Download presentation
Presentation is loading. Please wait.
Published byJocelin Sutton Modified over 6 years ago
1
WIC/Immunization “Record Round-up” Project: Filling the Gaps
National Immunization Conference March 18, 2003 I am very excited to be here today to share our experiences with the WIC/Immunization “Record Round-Up” Project: Filling the Gaps”. We are fully aware that this project was not the sole reason for the increase in 4:3:1:3:3 completion rates Sheryl Pickering Local Program Consultant Washington WIC Program Pamela Johnson Program Linkages Coordinator Immunization Program
2
Overview Background Project Specifics Results
Staff and Client Comments Lessons Learned Next Steps
3
Project Background Statewide WIC/IZ Planning Workshop established – October 2000 1999 NIS data (4:3:1:3:3, 19 – 35 mo.) WIC participants 63.1 (+ 6.6) Non-WIC participants 70.7 (+ 5.7) Five-Year Linkage Strategic Plan developed – March 2002 The Washington State DOH WIC and Immunization Programs have had a long history of collaboration. In October 2000 we established a statewide workgroup to develop a five-year plan for collaboration activities that expanded beyond what we had been doing the past few years NIS data for WIC and non-WIC participants was considered in the work that resulted in the development of a 5-year strategic plan.
4
Project Background Plan includes specific goals and objectives to populate the registry Group recommended immunization record collection project USDA requirements to screen immunizations – March 2003
5
Main Project Goals Populate the registry
Increase the percentage of children – 35 months complete for 4:3:1:3:3
6
Secondary Project Goals
Registry promotion Increased awareness about immunizations Strengthen partnerships
8
Project Specifics Time Frame: 9/2002 – 12/2002
WIC agencies given $2.00 for each infant/child in caseload + $500 for office supplies Data entry funded at $2.00 for 70% of caseload
9
Project Specifics Incentives given to parents
Fruit/Vegetable Seedie CharactersTM Washington State Immunization Record Card and Plastic Sleeve
10
Selection of Project Sites
1/31/2002 CHILD Profile registry report information for: 19 – 35 months County specific 4:3:1:3:3
11
2002 WIC Roundup Project Sites
Whatcom San Juan Okanogan Pend Oreille Skagit Ferry Stevens Island Clallam Snohomish Chelan Jefferson Douglas Kitsap Lincoln Spokane King Grays Harbor Mason Kittitas Grant Pierce Adams Whitman Thurston Pacific Lewis Franklin Garfield Yakima Columbia Wahkiakum Cowlitz Benton Asotin Walla Walla Skamania Klickitat Clark
12
Main Project Goals Populate the registry
Increase the percentage of children – 35 months complete for 4:3:1:3:3
13
Types of Records Collected
Agency Total New Enhanced Complete Unreadable Other Benton Franklin HD 1443 24 1191 228 Cowlitz Family Health 592 27 259 97 1 209 Jefferson Co. HD 140 52 57 31 Kitsap Comm. Resources 743 493 108 2 Kittitas Co. HD 95 19 59 17 Lewis Co. HD 410 11 358 41 Peninsula CHS 669 112 400 153 3 San Juan Co. HD 49 6 29 14 Skagit Comm. Action 1296 44 1086 166 Spokane Co. HD 4698 1062 2874 753 Thurston Co. HD 553 42 408 101 Whatcom Co. HD 363 5 317 11,051 1544 7531 1750 8 14% 68% 16% < 1%
14
Types of Records Collected
15
Caseload and Records Collected Comparison
Agency Caseload # of records collected % Benton Franklin HD 4130 1443 34% Cowlitz Family Health 1913 592 31% Jefferson Co. HD 395 140 35% Kitsap Comm. Resources 2844 743 26% Kittitas Co. HD 498 95 19% Lewis Co. HD 1921 410 21% Peninsula CHS 1509 669 44% San Juan Co. HD 49 Skagit Comm. Action 2458 1296 52% Spokane Co. HD 8090 4698 58% Thurston Co. HD 2037 553 27% Whatcom Co. HD 1875 363 Total 27,810 11,051 39%
16
Main Project Goals Populate the registry
Increase the percentage of children – 35 months complete for 4:3:1:3:3
17
Time Frames Used in Selection and Assessment
January 2002 Used to determine counties selected August 2002 Pre-project cross-sectional comparison data December 2002 Post-project cross-sectional comparison data
18
Comparison by County Complete 4:3:1:3:3
19
Comparison by County 4:3:1:3:3 to 3:3:1:3:3
20
What Did Staff Say About the Project?
Best thing about the project: Getting clients’ records updated in registry Got people thinking about immunizations Helping to make a difference One agency director is so enthused, wants WIC to continue to collect records
21
WIC Staff Loved the project Way to provide quality services
Felt good seeing clients excited about incentives One more thing to do in a busy schedule, but worthwhile Since Immunizations was decreasing hours, WIC staff thought it was negative since they wanted to be able to refer clients for shots right away.
22
Immunization and Data Entry Staff
Data entry was challenging at times Interpreting foreign records Difficult to read Poor copy quality Having complete immunization history helps all of us
23
WIC Clients They loved it
Grateful for the help to get children in the registry Felt WIC and Immunization staff cared about their children's well-being Excited about the incentives
24
Lessons Learned Communication Project Timeline Funding and Contracting
Implementation
25
Communication Notify appropriate administrators at state and local levels prior to project Develop system for consistent notification Set up primary contacts for: WIC Immunization Fiscal
26
More Lessons on Communication
Set up multiple distribution lists for and regular mail Communicate with CHILD Profile Communicate with healthcare providers
27
Project Timeline Clear beginning and ending dates
Remember WIC clinics now see clients every 3 months Consider other events and requirements happening at the clinics
28
More Lessons on Timeline
Include client notification period Include CHILD Profile training Remember agency’s procurement requirements
29
Funding and Contracting
Develop spreadsheet with funding specifics Determine caseload numbers Coordinate “cross program” funding Coordinate different types of contracts Joint letter to help emphasize the WIC Immunization partnership
30
Implementation Parent letter needs to be short and easy to read
Use “shot record” instead of “immunization record” Translations -- “mother’s maiden name” not understood
31
More Lessons on Implementation
Incentives Assure they are age appropriate Assure they arrive at the clinic before project begins
32
More Lessons on Implementation
Develop “Frequently Asked Questions” sheet to help WIC staff answer clients’ questions Assure there is coordination between WIC and data entry staff Get excited about the project – friendly competition among staff
33
What’s Next in Washington?
Still have more work to do Conduct similar project in 2003 Will apply lessons learned Continue to work on strengthen our partnership Share our work locally and nationally
34
Program Contacts Pamela Johnson Sheryl Pickering
Program Linkages Coordinator Washington State Department of Health PO Box 47843 Olympia, WA (360) Sheryl Pickering Local Program Consultant Washington WIC Program PO Box 47886 Olympia, WA (360)
Similar presentations
© 2024 SlidePlayer.com. Inc.
All rights reserved.