Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

ELI 2012 2.6.12 9/11/2018 Prototypes, Connections, And Contracts: Examining Increasingly Complex Learning Environments Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal Research.

Published byJared Sharp Modified over 6 years ago

Similar presentations

Presentation on theme: "ELI 2012 2.6.12 9/11/2018 Prototypes, Connections, And Contracts: Examining Increasingly Complex Learning Environments Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal Research."— Presentation transcript:

1 ELI 9/11/2018 Prototypes, Connections, And Contracts: Examining Increasingly Complex Learning Environments Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness Center for Distributed Learning University of Central Florida

2 Copyright C. Dziuban, P. Moskal (2012)
Copyright C. Dziuban, P. Moskal (2012). This work is the intellectual property of the authors. Permission is granted for this material to be shared for non-commercial, educational purposes, provided that this copyright statement appears on the reproduced materials and notice is given that the copying is by permission of the author. To disseminate otherwise or to republish requires written permission from the authors."

3 The Anna Karenina Principle
ELI Tolstoy “All happy families are alike…” The Anna Karenina Principle

4 Psychological Contracts
ELI Psychological Contracts The Important Stuff May Be What You Can’t See

5 Psychological Contracts
ELI Psychological Contracts Psychological Contract Employer expectations Employee expectations

6 Psychological Contracts and Education
ELI Psychological Contracts and Education Psychological Contract Instructor expectations Student expectations

7 Excuse Us (reasons for divorce)
ELI Excuse Us (reasons for divorce) Over focus on children Debt Financial Disagreements Alcohol/Drug Abuse Gambling Partner’s Infidelity Their Infidelity Empty Nest Runaway Hobbies Life Changing Event Boredom Commuting Their Career Lack of Sex Abuse My Career Source: insidedivorce.com McCandless, 2009

8 ELI Ambivalence

9 ELI Ambivalence “Ambivalence is a state of simultaneous high positive and high negative evaluation of an attitude object.” Craig & Martinez (2005)

10 Academic Ambivalence: Utopia Dystopia
ELI Academic Ambivalence: Utopia Dystopia

11 Sources of Ambivalence- Weigert
ELI 9/11/2018 Sources of Ambivalence- Weigert Change Complexity ? Incompleteness Ambiguity Pluralism Uncertainty Weigert (1991)

12 ELI Available on Amazon at:

13 ELI Anna Says….

14 I can’t get no…. Student Satisfaction
ELI I can’t get no…. Student Satisfaction Ambivalence Learning Latitude Enriched Learning Environment Engagement Rules of Engagement Respect and Concern Instructor Committed to Learning

15 “This guy is so boring, my pillow needs a pillow!”
ELI Students Say… “This guy is so boring, my pillow needs a pillow!” -Ratemyprofessor.com

16 The Student Evaluation Protocol
ELI The Student Evaluation Protocol Feedback Description of objectives Interest in learning Communication Use of class time Expression of expectations Continuity Availability to assist Pace of course Respect and concern Assessment of your progress Stimulation of interest Texts and supplemental material Facilitation of learning Overall assessment

17 The Student Evaluation Protocol
ELI The Student Evaluation Protocol Feedback Description of objectives Interest in learning Communication Use of class time Expression of expectations Continuity Availability to assist Pace of course Respect and concern Assessment of your progress Stimulation of interest Texts and supplemental material Facilitation of learning Overall assessment

18 ELI A decision rule for the probability of faculty member receiving an overall rating of Excellent If... Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Facilitation of learning Communication of ideas Respect and concern for students Then... The probability of an overall rating of Excellent = & The probability of an overall rating of Fair or Poor =.00

19 ELI A comparison of excellent ratings by college unadjusted and adjusted for instructors satisfying Rule 1 Overall If Rule 1 College % Excellent % Excellent Education 60 98 Nursing 54 98 Health & Public Affairs 53 98 Arts & Humanities 51 97 Optics & Photonics 49 94 Hospitality Management 48 97 Medicine 46 98 Sciences 45 97 Business Administration 44 97 Engineering & Comp Sci 39 97

20 Modality % Excellent % Excellent
ELI A comparison of excellent ratings by course modality--unadjusted and adjusted for instructors satisfying Rule 1 Course Overall If Rule 1 Modality % Excellent % Excellent Blended 52 97 Fully Online 48 97 F2F Blended LC 43 97 Lecture Capture 42 97

21 ELI A decision rule for the probability of faculty member receiving an overall rating of Poor If... Excellent Very Good Good Fair Poor Facilitation of learning Communication of ideas Respect and concern for students Then... The probability of an overall rating of Poor = & The probability of an overall rating of Very Good or Excellent =.00

22 ELI A comparison of poor ratings by college unadjusted and adjusted for instructors satisfying Rule 2 Overall If Rule 2 College % Poor % Poor Engineering & Comp Sci Business Administration Sciences Medicine Hospitality Management Arts & Humanities Health & Public Affairs Education Nursing Optics & Photonics

