Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Presentation is loading. Please wait.

Open is not enough! Sustainability and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

Similar presentations


Presentation on theme: "Open is not enough! Sustainability and Innovation in Scholarly Communication"— Presentation transcript:

1

2 Open is not enough! Sustainability and Innovation in Scholarly Communication

3 Education, research and knowledge are critical for sustainable development
But our system for sharing and disseminating knowledge must also be sustainable

4 All the valuable products of research should be shared!

5 Open Access

6 International Journals 

7 Bid deals lock-ins Slide from Stéphanie Gagnon, Université de Montréal Libraries (and thanks to Richard Dumont)

8 The participation problem
Juan Pablo Alperin:

9

10 Costs of Article Processing Charges
Jisc 2016

11 YES!

12 Moving from articles to research data

13 Many researchers would rather share their toothbrush than there data…

14 Lack of infrastructure and services
Domain Data Centres These services still only support a small portion of the research datasets produced by researchers around the world!

15 Good research data management is complex and resource intensive!

16 Open Science support is like a three legged stool
Culture, Incentives and Norms Laws, Policies and Protocols Infrastructure and Services

17 The vast majority of open access policies are green!
OA Policy Requirements – Pasteur4OA Project (European Commission)

18 Open Science support is like a three legged stool
Culture, Incentives and Norms Laws, Policies and Protocols Infrastructure and Services

19 Sustainability and good practice for open science services means working across all stakeholder organizations Libraries/research organization (institutional repositories and local support) Universities (incentives and policies) National networks (moving content) Compute facilities (storage, analysis) Governments and and funders (policies and funding) Researchers (to contribute and use content)

20 Regardless of the type of content, repositories are an important part of the solution

21 International update

22 International update

23 Research is global!

24 76.5% of Nepalese authors publish with a foreign co-author!
UNESCO World Science Report, 2016

25 Australasia, Canada, China, Europe, Japan, Latin America, South Africa, United States

26 Common global vision for repositories
Adoption and improvement of networked services and technologies Standard vocabularies and metadata and APIs Implementation of next generation repositories

27 Open Science support is like a three legged stool
Culture, Incentives and Norms Laws, Policies and Protocols Infrastructure and Services

28 Timothy Gowers “perverse incentives”

29 It’s a vicious cycle Undertake research projects that are hot topics and of global interest Publish in English in a prestige journal Great research evaluation because you published in an high journal with high impact factor Enjoy fame, fortune, and fawning by colleagues and others Receive more funding for more research

30

31 The current situation 
Ridiculously high costs Lack of innovation (the journal article has essentially not changed in 300 years – despite the web) Publication biases Significant inequalities in access and participation flawed quality and impact measures Big deal lock in with publishers Publisher consolidation across the lifecycle

32 We need solutions that will scale!

33 Leverage the network of over 3000 repositories around the world

34 But, in their current form, repositories only perpetuate the existing system

35

36

37

38 By Petr Knoth, CORE

39 Peer review layer Standard usage statistics Preservation Social networking Improved discovery

40 To support these services, we need to improve the functionality of repositories -To be of, not just on the web -Global interoperability (exposing content in a standardized way) -Pro-active repositories -A networked approach is crucial to avoid silos and support global, disciplinary and regional services

41 And ideally, the infrastructure should be distributed across the globe!
It can better support the needs and of diverse regions, disciplines and languages Redundancy is a safeguard against failure Not at risk of commercial buy-out Places the institution/library at the centre But, a distributed approach is more challenging in terms of a common vision, coordination and branding

42 #9: Local infrastructure that is sustainable and inclusive (Open, distributed systems, like the Internet, are more flexible, sustainable and less likely to failure or being bought out by commercial industry)

43

44 MIT Future of Libraries Report

45 Critical to the success of open science is working together: Across the world & across the stakeholder communities


Download ppt "Open is not enough! Sustainability and Innovation in Scholarly Communication"

Similar presentations


Ads by Google