1. ~ WELCOME ~ 2017 October Convening Hosted by
California State University East Bay &
San Jose State University
Play Video
WiFi
Marriot_Conference
AVMS456
Tweet #CPED2017

2. State of CPED Welcome Address
Jill A. Perry, Executive Director
October 2017 Convening – Oakland, CA

3. Creating New Futures: Thinking Differently to Build a Better World
Relate to each other as practitioners
Emphasize our collective work to improve the EdD
Collaborate in meaningful and intentional ways to improve educational practice
Celebrate our creative differences across members
Serve as role models to our students
Creating New Futures: Thinking Differently to Build a Better World  

4. Messages from June 2017
Is what GOT you here today enough to GET you where we want to go tomorrow?
How can CPED Members:
Keep our research practice innovative?
Ensure & improve the centrality of addressing pressing problems of practice?
Community of Innovators
Investigate our “active site”
Make our evidence of change public
Invite others to critique our learning
Pass it on for continuous improvement

5. SOEs Graduates Shared IMPACT
Programs
Faculty
SOEs
Problems of Practice
Graduates
Shared IMPACT
We are Practitioners w/ shared Commitment for EdD Redesign
We are
Networked Improvement Community.

6. HARVARD ED PUBLICATION GROUP (HEPG) BOOK PROPOSAL RESPONSE
Whether this book makes a significant contribution to the “field” depends heavily on whether schools of education are interested in its emphasis upon doctoral education in improving educational practice. So far that is very weak subject. While many graduate schools of education profess to prepare practitioners at the doctoral level in ways that will improve educational practice, so far few are able to do so effectively, regularly and widely. Most are still caught in explaining the problem, not in fixing it. Hence, programs that claim to make doctoral graduates able to remedy the educational flaws found in the US and thus improve educational practice lack broad public support for their enterprise. If such programs were ever able to provide compelling evidence for their claims, undoubtedly they would be in great demand since without question such skills would be extremely valuable. If the authors had evidence that doctoral preparation in education was truly changing as a result of their efforts, then this book would be very useful.

7. Spencer 2009: Graduate Outcome FIPSE 2010-2014: SOE change
WT Grant Study : Graduate Research Evidence Use
CPED Report 2017: History, demographics, Framework

8. Norms of Engagement
1) CPED members engage with each other to make decisions about the EdD.
2) CPED members are active, respectful, and courteous listeners.
3) To ensure the highest quality education doctorate programs, CPED members serve each other as critical friends.
4) CPED members respect and value the time they have together and apart.
5) CPED members share ideas and resources.
6) When information is shared or data are gathered within an institution, or across the consortium, it is credited and kept confidential.
7) CPED members collaborate with various organizations.
8) CPED members promote CPED.
9) CPED members strive for excellence through high impact practices and continuous improvement.
10) CPED members promote accessibility and inclusion.

9. for your commitment, hard work, willingness.
THANK YOU
for your commitment, hard work, willingness.

10. CPED Board of Directors
David Imig, University of Maryland, Chair
David Rock, Dean, University of Mississippi
Virginia Roach, Dean, Fordham University
Jay Fiene, Dean, CSU San Bernardino
Jon Pedersen, Dean, University of South Carolina
Gaetane Jean-Marie, Northern Iowa University
Valerie Kinloch, Dean, University of Pittsburgh, ex officio
Jennifer K. Rice, Dean, University of Maryland, ex officio
Jill Perry, Executive Director, ex officio
Retiring Member:
Lucindia Chance, Georgia Southern University
CPED Board of Directors

13. iLead
AIM
STRATEGY
To prepare school and teacher leaders capable of engaging in continuous improvement toward dual goals of equity and excellence
In their locality
Create Exemplary Instructional Programs
Local Workforce Development
Build Repositories for Instructional Resources in Improvement Science
Deepen Higher Education Institutions in Local Service by enhancing the demand side
Create a Scholarship Production Infrastructure for Improvement Science

14. iLEAD’s Nested Communities
Interest
Engagement
Practice
Collaborate in creating design, research, and strategy
Access to iLEAD products
Attend iLEAD meeting at the Carnegie Summit
Participate in Higher Education Network
Contribute to the knowledge repository
iLead pilot program in place by June 2019
Pilot iLEAD program in place by June 2018.
iLEAD cohort in place by Augu2018
Consensus 3-year development plan for connecting continuous improvement to degree programs 2019
Participate in iLEAD design convenings
Participate in documenting progress of iLEAD teams