23 Course Overall If Rule 2 Modality % Poor % Poor Lecture Capture 4.0 93
ELI A comparison of poor ratings by course modality--unadjusted and adjusted for instructors satisfying Rule 2 Course Overall If Rule 2 Modality % Poor % Poor Lecture Capture Blended LC Fully Online F2F Blended

24 Did you find value in your online course?
ELI Did you find value in your online course? Well…yes and no

25 Levels of ambivalence in Likert scale choices
ELI 9/11/2018 Levels of ambivalence in Likert scale choices Some Ambivalence High Medium Low Ambivalence Levels Strongly Negative Negative Neutral Positive Strongly Positive

26 Overall Rating of the Instructor
ELI Overall Rating of the Instructor Ambivalent Positive Ambivalent Negative Ambivalent Negative Non-ambivalent Positive Non-ambivalent

27 Instructor Engagement
ELI Satisfied All the Way Instructor Engagement Course Landscape Benchmark Progress Positive Non Ambivalent =5 r = .61 N = 31544

28 Satisfied But Maybe Some Stuff I Didn’t Like
ELI Satisfied But Maybe Some Stuff I Didn’t Like Expectation Rules Instructor Engagement Course Rhythm Benchmark Progress Positive Ambivalent = 4 r = .41 N = 16428

29 Instructor Responsiveness
ELI I Just Don’t Know Expectation Rules Course Rhythm Instructor Responsiveness Benchmark Progress Instructor Engagement Ambivalent = 3 r = .38 N = 10765

30 Not Satisfied But Maybe Some Good Stuff
ELI Not Satisfied But Maybe Some Good Stuff Instructor Responsiveness Course Rhythm My Progression Benchmark Progress Negative Ambivalent = 2 r = .36 N = 3790

31 Instructor Engagement
ELI No Way Negative Non Ambivalent = 1 r = .53 N = 1975 Instructor Engagement Course Landscape Benchmark Progress

32 Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition
ELI Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition Positive Non-Ambivalent Positive Ambivalent Negative Ambivalent Negative Non-Ambivalent Ambivalent Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression

33 Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition
ELI Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition Positive Non-Ambivalent Positive Ambivalent Negative Ambivalent Negative Non-Ambivalent Ambivalent Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression

34 Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition
ELI Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition Positive Non-Ambivalent Positive Ambivalent Negative Ambivalent Negative Non-Ambivalent Ambivalent Expectation Rules Course Rhythm Course Rhythm Course Rhythm

35 Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition
ELI Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition Positive Non-Ambivalent Positive Ambivalent Negative Ambivalent Negative Non-Ambivalent Ambivalent Engagement Progression Course Rhythm Instructor Responsiveness

36 Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition
ELI Factor Summary for Each Ambivalent Condition Positive Non-Ambivalent r=.61 Positive Ambivalent r=.41 Negative Ambivalent r=.36 Negative Non-Ambivalent r=.53 Ambivalent r=.38 Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Engagement Progression Expectation Rules Course Rhythm Course Rhythm Course Rhythm Instructor Responsiveness

37 Ambivalent Students Make Morphological Connections
ELI Ambivalent Students Make Morphological Connections

38 Morphological Design Shape Material Cap Ink Source Faceted Metal
ELI Morphological Design Shape Material Cap Ink Source Faceted Metal Attached cap No cartridge Square Glass No cap Permanent Beaded Wood Retracts Paper cartridge Sculpted Paper Cleaning cap Cartridge made of ink

39 Morphologically: It was Mrs. Peacock
Lounge Dining Room Kitchen Ballroom Conservatory Billiard Room Library Study Hall Colonel Mustard Ms. Scarlet Mrs. White Mr. Green Mrs. Peacock Professor Plum Candlestick Knife Lead Pipe Revolver Rope Wrench

40 Prototype Student Responses
ELI Prototype Student Responses Course Rhythm Expectation Rules Benchmark Progress Instructor Engagement Instructor Responsiveness 5 4 3 2 1

41 Prototype Student Responses
ELI Prototype Student Responses Course Rhythm Expectation Rules Benchmark Progress Instructor Engagement Instructor Responsiveness 5 4 3 2 1

42 Prototype Student Responses
ELI Prototype Student Responses Course Rhythm Expectation Rules Benchmark Progress Instructor Engagement Instructor Responsiveness 5 4 3 2 1

43 Prototype Student Responses
ELI Prototype Student Responses Course Rhythm Expectation Rules Benchmark Progress Instructor Engagement Instructor Responsiveness 5 4 3 2 1

44 Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness
ELI Research Initiative for Teaching Effectiveness For more information contact: Dr. Chuck Dziuban (407) Dr. Patsy Moskal (407)

Download ppt "ELI 2012 2.6.12 9/11/2018 Prototypes, Connections, And Contracts: Examining Increasingly Complex Learning Environments Chuck Dziuban Patsy Moskal Research."

Similar presentations

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.

