rear 25 feet of the site. A lot abutting on the front 100 feet of a key lot shall maintain a minimum four-foot rear setback

Height and Setback Requirements Height limits Cannot exceed nine feet in height if the structure is located two feet from a property line If located more than two feet from a property line: 9-foot top plate limit Must comply with Encroachment Plane requirements 15-foot overall height limit

Length of structure walls Any portion of the structure that exceeds 22 feet in length and is less than five feet from the property line, shall be required to be set back a minimum of five feet from the property line

Definition of “Lot” (or parcel)
“Lot” is defined in the Zoning Code as “a legally established lot of land under one ownership with frontage upon a street” Types of lots include the following: Corner Lot, Double Frontage Lot, Flag or Corridor Lot, Interior lot, Key Lot, Reversed Corner Lot, Substandard Lot A legally non-conforming substandard lot (i.e. a lot that is smaller than the required minimum lot size for the applicable zoning district) is not an illegal lot

Tree Protection Ordinance (PMC 8.52)

Findings for Removal: There is a public benefit as defined in Section (R), or a public health, safety or welfare benefit, to the injury or removal that outweighs the protection of the specific tree; or The present condition of the tree is such that it is not reasonably likely to survive; or Tree is an objective feature of the tree that makes the tree not suitable for the protections of this chapter; or There would be a substantial hardship to a private property owner in the enjoyment and use of real property if the injury or removal is not permitted; or

Findings for Removal: To not permit injury to or removal of a tree would constitute a taking of the underlying real property; or The project, as defined in Section , includes a landscape design plan that emphasizes a tree canopy that is sustainable over the long term by adhering to the replacement matrix adopted by resolution of the city council and included in the associated administrative guidelines. Shall not apply to permits or approvals seeking removal of a landmark tree and landmark-eligible trees.

Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback

Log in

Auth with social network:

Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017.

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "Zoning Code Text Amendments: Accessory Dwelling Unit Regulations and Municipal Code Amendments: Development Impact Fees City Council December 11, 2017."— Presentation transcript:

Similar presentations

About project

Feedback