University-Wide Course Evaluation Committee Peter Biehl, Chair, Department of Anthropology Krissy Costanzo, Committee Staff Support; Academic Affairs March.
No Money? Try Vision. Academic Issues and the Uses of Technology in Financially Tight Times Susanne Woods – SAC, 2002 Copyright Susanne Woods, 2002. This.

No Money? Try Vision. Academic Issues and the Uses of Technology in Financially Tight Times Susanne Woods – SAC, 2002 Copyright Susanne Woods, This.
What Students Say About Emerging Practices and Learning Technology Anthony Potoczniak - Rice University Sarah E. Smith - North Carolina State University.

What Students Say About Emerging Practices and Learning Technology Anthony Potoczniak - Rice University Sarah E. Smith - North Carolina State University.
Campus Video Services Alliance: A Strategic Partnership and Its Effects Copyright Jim Duncan and Molly Langstaff 2004. This work is the intellectual property.

Campus Video Services Alliance: A Strategic Partnership and Its Effects Copyright Jim Duncan and Molly Langstaff This work is the intellectual property.
What Does the Net Generation Expect From Us? SAC August 8, 2005 SAC August 8, 2005 Copyright © 2005, Joel L. Hartman. This work is the intellectual property.

What Does the Net Generation Expect From Us? SAC August 8, 2005 SAC August 8, 2005 Copyright © 2005, Joel L. Hartman. This work is the intellectual property.
Creating A More Educated Georgia Plagiarism Detection: Is Technology the Answer? USG Surveys 2003-2007 Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies.

Creating A More Educated Georgia Plagiarism Detection: Is Technology the Answer? USG Surveys Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies.
Do the Data Support our Assumptions? Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.

Do the Data Support our Assumptions? Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Technology as a Tool for Effective Teaching and Learning Chuck Dziuban University of Central Florida.

Technology as a Tool for Effective Teaching and Learning Chuck Dziuban University of Central Florida.
Implications of Web-based Learning for Student Evaluation of University Teaching Chuck DziubanSteve Sorg Research Initiative for Teaching Center for Distributed.

Implications of Web-based Learning for Student Evaluation of University Teaching Chuck DziubanSteve Sorg Research Initiative for Teaching Center for Distributed.
A Look at Online Teaching and Learning at UCF Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.

A Look at Online Teaching and Learning at UCF Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
Technology-Enhanced Learning: Opportunities and Challenges Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.

Technology-Enhanced Learning: Opportunities and Challenges Charles D. Dziuban Patsy D. Moskal University of Central Florida.
State University of New York A model for online learning in the SUNY Learning Network NLII Annual Meeting – January - 2003 Online Learning Environments:

State University of New York A model for online learning in the SUNY Learning Network NLII Annual Meeting – January Online Learning Environments:
National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.

National Research Agenda to Support Transformation National Learning Infrastructure Initiative Focus Session June, 2003 Copyright Jillian Kinzie, 2003.
Five Berkeley Campuses Three in NJ; Two in NY Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Degree Online Online Courses Hybrid Courses Web Enhanced Courses.

Five Berkeley Campuses Three in NJ; Two in NY Bachelor of Science in Business Administration Degree Online Online Courses Hybrid Courses Web Enhanced Courses.
Student Technological Mastery: It's Not Just the Hardware Wm. H. Huffman, Ph.D. Ann H. Huffman, Ph.D.

Student Technological Mastery: It's Not Just the Hardware Wm. H. Huffman, Ph.D. Ann H. Huffman, Ph.D.
Arizona State University, 2004 Ingredients For Success: Online Applications, Supplemental Materials, Document Imaging and Project Management Roger Lurie.

Arizona State University, 2004 Ingredients For Success: Online Applications, Supplemental Materials, Document Imaging and Project Management Roger Lurie.
Screenshots of the CourseTrak System CourseTrak was designed and developed with Lotus Notes R 5 and 6, and is a Lotus Notes database system designed to.

Screenshots of the CourseTrak System CourseTrak was designed and developed with Lotus Notes R 5 and 6, and is a Lotus Notes database system designed to.
The Team Approach: A Paradigm Shift for Designing Successful Online Courses NERCOMP 2005 College for Lifelong Learning, Manchester, NH.

The Team Approach: A Paradigm Shift for Designing Successful Online Courses NERCOMP 2005 College for Lifelong Learning, Manchester, NH.
Washington and Lee University Lexington, Virginia EDUCAUSE 2002 Juggling Opportunities in Collaborative Environments October 1 ‑ 4, Atlanta, Georgia.

Washington and Lee University Lexington, Virginia EDUCAUSE 2002 "Juggling Opportunities in Collaborative Environments" October 1 ‑ 4, Atlanta, Georgia.
Creating A More Educated Georgia Plagiarism Detection: Is Technology the Answer? USG Surveys 2003-2007 Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies.

Creating A More Educated Georgia Plagiarism Detection: Is Technology the Answer? USG Surveys Liz Johnson Project Manager Advanced Learning Technologies.

Similar presentations

Ads by Google